[EL] Check out Postal Worker Unions | Tea Party Group | Mail Service | Th...

BZall at aol.com BZall at aol.com
Fri Sep 30 09:32:11 PDT 2011


Sure, and the FEC's repeated position that more than one contact of a  
political donor is harassment and prohibited by federal law? AO 2003-24  
(Tobacco-Free Kids); MUR 5265 (Aristotle) 5/19/2010.  
 
Barnaby Zall
Of Counsel
Weinberg, Jacobs & Tolani,  LLP
11300 Rockville Pike, Suite 1200
Rockville, MD 20852
301-231-6943  (direct dial)
_www.wjlaw.com_ (http://www.wj/) 
bzall at aol.com



_____________________________________________________________
U.S.  Treasury Circular 230 Notice

Any U.S. federal tax advice included in this  communication (including
any attachments) was not intended or written to be  used, and cannot be
used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding U.S. federal  tax-related penalties
or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another  party any
tax-related matter addressed  herein.
_____________________________________________________________
Confidentiality

The  information contained in this communication may be confidential, is 
intended  only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally 
 
privileged. It is not intended as legal advice, and may not be relied upon  
or used as legal advice. Nor does this communication establish an attorney  
client relationship between us. If the reader of this message is not the  
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,  
distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is  
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,  
please re-send this communication to the sender and delete the original  
message and any copy of it from your computer system. Thank  you.
______________________________________________________________   

 
In a message dated 9/30/2011 10:27:33 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
jbirkenstock at capdale.com writes:

So, some  people with the Tea Party undertook some political activity, and 
in response  some other people wrote them letters?  Which is therefore, 
necessarily  and without more, "harassment" of the folks in the Tea Party?   
Seriously?  

Wow, Scalia was right, this *really* does not  resemble the home of the  
brave...


________________________________
Joseph M. Birkenstock,  Esq.
Caplin & Drysdale, Chtd.
One Thomas Circle, NW
Washington,  DC 20005
(202) 862-7836
www.capdale.com/jbirkenstock
*also admitted  to practice in CA


________________________________

From:  law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu on behalf of John  
Tanner
Sent: Fri 9/30/2011 9:56 AM
To: JBoppjr at aol.com
Cc:  law-election at uci.edu
Subject: Re: [EL] Check out Postal Worker Unions | Tea  Party Group | Mail 
Service | The Daily C


LL Bean does the same  thing to me


On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:48 AM,  <JBoppjr at aol.com> wrote:




Click here: Postal Worker Unions | Tea Party Group | Mail  Service | The 
Daily Caller  
<http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/30/going-postal-mail-worker-unions-overload-tea-party-group-with-more-than-100-pounds-of-mail/>   

Another example of harassment by  union/government workers This is why 
people fear disclosure of their political  activity.  Jim Bopp

_______________________________________________
Law-election  mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election




<- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  - - - - - - ->
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the  IRS, 
we inform you that, unless specifically indicated otherwise, 
any  tax advice contained in this communication (including any 
attachments) was  not intended or written to be used, and 
cannot be used, for the purpose of  (i) avoiding tax-related 
penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or  (ii)  promoting, 
marketing, or recommending to another party any  tax-related 
matter addressed herein. 

This message is for the use  of the intended recipient only.  It is
from a law firm and may contain  information that is privileged and
confidential.  If you are not the  intended recipient any disclosure,
copying, future distribution, or use of  this communication is
prohibited.  If you have received this  communication in error, please
advise us by return e-mail, or if you have  received this communication
by fax advise us by telephone and  delete/destroy the  document.
_______________________________________________
Law-election  mailing  list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20110930/4d742798/attachment.html>


View list directory