Subject: Re: [EL] nailbiter in Wisconsin Supreme Court race
From: Aaron Ament
Date: 4/5/2011, 9:13 PM
To: "Bonin, Adam C." <ABonin@cozen.com>
CC: Election Law <election-law@mailman.lls.edu>

Adam - I have no answer to your second question although I am interested to hear if someone does.  However, Prosser and Gableman have been at the center of the debate around recusal issues in Wisconsin for some time now:

http://wislawjournal.com/blog/2011/04/01/recusal-issue-may-return-after-tuesdays-election/


On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Bonin, Adam C. <ABonin@cozen.com> wrote:
Doomsday question: suppose these election results are contested in the courts. Is the entire Wisconsin Supreme Court conflicted out of handling this? Has there ever been an election dispute rising to the highest court of a state involving election to that court?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice: To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this e-mail, including attachments, is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice: This communication, including attachments, may contain information that is confidential and protected by the attorney/client or other privileges. It constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If the reader or recipient of this communication is not the intended recipient, an employee or agent of the intended recipient who is responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, or you believe that you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this e-mail, including attachments without reading or saving them in any manner. The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney/client or other privilege.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu on behalf of Rick Hasen
Sent: Tue 4/5/2011 11:11 PM
To: Election Law
Subject: [EL] nailbiter in Wisconsin Supreme Court race

http://elections.todaystmj4.com/G8801.htm



       RESULTS as of Tuesday, Apr 05, 2011 at 10:10 pm CDT
Election Home <http://elections.todaystmj4.com/L01F001.htm>

       Supreme Court    REPORTING       58%
        Joanne Kloppenburg      447,930

       50%
        David Prosser (inc)     443,961

       50%

--
Rick Hasen
Visiting Professor
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen@law.uci.edu

William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law
Loyola Law School
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org



_______________________________________________
election-law mailing list
election-law@mailman.lls.edu
http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law