Subject: [EL] Electionlawblog news and commentary 4/18/11
From: Rick Hasen
Date: 4/17/2011, 8:26 PM
To: Election Law

April 17, 2011

"You Get the Judges You Pay For"

Erwin Chemerinksy and James Sample have written this must-read oped in the NY Times, which begins: "LEGAL elites must come to terms with a reality driven by the grass-roots electorate: judicial elections are here to stay. Given this reality, we should focus on balancing important First Amendment rights to financially support campaigns with due process concerns about fair trials." The authors argue that the Court should recognize the constitutionality of spending limits in judicial elections. (More from Sample on some of the points in this oped here.)

While I agree with the first part of the thesis (judicial elections are here to stay, and indeed very popular---the movement to appointment procedures don't seem to be making headway), I have a hard time believing that the current Supreme Court would be open to an argument for spending limits in judicial elections. In Citizens United, Justice at Stake made an excellent pitch in an amicus brief for the Court to leave the constitutionality of spending limits open in judicial elections, especially given Caperton. Justice Kennedy didn't bite then, even writing an unconvincing attempt to distinguish Caperton in CU, and I'm skeptical about whether he'd ever entertain the argument.

Posted by Rick Hasen at 08:25 PM

Shorter John Fund

The incompetence of the Wisconsin election official in the WI Supreme Court race shows why we need stricter voter i.d. laws.

Posted by Rick Hasen at 08:11 PM

"Steven Greenhut: How to dilute the power of politicians"

See this column in the OC Register, which describes Michael Warnken's crusade for smaller legislative districts.

Posted by Rick Hasen at 08:03 PM

"Oregon Capitol mystery: Who wants to kill the Independent Party?"

Jeff Mapes: "Nobody wants to claim credit for a bill that would neuter the Independent Party by saying it could no longer use the word 'independent.' That's like telling a showgirl she can stay in the business as long as she wears a burka."

Posted by Rick Hasen at 07:57 PM

"Did Marge have a bake sale or did Monty Burns write a check?"

By Ciara Torres-Spelliscy has written this oped for Oregon Live.

Posted by Rick Hasen at 07:52 PM

"Arizona 'Birther' Bill Faces Legal Challenges"

The Arizona Republic offers this report.

Posted by Rick Hasen at 07:48 PM

"Supreme Court case weighs conflict of interest"

USA Today offers this report. [Disclosure: I am one of the lawyers for Mr. Carrigan.]

Posted by Rick Hasen at 07:43 PM

April 15, 2011

"Clean Election Supporters Question McComish's Credibility"

See here (via Doug Pennington).

Posted by Rick Hasen at 09:08 PM

"McDonnell vetoes state legislative redistricting bill"

WaPo reports.

Posted by Rick Hasen at 08:48 PM

"Ariz. plows controversial ground with birther bill"

AP offers this report.

Posted by Rick Hasen at 08:13 PM
--
Rick Hasen
Visiting Professor
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen@law.uci.edu

William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law
Loyola Law School
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org