[EL] ELB New and Commentary 5/20/13

Rick Hasen rhasen at law.uci.edu
Mon May 20 07:38:17 PDT 2013


<http://electionlawblog.org/>


    Nice Touch <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50686>

Posted on May 20, 2013 7:30 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50686> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Chief Justice Roberts cites Justice Kagan's and Justice Breyer's 
academic writings against them in his dissent in today's important 
statutory interpretation opinion on Chevron deference, /Arlington v. FCC 
<http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-1545_1b7d.pdf>. /See page 
3 of the dissent (p. 29 of pdf).

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D50686&title=Nice%20Touch&description=>
Posted in Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29> | Comments Off


    Supreme Court Summarily Affirms in Mississippi Redistricting Case
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50683>

Posted on May 20, 2013 7:23 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50683> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Here <http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/052013zor_m6io.pdf> 
is the order list and here's the background 
<http://redistricting.lls.edu/cases.php#MS> from Justin Levitt's All 
About Redistricting site.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D50683&title=Supreme%20Court%20Summarily%20Affirms%20in%20Mississippi%20Redistricting%20Case&description=>
Posted in redistricting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6>, Supreme 
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>, Voting Rights Act 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15> | Comments Off


    "A bushel of Pinocchios for IRS's Lois Lerner"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50680>

Posted on May 20, 2013 7:15 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50680> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WaPo's fact checker 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/a-bushel-of-pinocchios-for-irss-lois-lerner/2013/05/19/771687d2-bfdd-11e2-9b09-1638acc3942e_blog.html> 
gives Lerner Four Pinocchios for a number of statements she made in 
connection with the IRS controversy.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D50680&title=%E2%80%9CA%20bushel%20of%20Pinocchios%20for%20IRS%E2%80%99s%20Lois%20Lerner%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, tax law 
and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22> | Comments Off


    "Time to shed light on disclosure bill"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50678>

Posted on May 20, 2013 7:14 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50678> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

David Keating and Eric Wang 
<http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=12C4CCC7-A8A0-4289-9A78-AD760C4B2BB1>: 
"For a bill supposedly about "disclosure," Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and 
Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) gave surprisingly few details about their 
Follow the Money Act in their POLITICO op-ed, ("Shedding Light on 
Anonymous Ads," 
<http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/bill-tests-truth-in-campaign-ads-91224.html> 
May 13). While they wrote in broad generalities about requiring "full 
transparency on the part of independent political spenders," they had 
already articulated that principle in a Washington Post op-ed last 
December 
<http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-12-27/opinions/36030576_1_corporations-and-political-organizations-federal-political-activity-campaign>. 
Five months later, they now have a completed bill pending in the Senate 
yet shy away from discussing the legislative details. What are they hiding?"

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D50678&title=%E2%80%9CTime%20to%20shed%20light%20on%20disclosure%20bill%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | 
Comments Off


    "IRS probe ignored most influential groups"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50675>

Posted on May 20, 2013 7:11 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50675> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

AP 
<http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_IRS_OUTSIDE_GROUPS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT>: 
"There's an irony in the Internal Revenue Service's crackdown on 
conservative groups. The nation's tax agency has admitted to 
inappropriately scrutinizing smaller tea party organizations that 
applied for tax-exempt status, and senior Treasury Department officials 
were notified in the midst of the 2012 presidential election season that 
an internal investigation was underway. But the IRS largely maintained a 
hands-off policy with the much larger, big-budget organizations on the 
left and right that were most influential in the elections and are 
organized under a section of the tax code that allows them to hide their 
donors."

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D50675&title=%E2%80%9CIRS%20probe%20ignored%20most%20influential%20groups%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, tax law 
and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22> | Comments Off


    Bauer on Samples and Corruption/Separation of Powers
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50672>

Posted on May 20, 2013 7:07 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50672> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Here 
<http://www.moresoftmoneyhardlaw.com/2013/05/corruption-separation-of-powers/>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D50672&title=Bauer%20on%20Samples%20and%20Corruption%2FSeparation%20of%20Powers&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | 
Comments Off


    "I.R.S. Inquiry Status Told to White House in April"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50669>

Posted on May 19, 2013 10:36 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50669> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

NYT reports. 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/20/us/politics/white-house-told-of-irs-scrutiny-of-groups-in-april.html?hp&_r=0>

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D50669&title=%E2%80%9CI.R.S.%20Inquiry%20Status%20Told%20to%20White%20House%20in%20April%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, tax law 
and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22> | Comments Off


    "Is nuclear winter coming to the Senate this summer?"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50666>

Posted on May 19, 2013 9:54 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50666> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Sarah Binder 
<http://themonkeycage.org/2013/05/20/is-nuclear-winter-coming-to-the-senate-this-summer/> 
sees confusion ahead.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D50666&title=%E2%80%9CIs%20nuclear%20winter%20coming%20to%20the%20Senate%20this%20summer%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in legislation and legislatures 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=27>, political parties 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>, political polarization 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68> | Comments Off


    "How the IRS seeded the clouds in 2010 for a political deluge three
    years later" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50663>

Posted on May 19, 2013 7:05 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50663> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WaPo 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-the-irs-seeded-the-clouds-in-2010-for-a-political-deluge-three-years-later/2013/05/19/b707d940-bf10-11e2-97d4-a479289a31f9_story.html>: 
"The story of the IRS's policy of targeting right-leaning groups, which 
played out over several years in Cincinnati, Washington and dozens of 
other cities and towns, was one of a bureaucracy caught in a morass of 
uncertainty and outside pressure. The actions also confirmed the 
suspicions of many conservatives after they had complained for years of 
harassment by the tax agency."

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D50663&title=%E2%80%9CHow%20the%20IRS%20seeded%20the%20clouds%20in%202010%20for%20a%20political%20deluge%20three%20years%20later%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, tax law 
and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22> | Comments Off


    "'Who's going to jail' over IRS scandal? Probably nobody."
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50659>

Posted on May 19, 2013 7:03 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50659> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Aaron Blake writes 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/05/18/whos-going-to-jail-over-irs-scandal-probably-nobody/> 
for WaPo.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D50659&title=%E2%80%9C%E2%80%98Who%E2%80%99s%20going%20to%20jail%E2%80%99%20over%20IRS%20scandal%3F%20Probably%20nobody.%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, tax law 
and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22> | Comments Off


    "Dan Pfeiffer: Legal questions in IRS scandal 'irrelevant' to
    'inexcusable' actions" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50656>

Posted on May 19, 2013 7:00 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50656> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WaPo reports 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/19/dan-pfeiffer-legal-questions-in-irs-scandal-irrelevant-to-inexcusable-actions/?hpid=z1>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D50656&title=%E2%80%9CDan%20Pfeiffer%3A%20Legal%20questions%20in%20IRS%20scandal%20%E2%80%98irrelevant%E2%80%99%20to%20%E2%80%98inexcusable%E2%80%99%20actions%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, tax law 
and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22> | Comments Off


    "Obama's Counsel Told of IRS Audit Findings Weeks Ago"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50654>

Posted on May 19, 2013 6:58 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50654> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WSJ 
<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323648304578493081906824260.html?mod=djemalertNEWS>: 
"The White House's chief lawyer learned weeks ago that an audit of the 
Internal Revenue Service likely would show that agency employees 
inappropriately targeted conservative groups, a senior White House 
official said Sunday. That disclosure has prompted a debate over whether 
the president should have been notified at that time."

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D50654&title=%E2%80%9CObama%E2%80%99s%20Counsel%20Told%20of%20IRS%20Audit%20Findings%20Weeks%20Ago%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, tax law 
and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22> | Comments Off


    "Is Dependence Corruption the Solution to America's Campaign Finance
    Problems?" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50651>

Posted on May 19, 2013 6:56 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=50651> by 
Rick Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Bruce Cain has posted this draft 
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2267187>on SSRN 
(forthcoming, /California Law Review). /Here is the abstract:

    Lawrence Lessig has suggested that the answer to contemporary
    campaign finance issues is reframing it as dependence corruption
    problem. I examine the merits of this approach from a political
    science perspective, and offer an alternative way to look at the
    same problem. Professor Lessig's original intent account rests on
    too many contestable counterfactual assumptions about what the
    Founders would have thought about conditions and political practices
    that they could not have imagined in their day. Moreover, the
    argument that the Constitution's intent is direct popular
    sovereignty alone ignores the Electoral College and US Senate
    elections based on geography. Nonetheless, I suggest that a simpler
    alternative is to think of the problem as one of democratic
    distortion, and that the solution under the current constitutional
    constraints requires continuing efforts to open up donor
    participation to all voters, fixing the broken disclosure system and
    preserving the current system of congestion pricing.

This is a must-read from Bruce, responding toLarry's Jorde lecture 
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2257948>. I 
particularly like Bruce's take on Larry's originalist argument for the 
"dependence corruption" rationale. (For those not following earlier, 
continues a conversation on "dependence corruption" and political 
equality begun with my /Harvard Law Review/ book review 
<http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/126/december12/Book_Review_9410.php> 
of Larry's book, Republic, Lost 
<http://www.amazon.com/Republic-Lost-Money-Corrupts-Congress--/dp/0446576433/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1367256783&sr=8-1&keywords=republic%2C+lost>, 
followed by Larry's reply 
<http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/126/december12/forum_983.php> at 
the /Harvard Law Review //Forum/, and continued with my Response 
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2220851> to be 
published in the /Election Law Journal/.)

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D50651&title=%E2%80%9CIs%20Dependence%20Corruption%20the%20Solution%20to%20America%E2%80%99s%20Campaign%20Finance%20Problems%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10> | 
Comments Off

-- 
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html
http://electionlawblog.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130520/47e5fd0b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130520/47e5fd0b/attachment.png>


View list directory