[EL] Note of...Tension in AP Piece on Supreme Court?

[Steve Hoersting]

The Court's tilt has everything to do with the listserv so long as campaign
finance and voting rights cases are working their winding their way up --
and they are.

And if it is appropriate for Jeffrey Rosen and Jeff Toobin to comment on
the Court from the Left, I see no reason it cannot be done from a
Libertarian perspective or the Right.

Steve

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu> wrote:

>  This seems to me to be bordering on a fundraising appeal, which is not
> appropriate for this list.  It also has very little to do with the subject
> of this listserv.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Rick
>
> On 10/21/12 6:15 AM, Steve Hoersting wrote:
>
> Last Wednesday, Rick wondered whether AP reporting indicates we've yet to
> see all of the aftermath of the Court's last term.
>
>  http://electionlawblog.org/?p=41906
>
> I've asked a similar question, reduced to this fictional video.
>
>  http://rightsolutions.org/projects/609-2/
>
>  --
> Stephen M. Hoersting
> @Hoersting
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing listLaw-election at department-lists.uci.eduhttp://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
>
> --
> Rick Hasen
> Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
> UC Irvine School of Law
> 401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
> Irvine, CA 92697-8000949.824.3072 - office949.824.0495 - faxrhasen at law.uci.eduhttp://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.htmlhttp://electionlawblog.org
> Now available: The Voting Wars: http://amzn.to/y22ZTv
>
>


-- 
Stephen M. Hoersting
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20121021/8eab71e9/attachment.html>