[EL] Lessons from “Va. Republicans push re-drawn district map through Senate”

[bzall at aol.com]

Sorry, these were supposed to be two separate links, not one big broken one:

 http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/federal-judges-uphold-marylands-controversial-new-congressional-map/2011/12/23/gIQA7tfVEP_story.html 


http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-11-09/local/35503653_1_legislative-map-congressional-map-single-member.



And I would add that Eliza's most recent on inauguration funding missed the "pay-to-play" money quote (pun intended) from the Administration itself: "Administration officials have said the loosened donation rules were designed to reach out to businesses whose executives felt spurned in the first term and to ease pressure on Democratic donors who feel squeezed dry after the campaign." http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/inauguration/for-top-donors-inauguration-means-access-influence-and-angling-for-next-big-job/2013/01/19/4082a184-60d7-11e2-a389-ee565c81c565_story.html?hpid=z2 



Barnaby Zall 
Of Counsel 
Weinberg, Jacobs & Tolani, LLP 
10411 Motor City Drive, Suite 500
Bethesda, MD 20817
301-231-6943 (direct dial) 
bzall at aol.com 
_____________________________________________________________ 
U.S. Treasury Circular 230 Notice 

Any U.S. federal tax advice included in this communication (including 
any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be 
used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding U.S. federal tax-related penalties 
or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any 
tax-related matter addressed herein. 
_____________________________________________________________




 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130122/518fbefa/attachment.html>