[EL] When Capitalists Need Socialist Workers
Steve Hoersting
hoersting at gmail.com
Fri Jul 20 06:39:23 PDT 2012
Kim Strassel's latest:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444464304577537233908744496.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop
And it's applicability to election law:
http://www.nationalreview.com/blogs/print/266623
Kim asks this question at the end: "As for Mr. VanderSloot, to what
authority should he appeal if he believes this to be politically
motivated—given the Justice Department on down is also controlled by the
man who targeted him?"
The answer, for Mr. VanderSloot, is, realistically and unfortunately, "to
no authority; none."
But for those businessmen who are yet safely anonymous, and understand
speaking in the political process is their only remedy against economic
deprivations from an unchecked IPAB or Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
sure to come, the authority to which they should appeal is the district
court.
Businessmen who don't want to be the "next" Frank VanderSloot should file
in district court as John Does to seek the *Socialist Workers* exemption to
compelled disclosure of their partial funding of independent political
speech.
--
Stephen M. Hoersting
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20120720/66bd5136/attachment.html>
View list directory