>[snip] -- we get the sense that there may be
> well something to at least two theories about disclosure, and that even
> disclosure's advocates get it:
>
> 1) that the burden of disclosure must be balanced against its costs
>
> 2) that disclosure, either demanded or provided, is often a tool and
> accelerant for retribution
What I "get" is that without disclosure/transparency, accountability
is not possible. Who can really be in favor of un-accountability in
government?
What is being styled as "retribution" is at best a minor percentage of
the overall and critical process of accountability in government.
--
Paul R Lehto, J.D.
P.O. Box 1
Ishpeming, MI 49849
lehto.paul@gmail.com
906-204-4026 (cell)