[EL] big IRS story

[Joe La Rue]

The anger should be there, regardless. NOBODY should be targeted by the IRS
because of his or her political views. It doesn't matter to me whether they
are targeting conservatives only, liberals only, or conservatives AND
liberals together. And it shouldn't matter to anyone else who claims to
love freedom. If the government can target us because of our political
views, and can subject us to extra scrutiny and make us jump through
extensive hoops because of we have political views, then what have we
become?


Joe
___________________
*Joseph E. La Rue*
cell: 480.272.2715
email: joseph.e.larue at gmail.com


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information or otherwise be protected by law. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender
and permanently delete the message.

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION/ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Any tax advice contained in this communication
was not written and is not intended to be used for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting,
marketing, or recommending any transaction or matter addressed herein.



On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Byron Tau <btau at politico.com> wrote:

>  I think the anger comes from the fact that they were just flagging
> conservative-linked words. If the list also included "progressive" and
> "liberal," I don't think the anger would be there.
>
>  --****
>
> Byron Tau****
>
> Lobbying and influence reporter || POLITICO****
>
> c: 202-441-1171****
>
> d: 703-341-4610****
>
> Follow: @byrontau <http://twitter.com/byrontau>****
>
> Subscribe to: http://www.politico.com/politicoinfluence/****
>
>
>
> On May 10, 2013, at 6:03 PM, "john.k.tanner at gmail.com" <
> john.k.tanner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Both are common adjectives for advocacy groups as well as the names of
> political parties.   ADA, SDS, ....
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Schmitt <schmitt.mark at gmail.com>
> Sender: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu
> Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 17:47:50
> To: law-election at uci.edu<law-election at uci.edu>
> Subject: Re: [EL] big IRS story
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130510/c4264ed0/attachment.html>