[EL] is it seemly for Justice Breyer to be pictured in his son's campaign literature?

[Bill Maurer]

Actually, the analogy to the British monarchy is pretty apt, as Justice Breyer's son has an uncle who is a Viscount.  I wonder if the Viscount appears in the advertisements too.

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 3, 2012, at 1:04 PM, "Lowenstein, Daniel" <lowenstein at law.ucla.edu> wrote:

>          I don't see anything wrong with Justice Breyer's picture appearing on a campaign mailing for his son, at least if, as I gather is the case, it is not on one of the attack pieces.  Your analogy to the British monarch seems to me inapt, because just as the Queen would not appear on a campaign mailing, the Prince of Wales (or his siblings) would not run for political office.  It is common for candidates to appear in their campaigns with their families, and it can be taken for granted that the justice, like virtually any other father, "supports" his own son.  For the same reason, the justice would recuse himself from any case in which his son had an interest.
> 
>          It is easy to get too Puritanical about these things.  (I use the term loosely, because as the great historian Edmund Morgan demonstrated in a famous essay many years ago, the Puritans were not as Puritanical as we tend to think.)
> 
>             Best,
> 
>             Daniel H. Lowenstein
>             Director, Center for the Liberal Arts and Free Institutions (CLAFI)
>             UCLA Law School
>             405 Hilgard
>             Los Angeles, California 90095-1476
>             310-825-5148
> 
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Richard Winger <richardwinger at yahoo.com<mailto:richardwinger at yahoo.com>> wrote:
> I live in a California legislative district in which Justice Stephen Breyer's son is one of the two candidates on the November ballot.  The son, Michael Breyer, has sent out at least 4 direct mail pieces.  Two of them picture him with his father.  The caption is "Michael Breyer with dad, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, and mom, Joanna Breyer."
> 
> The other two pieces are attack pieces on Michael Breyer's opponent.  The opponent is San Francisco's Assessor, and the Breyer attack pieces claim the Assessor is corrupt.
> 
> Both candidates are on the ballot as Democrats.
> 
> It makes me queasy seeing Justice Breyer on campaign literature, even if the candidate is his son.  In a sense, U.S. Supreme Court Justices are the U.S. equivalent of British royalty.  The queen doesn't even vote, and it would be unthinkable for any member of the royal family to appear in on campaign literature for a candidate for House of Commons or a local partisan election office.  U.S. Supreme Court Justices, like the Queen, are formally part of the national government yet are expected to be non-partisan.
> 
> Richard Winger
> 415-922-9779<tel:415-922-9779>
> PO Box 470296, San Francisco Ca 94147
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election