[EL] Line Standers --not just heroic but Hiatoric
Dan Meek
dan at meek.net
Thu Nov 8 13:11:09 PST 2012
Thomas Cares may assume that in a vote-by-mail system there would be
ballot drop boxes conveniently located for all voters. That is not the
case in Oregon, where in rural areas drop boxes are often 50 miles or
more apart.
And why have special ballot drop boxes, when there are hundreds of
millions of regular mail drop boxes in America, including one at
virtually every residential and business address? A better solution
would be Thomas's recommendation of free postage for all ballots, along
with the Washington approach of counting every ballot that is postmarked
on or before election day.
Dan Meek
503-293-9021 dan at meek.net <mailto:dan at meek.net> 866-926-9646 fax
On 11/8/2012 11:21 AM, Salvador Peralta wrote:
Tom describes exactly the process that exists with respect to vote by
mail as it is presently conducted in Oregon.
Starting in 2012, the USPS is obliged by its own policies to deliver
ballots regardless of whether the ballots have sufficient postage.
Ballots may be returned via the mail or in person to ballot drop sites
located in the counties in which voters reside.
Voters who lose their ballots may request a provisional ballot at their
local county clerk's office.
On the question of fraud or potential fraud, I would hope that some of
the academics on the list will consider conducting a serious study on
the strengths and weaknesses of VBM as it is conducted in Oregon and
Washington. A study recently posted to the list that touched on VBM
versus in-precinct voting struck me and several of the folks I shared it
with as being remarkably short on actual data.
After reading about the various problems around the country -- long
lines; faulty touchscreen machines; poorly trained poll workers;
potential voter initimidation; voters missing from the rolls in their
precinct; ad hoc policies with respect to the handling of provisional
and absentee ballots, etc. -- I imagine that more states will look
toward vote by mail as an alternative, particularly since the cost of
VBM is substantially less than in-precinct polling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Thomas J. Cares <Tom at TomCares.com>
*To:* Election Law <law-election at uci.edu>
*Sent:* Thursday, November 8, 2012 10:36 AM
*Subject:* Re: [EL] Line Standers --not just heroic but Hiatoric
I have doubts that any of the five ideas in the WaPo article Rick link
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/11/08/five-ways-to-cut-long-election-lines/>ed
to would _/dramatically/_ improve wait times.
I wonder if we could do something bigger, like just mail everyone a
vote-by-mail ballot, and have the federal government fully subsidize
return postage for all VBM ballots. Voters could discard the ballots and
vote at the polls as if they'd never received them, or mail them, or
return them to any polling place in their county.
With this, I'd bet less (maybe a great deal less) than one-third of
ballots would actually be filled out at polling places, and that the
overwhelming majority would either mail their ballot or simply drop it
off at a polling place on election day (with the convenience of being
able to go to one near their job, or favorite grocery store, and not
necessarily the one in their home precinct - and not having to wait!).
I suspect the argument against this would be the potential for fraud
(I'm not sure that's meritorious though; diligent implementation could
probably prevent fraud).
There's a good argument for better early voting policies, but a
disadvantage to early voting is that something may happen in the last
days of the campaigns that could cause an (objective) voter to change
their mind on at least one thing on their ballot (I'm a permanent vote
by mail voter, but whenever I'm certain I'm going to be in LA County on
election day, I hold my ballot until the election to allow for that
contingency). It would certainly seem helpful if all voters had the
automatic option to fill out their ballot at home and quickly drop it
off on election day.
Thomas Cares
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Roy Schotland
<schotlan at law.georgetown.edu <mailto:schotlan at law.georgetown.edu>> wrote:
We haven't sung enough about the Line Standers, who stand among the
all-time proof of how much people --as grass-roots as can be-- care
about the Right to Vote.
Roy A. Schotland
Professor Emeritus
Georgetown Law Center
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20121108/78a80b56/attachment.html>
View list directory