[EL] Check out Postal Worker Unions | Tea Party Group | Mail Service | Th...
BZall at aol.com
BZall at aol.com
Fri Sep 30 09:32:11 PDT 2011
Sure, and the FEC's repeated position that more than one contact of a
political donor is harassment and prohibited by federal law? AO 2003-24
(Tobacco-Free Kids); MUR 5265 (Aristotle) 5/19/2010.
Barnaby Zall
Of Counsel
Weinberg, Jacobs & Tolani, LLP
11300 Rockville Pike, Suite 1200
Rockville, MD 20852
301-231-6943 (direct dial)
_www.wjlaw.com_ (http://www.wj/)
bzall at aol.com
_____________________________________________________________
U.S. Treasury Circular 230 Notice
Any U.S. federal tax advice included in this communication (including
any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be
used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding U.S. federal tax-related penalties
or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
tax-related matter addressed herein.
_____________________________________________________________
Confidentiality
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged. It is not intended as legal advice, and may not be relied upon
or used as legal advice. Nor does this communication establish an attorney
client relationship between us. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please re-send this communication to the sender and delete the original
message and any copy of it from your computer system. Thank you.
______________________________________________________________
In a message dated 9/30/2011 10:27:33 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
jbirkenstock at capdale.com writes:
So, some people with the Tea Party undertook some political activity, and
in response some other people wrote them letters? Which is therefore,
necessarily and without more, "harassment" of the folks in the Tea Party?
Seriously?
Wow, Scalia was right, this *really* does not resemble the home of the
brave...
________________________________
Joseph M. Birkenstock, Esq.
Caplin & Drysdale, Chtd.
One Thomas Circle, NW
Washington, DC 20005
(202) 862-7836
www.capdale.com/jbirkenstock
*also admitted to practice in CA
________________________________
From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu on behalf of John
Tanner
Sent: Fri 9/30/2011 9:56 AM
To: JBoppjr at aol.com
Cc: law-election at uci.edu
Subject: Re: [EL] Check out Postal Worker Unions | Tea Party Group | Mail
Service | The Daily C
LL Bean does the same thing to me
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:48 AM, <JBoppjr at aol.com> wrote:
Click here: Postal Worker Unions | Tea Party Group | Mail Service | The
Daily Caller
<http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/30/going-postal-mail-worker-unions-overload-tea-party-group-with-more-than-100-pounds-of-mail/>
Another example of harassment by union/government workers This is why
people fear disclosure of their political activity. Jim Bopp
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
<- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ->
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS,
we inform you that, unless specifically indicated otherwise,
any tax advice contained in this communication (including any
attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and
cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related
penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting,
marketing, or recommending to another party any tax-related
matter addressed herein.
This message is for the use of the intended recipient only. It is
from a law firm and may contain information that is privileged and
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient any disclosure,
copying, future distribution, or use of this communication is
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
advise us by return e-mail, or if you have received this communication
by fax advise us by telephone and delete/destroy the document.
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20110930/4d742798/attachment.html>
View list directory