[EL] ruling in Wisconsin voter id case

[Justin Levitt]

Right, sorry -- that was unclear on my end.  Three separate cases 
_other_ than the one in today's opinion, four cases total.  Two of those 
cases (today's case, and Milwaukee NAACP v. Walker) make (distinct) 
claims under the state constitution; two others (Frank v. Walker and 
Jones v. Deininger) make (distinct) claims under federal law.

On 5/30/2013 10:21 AM, Rick Hasen wrote:
> wouldn't that make 4?
> I was referring to cases making claims under the *state* constitution.
>
> On 5/30/13 10:19 AM, Justin Levitt wrote:
>> Actually, I think that there are _three_ separate cases in Wisconsin 
>> -- one other state case (Milwaukee NAACP  v. Walker), and two federal 
>> cases (Frank v. Walker and Jones v. Deininger, both of which were 
>> waiting for resolution of the state cases).  Each raises slightly 
>> different claims.
>>
>> Justin
>> -- 
>> Justin Levitt
>> Associate Professor of Law
>> Loyola Law School | Los Angeles
>> 919 Albany St.
>> Los Angeles, CA  90015
>> 213-736-7417
>> justin.levitt at lls.edu
>> ssrn.com/author=698321
>> On 5/30/2013 10:10 AM, Rick Hasen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>     Wisconsin Appellate Court Rejects Challenge to Wisconsin Voter
>>>     ID Law <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51119>
>>>
>>> Posted on May 30, 2013 10:08 am 
>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=51119> by Rick Hasen 
>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>>>
>>> Via the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 
>>> <http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/wisconsin-appeals-court-rules-state-voter-photo-id-law-constitutional-b9922473z1-209502451.html> 
>>> comes this ruling of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals 
>>> <http://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97504>.
>>>
>>> This is far from the end of the line. This case can be appealed to 
>>> the state Supreme Court; there is also a separate case (as the Court 
>>> of Appeals acknowledges) raising separate issues. Further, the Court 
>>> of Appeals leaves open the possibility of an additional challenge 
>>> based upon some factfinding of the burdens of the Wisconsin law in a 
>>> new case.
>>>
>>> Nonetheless, as I write in this forthcoming piece in the GW Law 
>>> Review 2012 election law symposium,I expect 
>>> <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2182857>that 
>>> both the Wisconsin and Pennsylvania voter id laws will likely be in 
>>> place for the 2014 and 2016 elections.
>>>
>>> Share 
>>> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D51119&title=Wisconsin%20Appellate%20Court%20Rejects%20Challenge%20to%20Wisconsin%20Voter%20ID%20Law&description=>
>>> Posted in election administration 
>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The Voting Wars 
>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voter id 
>>> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9> | Comments Off
>>> -- 
>>> Rick Hasen
>>> Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
>>> UC Irvine School of Law
>>> 401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
>>> Irvine, CA 92697-8000
>>> 949.824.3072 - office
>>> 949.824.0495 - fax
>>> rhasen at law.uci.edu
>>> http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html
>>> http://electionlawblog.org
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Law-election mailing list
>>> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
>>> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Law-election mailing list
>> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
>> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
> -- 
> Rick Hasen
> Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
> UC Irvine School of Law
> 401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
> Irvine, CA 92697-8000
> 949.824.3072 - office
> 949.824.0495 - fax
> rhasen at law.uci.edu
> http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html
> http://electionlawblog.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130530/dbb57f07/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20130530/dbb57f07/attachment.png>