Subject: Re: [EL] Wisc
From: "Lowenstein, Daniel" <lowenstein@law.ucla.edu>
Date: 4/7/2011, 6:11 PM
To: "Smith, Brad" <BSmith@law.capital.edu>, Larry Levine <larrylevine@earthlink.net>, election-law <election-law@mailman.lls.edu>

      I suspect Larry was referring to the initial omission of these votes and the subsequent discovery of them, not the margin of Prosser's gain.  But Larry, if the County Clerk wants to look for a job someplace where such practices are the custom, I'd recommend she apply to King County, Washington.

             Best,

             Daniel H. Lowenstein
             Director, Center for the Liberal Arts and Free Institutions (CLAFI)
             UCLA Law School
             405 Hilgard
             Los Angeles, California 90095-1476
             310-825-5148


________________________________
From: election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu [election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu] On Behalf Of Smith, Brad [BSmith@law.capital.edu]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 5:36 PM
To: Larry Levine; election-law
Subject: Re: [EL] Wisc

I don't think that your description is correct, Larry.  As I understand it (and I could be wrong, I'm just reading early press reports, and I've not been on line today until now, having spent the day traveling from New Orleans) she found some 14,000 plus votes, which resulted in a net addition for Prosser of some 7500 votes - which would not be unlikely for any 15K of votes in heavly Republican Waukesha County.  More precisely, the numbers were 10,859 for Prosser and 3456 for  Kloppenberg (another report I've seen says it was 11,008 for Prosser, see www.jsonline.com/news/waukesha/119424759.html<http://www.jsonline.com/news/waukesha/119424759.html>.)

I can understand suspicion - certainly you'd find it in some Republicans if the same type of correction occured in Dane County for a Democratic gain - but that's a huge difference from just "finding" 7500+ votes all going to the same candidate.

Ramona Kitzinger, Vice-Chair of the Waukesha County Democratic Party and a member of the canvassing board, has apparently vouched for the new results, although I've not seen that sourced  - it appeared at National Review online, which did not list their source.

As I have done often in the past, I urge both sides to be very cautious with claims of "fraud." I said it back in 2000 and I've said it in almost every contested election since. But you are correct that mistakes and screw ups create suspicion.


Bradley A. Smith
Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault Designated Professor of Law
Capital University Law School
303 E. Broad St.
Columbus, OH 43215
(614) 236-6317
http://www.law.capital.edu/Faculty/Bios/bsmith.asp

________________________________
From: election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu on behalf of Larry Levine
Sent: Thu 4/7/2011 7:46 PM
To: election-law
Subject: [EL] Wisc

Lo and behold if the County Clerk in Waukeshaw County, Wisc. didn't find 7,582 lost ballots, all for Prosser. She's applying for the job of Secretary of State in Florida. If people have no confidence in the electoral process it's not because of the candidates and campaigns. It's because of screw ups by elections officials.
Larry

_______________________________________________
election-law mailing list
election-law@mailman.lls.edu
http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law