Subject: Re: [EL] Electionlawblog news and commentary 5/11/11
From: Ellen Aprill
Date: 5/11/2011, 8:14 AM
To: Beth Kingsley
CC: Election Law <election-law@mailman.lls.edu>

The constitutional arguments seem weak to me -- for income tax purposes we require that contributions for campaign intervention (and in most cases for lobbying) come from after-tax income; we do not say that the constitution requires that these contributions be deductible so that no tax is imposed.  We tax newspapers along with other corporations (if they have taxable income which they may not these days).  Not all 501(c0(4) organizations are involved in campaign intervention.  Those contributors who want protection from the gift tax have the option of contributing to a PAC or other organization subject to section 527, an alternative channel free of this transfer tax - and the Supreme Court upheld the alternative channel approach in Regan v. Taxation with Representation.  
 
I'd love to hear others on why taxing c-4's is unconstitutional.  I have read Rhomberg article and did not find it convincing. It did not rely on tax cases.
 
  Ellen
 
Ellen Aprill
John E. Anderson Professor of Tax Law
Loyola Law School

----- Original Message -----
From: Beth Kingsley <bkingsley@harmoncurran.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 5:31 am
Subject: Re: [EL] Electionlawblog news and commentary 5/11/11
To: Lloyd Mayer <lmayer@nd.edu>, Election Law <election-law@mailman.lls.edu>


> It is also worth noting that this initiative seems to be coming out of the Estate and Gift Tax section of the IRS, not from the Exempt Organizations people.  I suspect they have no idea what they may be stepping into, and how hot an issue this may be, as estate and gift tax is not usually mixed up with politics.  Just guessing, but I don’t imagine they have even considered there could be constitutional implications to their attempt to collect this tax. 

 

> It will be fascinating to see how this develops. 

 

> Beth

 

 

> Elizabeth Kingsley
> Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, LLP
> 1726 M St., NW
> Suite 600
> Washington, DC 20036
> 202-328-3500

 

 

> From: election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu [mailto:election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu] On Behalf Of Lloyd Mayer
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 7:16 AM
> To: Election Law
> Subject: Re: [EL] Electionlawblog news and commentary 5/11/11



 

> This issue has been around for decades, but as related in the Ben Smith column and also discussed at last week’s ABA Tax Section meeting the IRS appears to have finally decided to pursue it through audits of a number of large donors to section 501(c)(4) organizations.  Since those donors are reported to the IRS on the non-public Schedule B to the Form 990 filed by section 501(c)(4) organizations, the donors are not hard for the IRS to find.  The most significant effect for 2012 will probably be a chilling one.  There are numerous grounds for challenging application of the gift tax in this context (see two articles by Barbara Rhomberg, one relating to constitutional issues and one relating to other legal issues).  But many of these donors may not want to risk an IRS audit, much less public litigation with the IRS that would reveal not only their identities but the extent of their gifts.  Some lawyers may also find themselves in trouble, because it is easier to challenge application of the gift tax depending on how the “donation” is structured.  For example, if it is structured to more closely resemble a payment for services than a gift, the IRS would find it hard to apply the gift tax.

 

> Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer

> Associate Professor

> Notre Dame Law School

> P.O. Box 780

> Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780

> Phone: (574) 631-8057

> Fax: (574) 631-4197

> Web Bio: http://law.nd.edu/faculty/lloyd-hitoshi-mayer

> SSRN Author Page: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=504775

 

 

 

> From: election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu [mailto:election-law-bounces@mailman.lls.edu] On Behalf Of Rick Hasen
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 12:55 AM
> To: Election Law
> Subject: [EL] Electionlawblog news and commentary 5/11/11

 

> May 10, 2011

"IRS gift tax move could hit new anonymous groups"

> Ben Smith notes a very interesting development with potentially important implications for 2012. What say you, tax/election law people?

> Posted by Rick Hasen at 09:52 PM

 



> _______________________________________________
> election-law mailing list
> election-law@mailman.lls.edu
> http://mailman.lls.edu/mailman/listinfo/election-law

Ellen P. Aprill
John E. Anderson Professor of Tax Law
Loyola Law School
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, California 90015
Telephone: 213.736.1157
Fax: 213,380.3769
Ellen.Aprill@lls.edu
http://www.lls.edu/academics/faculty/aprill.html

Ellen P. Aprill <ellen.aprill@lls.edu>
John E. Anderson Professor of Tax Law
Loyola Law School