[EL] ELB News and Commentary 8/2/13
Rick Hasen
rhasen at law.uci.edu
Fri Aug 2 08:54:50 PDT 2013
"Saboteurs in the Potato Salad" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53900>
Posted on August 2, 2013 8:48 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53900>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Tim Egan:
<http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/01/saboteurs-in-the-potato-salad/?ref=politics&_r=0>
Just now, a cell of several hundred people has been dispatched into
the American summer, to picnics, town halls, radio stations,
hospitals and Little League playing fields, with a mission to derail
the economic recovery and drum up support for sabotaging federal
law. They're not terrorists, nor are they agents of a foreign
government. This is your United States Congress, the Republican
House, on recess for the next five weeks.
They even have a master plan
<http://www.scribd.com/doc/152696844/Fighting-Washington-for-All-Americans>,
a 31-page kit put together by the House Republican Conference, for
every member to follow while back home with the folks. It's called
"Fighting Washington for all Americans," and includes a prototype
op-ed piece, with a political version of the line usually reserved
for dumping lovers: "This isn't about me. It's about you."
Here's a sample suggestion, from Page 28, of how to stage a phony
public meeting with business owners...
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53900&title=%E2%80%9CSaboteurs%20in%20the%20Potato%20Salad%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, legislation
and legislatures <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27>, political parties
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>, political polarization
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68> | Comments Off
"The Republican Push to Make it Harder to Vote; Laws like North
Carolina's draconian new voter-ID laws are a solution to a problem
that doesn't exist. But voter backlash could be fierce."
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53896>
Posted on August 2, 2013 8:46 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53896>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Linda Killian has written this article
<http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/08/the-republican-push-to-make-it-harder-to-vote/278289/>for
The Atlantic.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53896&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Republican%20Push%20to%20Make%20it%20Harder%20to%20Vote%3B%20Laws%20like%20North%20Carolina%E2%80%99s%20draconian%20new%20voter-ID%20laws%20are%20a%20solution%20to%20a%20problem%20that%20doesn%E2%80%99t%20exist.%20But%20voter%20backlash%20could%20be%20fierce.%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,
The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments Off
"GOP Telegraphs Mass Filibuster Of Obama's Top Judges"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53893>
Posted on August 2, 2013 8:34 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53893>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
TPM reports
<http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/08/gop-telegraphs-mass-filibuster-of-top-judicial-nominees.php>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53893&title=%E2%80%9CGOP%20Telegraphs%20Mass%20Filibuster%20Of%20Obama%E2%80%99s%20Top%20Judges%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in legislation and legislatures
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27>, political parties
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>, political polarization
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68> | Comments Off
Smith Responds to Gan on McCutcheon
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53890>
Posted on August 2, 2013 8:31 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53890>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
The debate continues.
<http://www.campaignfreedom.org/2013/08/02/the-meaning-of-corruption-a-quick-reply-to-david-gans/>
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53890&title=Smith%20Responds%20to%20Gan%20on%20McCutcheon&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> |
Comments Off
"How Far Will Justice Department Go Over Voting Rights?"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53887>
Posted on August 2, 2013 8:28 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53887>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Stateline reports
<http://www.pewstates.org/projects/stateline/headlines/how-far-will-justice-department-go-over-voting-rights-85899494533>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53887&title=%E2%80%9CHow%20Far%20Will%20Justice%20Department%20Go%20Over%20Voting%20Rights%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in Department of Justice <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26>,
The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments Off
"Right to Vote Needs Federal Protection"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53883>
Posted on August 1, 2013 9:10 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53883>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Steve and Cokie Roberts have written this column
<http://www.albanyherald.com/news/2013/aug/01/right-vote-needs-federal-protection/>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53883&title=%E2%80%9CRight%20to%20Vote%20Needs%20Federal%20Protection%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, Voting
Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments Off
"G.O.P. Rifts Lead Congress to Spending Impasse"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53881>
Posted on August 1, 2013 9:08 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53881>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Front-page NYT
<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/02/us/politics/budget-chief-sees-opening-in-house-gop-infighting.html?ref=politics>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53881&title=%E2%80%9CG.O.P.%20Rifts%20Lead%20Congress%20to%20Spending%20Impasse%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in legislation and legislatures
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27>, political parties
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>, political polarization
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68> | Comments Off
Seals Panel on Election Law <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53878>
Posted on August 1, 2013 7:53 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53878>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Josh Douglas posts the details
<http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2013/08/seals-panel-on-election-law.html>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53878&title=Seals%20Panel%20on%20Election%20Law&description=>
Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1> | Comments Off
Coming Next Monday and Tuesday: Guest Blogger Dan Tokaji
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53875>
Posted on August 1, 2013 4:29 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53875>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
As I do some travelling, the excellent Dan Tokaji
<http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/faculty/tokaji.php> will be taking
the helm.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53875&title=Coming%20Next%20Monday%20and%20Tuesday%3A%20Guest%20Blogger%20Dan%20Tokaji&description=>
Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1> | Comments Off
"Liberal Foundation Distributed Money from Bermuda to Liberal
Nonprofits" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53872>
Posted on August 1, 2013 4:11 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53872>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
The /Washington Free Beacon/ reports.
<http://freebeacon.com/liberal-foundation-distributed-money-from-bermuda-to-liberal-nonprofits/>
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53872&title=%E2%80%9CLiberal%20Foundation%20Distributed%20Money%20from%20Bermuda%20to%20Liberal%20Nonprofits%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, tax law
and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22> | Comments Off
"No, the Obama Campaign Didn't Violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse
Act" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53867>
Posted on August 1, 2013 4:01 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53867>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Orin Kerr weighs in
<http://www.volokh.com/2013/08/01/no-the-obama-campaign-didnt-violate-the-computer-fraud-and-abuse-act/>.
And with that, Stewart Baker's point is totally demolished.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53867&title=%E2%80%9CNo%2C%20the%20Obama%20Campaign%20Didn%E2%80%99t%20Violate%20the%20Computer%20Fraud%20and%20Abuse%20Act%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59> | Comments Off
Texas shows Congress must update the Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53863>
Posted on August 1, 2013 4:00 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53863>
by Spencer Overton <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=17>
Thanks to Rick for inviting me to serve as a regular contributor at the
Election Law Blog!
Click here
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/spencer-overton/texas-shows-congress-must_b_3692068.html>
for my latest at /The Huffington Post/
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/spencer-overton/texas-shows-congress-must_b_3692068.html>.
An excerpt: /"A recent court action against Texas is important, but it
should not fool us into believing that existing laws are sufficient to
protect voting rights. Indeed, the central lesson from Texas is that
Congress must update the Voting Rights Act."/
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53863&title=Texas%20shows%20Congress%20must%20update%20the%20Voting%20Rights%20Act&description=>
Posted in Department of Justice <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26>,
Voting Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Tagged
Department of Justice
<http://electionlawblog.org/?tag=department-of-justice>, preclearance
<http://electionlawblog.org/?tag=preclearance>, Section 3
<http://electionlawblog.org/?tag=section-3>, Shelby County
<http://electionlawblog.org/?tag=shelby-county>, Texas
<http://electionlawblog.org/?tag=texas>, Voting Rights Act
<http://electionlawblog.org/?tag=voting-rights-act> | Comments Off
"The Right's Living Constitution: Brad Smith Edition"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53864>
Posted on August 1, 2013 3:58 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53864>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Gans responds
<http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/2182/right%E2%80%99s-living-constitution-brad-smith-edition>
on McCutcheon.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53864&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Right%E2%80%99s%20Living%20Constitution%3A%20Brad%20Smith%20Edition%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> |
Comments Off
San Diego City Attorney's Office Issues Legal Opinion on Some of the
Vexing Questions in Possible Recall of Mayor Filner
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53860>
Posted on August 1, 2013 3:18 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53860>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Read the careful memo here
<http://www.utsandiego.com/documents/2013/aug/01/city-attorney-recall-opinion/>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53860&title=San%20Diego%20City%20Attorney%E2%80%99s%20Office%20Issues%20Legal%20Opinion%20on%20Some%20of%20the%20Vexing%20Questions%20in%20Possible%20Recall%20of%20Mayor%20Filner&description=>
Posted in recall elections <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=11> |
Comments Off
"How city's legal hurdles make recalls difficult"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53857>
Posted on August 1, 2013 2:17 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53857>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Josh Spivak oped
<http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2013/jul/31/how-city-legal-hurdles-make-recalls-difficult/all/?print>in
UT San Diego.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53857&title=%E2%80%9CHow%20city%E2%80%99s%20legal%20hurdles%20make%20recalls%20difficult%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in recall elections <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=11> |
Comments Off
"Sensenbrenner Sees GOP Support to Rewrite Voting Law"
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53854>
Posted on August 1, 2013 1:45 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53854>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
CQ Roll Call reports
<http://cdn1.cq.com/emailed/72A1NZLZV115hi9VXMWNUdi9jLQ/news-4326187.html>.
I'm skeptical.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53854&title=%E2%80%9CSensenbrenner%20Sees%20GOP%20Support%20to%20Rewrite%20Voting%20Law%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>, Voting
Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments Off
"Obama Probably Did Not Win the 2012 Election by Violating the
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53852>
Posted on August 1, 2013 1:44 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53852>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Ilya Somin blogs
<http://www.volokh.com/2013/08/01/obama-probably-did-not-win-the-2012-election-by-violating-the-computer-fraud-and-abuse-act/>.
See my earlier coverage <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53843>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53852&title=%E2%80%9CObama%20Probably%20Did%20Not%20Win%20the%202012%20Election%20by%20Violating%20the%20Computer%20Fraud%20and%20Abuse%20Act%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59> | Comments Off
"When Congress Refuses to Govern" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53849>
Posted on August 1, 2013 1:05 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53849>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Jonathan Capehart writes
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2013/08/01/when-congress-refuses-to-govern/>
for WaPo's PostPartisan, discussing, among other things, my empirical
research, /End of the Dialogue: Political Polarization, the Supreme
Court and Congress
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2130190>./
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53849&title=%E2%80%9CWhen%20Congress%20Refuses%20to%20Govern%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in legislation and legislatures
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27>, political parties
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>, political polarization
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68>, Supreme Court
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29> | Comments Off
Enforcement of Section 3 of the VRA: The Second Phase?
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53839>
Posted on August 1, 2013 10:33 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53839>
by Richard Pildes <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=7>
As the Department of Justice (DOJ) and other litigants begin to turn to
Section 3 to seek to put specific jurisdictions under judicial
preclearance based on recent judicial findings of intentional
discrimination, it's important to note that Section 3?s text appears to
contemplate this only as a remedial tool in existing litigation.
Because there are not that many active pieces of voting-rights
litigation pending around the country, that would appear to limit the
effective reach of Section 3 --- even if DOJ and the private litigants
succeed in having the courts bail-in Texas under Section 3. I noted
these and other potential procedural obstacles to the use of Section 3
in my initial post. <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=52349>
However, it's possible DOJ (and other litigants) could seek to have
district courts re-open judgments in prior cases from the last decade or
so. Rule 60(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure gives district courts
discretion to re-open judgments under certain conditions, including a
"significant change in law" that occurs after the judgment. There is no
question, of course, that /Shelby County /is a significant change of
law. I assume DOJ (or others) would argue that at the prior time, DOJ
had no reason to seek a remedy under Section 3 because the jurisdiction
was already required to preclear its changes by virtue of Section 4 of
the VRA. Now that the Court has held Section 4 unconstitutional, this
change in law provides the justification for DOJ to come back into court
and seek a remedial order under Section 3.
Where would this action potentially be available? First, in any areas
(inside the South or outside) in which courts have found intentional
discrimination in voting and more than one voting-rights violation.
Second, I would assume those violations have to be relatively recent,
whatever that might mean exactly; that is why I said "in the last decade
or so" above.
I don't know how successful this strategy would be (or whether DOJ or
others even contemplate it at this point). One of the leading Supreme
Court cases on point regarding the use of Rule 60(b)(5) to re-open
judgments based on subsequent significant changes in law is /Agostini v.
Felton/, 521 US 203 (1997). Here is a brief excerpt, with quotes and
citations to other Supreme Court decisions, on some of the relevant issues:
In /Rufo/ v. /Inmates of Suffolk County Jail, supra,/
<http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12392850290901513240&hl=en&as_sdt=2,33&as_vis=1>we
held that it is appropriate to grant a Rule 60(b)(5) motion when the
party seeking relief from an injunction or consent decree can show
"a significant change either in factual conditions or in law." A
court may recognize subsequent changes in either statutory or
decisional law. See /Railway Employees/ v. /Wright,/ 364 U. S. 642,
652-653 (1961)
<http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?about=7317607259782596589&hl=en&as_sdt=2,33&as_vis=1>
(consent decree should be vacated under Rule 60(b) in light of
amendments to the Railway Labor Act); /Rufo, supra,/ at 393
<http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12392850290901513240&hl=en&as_sdt=2,33&as_vis=1>
(vacating denial of Rule 60(b)(5) motion and remanding so District
Court could consider whether consent decree should be modified in
light of /Bell/ v. /Wolfish,/ 441 U. S. 520 (1979)
<http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4537162703993098019&hl=en&as_sdt=2,33&as_vis=1>);
/Pasadena City Bd. of Ed./ v. /Spangler,/ 427 U. S. 424, 437-438
(1976)
<http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8860654283576900077&hl=en&as_sdt=2,33&as_vis=1>
(injunction should have been vacated in light of /Swann/ v.
/Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Ed.,/ 402 U. S. 1 (1971)
<http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1624208043358826084&hl=en&as_sdt=2,33&as_vis=1>).
A court errs when it refuses to modify an injunction or consent
decree in light of such changes. See /Wright, supra,/ at 647
<http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?about=7317607259782596589&hl=en&as_sdt=2,33&as_vis=1>
("[T]he court cannot be required to disregard significant changes in
law or facts if it is satisfied that what it has been doing has been
turned through changed circumstances into an instrument of wrong"
(internal quotation marks omitted)).
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53839&title=Enforcement%20of%20Section%203%20of%20the%20VRA%3A%20%20The%20Second%20Phase%3F&description=>
Posted in Uncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1> | Comments Off
Stewart Baker Says Obama Campaign Violated Computer Fraud and Abuse
Act in 2012 Campaign <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53843>
Posted on August 1, 2013 10:25 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53843>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
and he further suggests
<http://www.volokh.com/2013/08/01/did-the-president-win-re-election-by-violating-the-computer-fraud-and-abuse-act/>that
this is how the President won re-election.
I'll let others weigh in on the alleged CFAA violation, something I know
absolutely nothing about.
But I'm quite dubious that alleged violations of Facebook's terms of
service was responsible for electoral college (or for that matter
5-million popular vote) victory. I am even more dubious of Baker's
unsupported suggestion that "Perhaps the campaign, or some official in
the administration, checked quietly with Justice and got an assurance
that its prosecutors would not inconvenience the campaign."
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53843&title=Stewart%20Baker%20Says%20Obama%20Campaign%20Violated%20Computer%20Fraud%20and%20Abuse%20Act%20in%202012%20Campaign&description=>
Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12> | Comments Off
"Baton Rouge redistricting case will test the future of the Voting
Rights Act" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53840>
Posted on August 1, 2013 10:12 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53840>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
This item
<http://www.southernstudies.org/2013/08/baton-rouge-redistricting-case-will-test-the-futur.html>appears
at Facing South.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53840&title=%E2%80%9CBaton%20Rouge%20redistricting%20case%20will%20test%20the%20future%20of%20the%20Voting%20Rights%20Act%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in Voting Rights Act <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> |
Comments Off
Brad Smith on Bauer-Gans Debate Over McCutcheon and Buckley
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53836>
Posted on August 1, 2013 9:25 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53836>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Here
<http://www.campaignfreedom.org/2013/07/31/the-meaning-of-corruption-in-campaign-finance-law-and-buckleys-contributionexpenditure-distinction/>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53836&title=Brad%20Smith%20on%20Bauer-Gans%20Debate%20Over%20McCutcheon%20and%20Buckley&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> |
Comments Off
Pew Data Dispatch on Arizona Provisional Ballots
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53833>
Posted on August 1, 2013 8:44 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=53833>
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Here
<http://www.pewstates.org/research/analysis/2012-election-snapshotarizona-85899494223>.
Share
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D53833&title=Pew%20Data%20Dispatch%20on%20Arizona%20Provisional%20Ballots&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18> |
Comments Off
--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
hhttp://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130802/8a3b4bcd/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130802/8a3b4bcd/attachment.png>
View list directory