[EL] Oregon SoS Demands that Postal Service Stop Delivering Ballots with Insufficient Postage?

[Doug Hess]

"Not accepting" as in refusing to receive them, however that is done, or as
in destroying or tossing them? Or "not accepting" to mean they accept them
but plan to not count them?

Douglas R. Hess, PhD


On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Dan Meek <dan at meek.net> wrote:

>  We know that some county clerks are currently not accepting the ballots
> postage due.
>
>   Dan Meek
>  503-293-9021 dan at meek.net 866-926-9646 fax
>
>
> On 11/3/2012 12:50 PM, Doug Hess wrote:
>  In the letter on this issue the Post Master General (should we call him
> General, too?) points out that the state doesn't have to accept or count
> ballots arriving without sufficient postage (see second to last paragraph
> in letter in link below).
>
>  Not sure why he felt that was an area he needs to opine on! But it does
> raise the possibility that some county clerks, or whomever, won't count
> these ballots, now that they know that the USP will keep delivering them.
> Anybody sense a county might do that?
>
>  Where's Paul Gronke when you need him?
>
>  http://indparty.com/postmaster.pdf
>
> Douglas R. Hess, PhD
> Washington, DC
> ph. 202-277-6400
> douglasrhess at gmail.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing listLaw-election at department-lists.uci.eduhttp://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20121103/bce500ae/attachment.html>