Not if they are collaborating with the harassers.
There are degrees and kinds of harassment. It can extend to
assassination, which may be unlikely but only has to happen once for a
given speaker/publisher.
Our rights were forged in an environment of occupation by a brutal
enemy, and defense of them should always assume real enemies that are
capable of anything. Abuses by government officials are not just in the
movies. I have had my life threatened by a government agent after I
criticized his agency. Some of you seem to be oblivious to how brutal
it can get in the real world.
Or it can be simply a matter that the speaker/publisher wants his words
to be evaluated on their own merit without intrusion by his reputation,
be it good or bad, with various recipients. If the author is a known
partisan, his words may be largely ignored by both his opponents and
supporters, rather than made the subject of deep deliberation.
On 04/05/2011 03:37 PM, Rick Hasen wrote:
In the campaign
finance context, it makes sense to have a court or regulatory body made
determinations about harassment.
-- Jon
----------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society http://constitution.org
2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322 twitter.com/lex_rex
Austin, TX 78757 512/299-5001 jon.roland@constitution.org
----------------------------------------------------------