[EL] more news 6/18/13

Rick Hasen rhasen at law.uci.edu
Tue Jun 18 15:07:53 PDT 2013


    "Mike Duggan can't run for Detroit mayor, Michigan appeals court
    rules" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51812>

Posted on June 18, 2013 3:06 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51812> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Detroit Free Press 
<http://www.freep.com/article/20130618/NEWS06/306180099>: "Former 
Detroit Medical Center 
<http://www.freep.com/article/20130618/NEWS06/306180099#> CEO Mike 
Duggan is not eligible to run for mayor of Detroit because he did not 
meet city residency requirements, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled 
today <http://www.freep.com/assets/freep/pdf/C4207094618.PDF>."

I cannot find the dissenting opinion posted anywhere yet.  An appeal to 
the Michigan Supreme Court is still possible.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D51812&title=%E2%80%9CMike%20Duggan%20can%E2%80%99t%20run%20for%20Detroit%20mayor%2C%20Michigan%20appeals%20court%20rules%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, residency 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=38> | Comments Off


    "Common Cause Urges Federal Appeals Court To Declare Filibuster
    Unconstitutional" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51809>

Posted on June 18, 2013 2:51 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51809> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

See this press release 
<http://www.commoncause.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=dkLNK1MQIwG&b=4773613&ct=13181723>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D51809&title=%E2%80%9CCommon%20Cause%20Urges%20Federal%20Appeals%20Court%20To%20Declare%20Filibuster%20Unconstitutional%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in legislation and legislatures 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27> | Comments Off


    "Gift or Gotcha: What to Make of Scalia's Arizona Opinion"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51807>

Posted on June 18, 2013 2:50 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51807> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Janai Nelson blogs 
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/janai-s-nelson/gift-or-gotcha-what-to-ma_b_3461045.html>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D51807&title=%E2%80%9CGift%20or%20Gotcha%3A%20What%20to%20Make%20of%20Scalia%E2%80%99s%20Arizona%20Opinion%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in Elections Clause <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=70>, Supreme 
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29> | Comments Off


    Justin Levitt Says Arizona's Road Ahead in Citizenship Documentation
    Case May be Rocky <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51804>

Posted on June 18, 2013 12:05 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51804> 
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

See here <http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/comments/index.php?ID=10825>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D51804&title=Justin%20Levitt%20Says%20Arizona%E2%80%99s%20Road%20Ahead%20in%20Citizenship%20Documentation%20Case%20May%20be%20Rocky&description=>
Posted in Elections Clause <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=70>, Supreme 
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29> | Comments Off


    "Did Scalia add 'virus' to Arizona voting opinion?"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51801>

Posted on June 18, 2013 12:03 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51801> 
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Zack Roth writes 
<http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/06/18/did-scalia-add-virus-to-arizona-voting-opinion/>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D51801&title=%E2%80%9CDid%20Scalia%20add%20%E2%80%98virus%E2%80%99%20to%20Arizona%20voting%20opinion%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, 
Elections Clause <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=70>, Supreme Court 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>, The Voting Wars 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60> | Comments Off


    "FairVote's Fix for Top Two in California"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51798>

Posted on June 18, 2013 10:28 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51798> 
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Fairvote's solution 
<http://www.fairvote.org/fairvote-s-fix-for-top-two-in-california#.UcCYU-s6c3a> 
would be to---surprise!---adopt ranked choice voting.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D51798&title=%E2%80%9CFairVote%E2%80%99s%20Fix%20for%20Top%20Two%20in%20California%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in primaries <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=32> | Comments Off


    Another Answer on Arizona <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51795>

Posted on June 18, 2013 10:26 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51795> 
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

In response my earlier post <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51773> on why 
liberals joined Justice Scalia in the Arizona case, a longtime reader 
writes:

    "I'm open to other ideas."
    They won in the immediate instance, and that's all they cared about.
    Liberals don't care about stare decisis, conservatives do. So any
    victory liberals win is carved in stone, any victory conservatives
    win is written in the sand. Nothing in the decision the liberals
    dislike will stand if they get a fifth liberal vote. So, why should
    they care? It was a meaningless scrap tossed to the conservatives to
    buy the win.
    Arizona will follow this "roadmap", and find every step of it
    contested, to run out the clock until one of the conservatives
    croaks, and five liberals completely re-write every temporary
    victory the conservative majority 'won', not just on this, but
    campaign censorship, the RKBA, every bit of it.
    They have no respect for precedent, so they can make deals never
    meaning to keep them. That's my explanation.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D51795&title=Another%20Answer%20on%20Arizona&description=>
Posted in Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29> | Comments Off


    My SCOTUS Predictions on the Remaining Big 4 Cases
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51792>

Posted on June 18, 2013 10:21 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51792> 
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Here's my chance to get proven wrong rather quickly (rather than over 
years, as is the more common way that academics are proven wrong!).  
These are listed in order from greatest to least confidence.

Shelby County 
<http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/shelby-county-v-holder/?wpmp_switcher=desktop>: 
5-4, striking down the coverage formula of the VRA, and inviting 
Congress to rewrite the coverage formula, which the Court, and everyone 
else, knows Congress won't, effectively ending preclearance under 
section 5 of the Voting Rights Act

Fisher 
<http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/fisher-v-university-of-texas-at-austin/?wpmp_switcher=desktop>: 
4-1-3 with the four conservatives ready to say all affirmative action 
programs privileging race fail under strict scrutiny, with Justice 
Kennedy, for himself alone, not willing to go as far (J. Kagan is recused)

Prop. 8 
<http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/hollingsworth-v-perry/?wpmp_switcher=desktop>: 
5-4 dismissal of writ as improvidently granted based on standing 
(Kennedy with four liberals), with the effect that Prop. 8 is likely 
banned in CA but the issue continues to percolate in the lower courts

DOMA 
<http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/windsor-v-united-states-2/?wpmp_switcher=desktop>: 
Either 6-3 (Kennedy, liberals, Chief) or 5-1-3 (with Chief avoiding 
merits) finding DOMA unconstitutional as applied.

How much would I bet on getting this perfectly right? Not much.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D51792&title=My%20SCOTUS%20Predictions%20on%20the%20Remaining%20Big%204%20Cases&description=>
Posted in Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29> | Comments Off


    More Commentaries on Arizona Case <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51789>

Posted on June 18, 2013 10:11 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51789> 
by Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Derek Muller 
<http://excessofdemocracy.com/blog/2013/6/voter-qualifications-and-the-power-to-enforce-those-qualifications>

Joey Fishkin 
<http://balkin.blogspot.com/2013/06/federal-power-over-elections-hydraulics.html>

David Gans 
<http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/2066/cac-victory-arizona-v-inter-tribal-council-supreme-court-reaffirms-broad-power>

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D51789&title=More%20Commentaries%20on%20Arizona%20Case&description=>
Posted in Elections Clause <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=70>, Supreme 
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>, The Voting Wars 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60> | Comments Off


    "6 Things We Just Learned About The IRS Scandal"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51786>

Posted on June 18, 2013 9:56 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51786> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Must-read 
<http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2013/06/18/193086191/6-things-we-just-learned-about-the-irs-scandal?ft=1&f=1014> 
from NPR's Tamara Keith.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D51786&title=%E2%80%9C6%20Things%20We%20Just%20Learned%20About%20The%20IRS%20Scandal%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, tax law 
and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22> | Comments Off


    "The voting wars and the Supreme Court: a pre-ruling primer"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51783>

Posted on June 18, 2013 9:17 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51783> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

The Columbia Journalism Review reports 
<http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/the_voting_rights_act_and_the.php?page=all> 
on how to follow Shelby County.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D51783&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20voting%20wars%20and%20the%20Supreme%20Court%3A%20a%20pre-ruling%20primer%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>, The Voting 
Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, Voting Rights Act 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments Off


    Must Read SCOTUS Bar Story by Joan Biskupic
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51780>

Posted on June 18, 2013 9:13 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51780> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Just read this. 
<http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/18/us-usa-court-coterie-special-report-idUSBRE95H0DD20130618>

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D51780&title=Must%20Read%20SCOTUS%20Bar%20Story%20by%20Joan%20Biskupic&description=>
Posted in Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29> | Comments Off


    "Arizona's Proof-of-Citizenship Requirement for Voters Struck Down"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51777>

Posted on June 18, 2013 9:08 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51777> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Governing reports 
<http://www.governing.com/topics/public-justice-safety/gov-scotus-supreme-court-rejects-arizona-proof-citizenship-requirement-federal-voter-registration.html>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D51777&title=%E2%80%9CArizona%E2%80%99s%20Proof-of-Citizenship%20Requirement%20for%20Voters%20Struck%20Down%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in Elections Clause <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=70>, Supreme 
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29> | Comments Off

-- 
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130618/325edfa0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: icon1.png
Type: image/png
Size: 239 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130618/325edfa0/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130618/325edfa0/attachment-0001.png>


View list directory