[EL] ELB News and Commentary 2/20/14

Rick Hasen rhasen at law.uci.edu
Wed Feb 19 21:05:04 PST 2014


    Linda Greenhouse Writes on the Passing of Robert Dahl, and His Views
    of the Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58893>

Posted on February 19, 2014 9:02 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58893>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Worth a read. 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/20/opinion/greenhouse-law-and-politics.html?ref=politics>

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58893&title=Linda%20Greenhouse%20Writes%20on%20the%20Passing%20of%20Robert%20Dahl%2C%20and%20His%20Views%20of%20the%20Supreme%20Court&description=>
Posted in election law biz <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=51>, Supreme 
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    "Battleground Texas Activities Draw Questions"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58891>

Posted on February 19, 2014 8:04 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58891>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Texas Tribune 
<http://www.texastribune.org/2014/02/19/election-officials-question-battleground-activitie/>:

    While saying it had received no complaint against the Democratic
    group Battleground Texas, the office of Texas Secretary of State
    Nandita Berry suggested Wednesday that the group's voter
    registration practices might rise to a "potential level of offense"
    of state election law.

    Battleground Texas strongly disputes breaking any laws and said a
    flap over its registration efforts has Republicans running
    scared. At issue is a videotaped conversation
    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXKwQI_0kDI> with Battleground
    Texas volunteers in Bexar County. It was gathered surreptitiously by
    controversial conservative activist James O'Keefe, who has sent
    people posing as interested volunteers to infiltrate Democratic or
    liberal activist groups, after which he disseminates video that was
    secretly gathered.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58891&title=%E2%80%9CBattleground%20Texas%20Activities%20Draw%20Questions%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, 
The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voter registration 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37>


    "The Campaign Casino: Elections Have Become a Get-Rich-Quick Scheme,
    and the Press Is Missing the Story"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58889>

Posted on February 19, 2014 3:28 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58889>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Lee Aitkin has written a new paper 
<http://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/d83-aitken.pdf> 
for Harvard's Shorenstein Center.  Here is an excerpt 
<http://shorensteincenter.org/2014/02/d83-aitken/>:

    The 2012 campaign cycle was "the greatest windfall" for political
    operatives in American history, Democratic consultant Hank Sheinkopf
    has said---a $6 billion spending frenzy unmatched in U.S. politics.

    So who pocketed all that cash? Most of it went for ads on TV, radio
    and the Internet, of course; media buys are the biggest expense in
    any election. But Kantar Media's Campaign Media Analysis Group,
    which tracks broadcast spending, puts the 2012 total for all media
    at roughly $5 billion, which left another one billion at the
    disposal of the "campaign industrial complex"---that standing army
    of consultants, pollsters, mailers, data gurus and field organizers.

    Did this torrent of money---raised and spent under the new rules of
    the Supreme Court's /Citizens United/ decision---make anyone rich?
    Did it create new financial incentives that changed the way the game
    is played or altered the political discourse? Has it, as some argue,
    bankrolled the polarization of America?

    These legitimate questions are difficult to answer under current
    disclosure laws. And the U.S. press has been oddly complacent about
    that fact, continuing a tradition that puts the financial gains of
    political operatives---who are great sources and valued customers of
    the big media companies---off limits. The presumption seems to be
    that these men and women are motivated by ideology and personal
    loyalty, their payoff, if any, just a happy coincidence and a
    private matter.

    But this attitude is woefully out of date now that what /Bloomberg
    Businessweek/ called "a Cayman Islands--style web of nonprofit front
    groups and shell companies" is being used not only to shield donors
    but also to obscure the self-enrichment of the political
    class. [iii] When a consultant can earn millions of dollars in a
    single election cycle by moving nimbly between the campaigns, the
    independent spending groups and the vendors that get their business,
    it's time to revive the Watergate-era mantra, "follow the money."

    The new era of campaign finance is a "real crisis for American
    journalism," /Washington Post/ associate editor Robert Kaiser told
    an audience at Harvard Law School in September, 2013, "and we have
    not risen to the occasion."

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58889&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Campaign%20Casino%3A%20Elections%20Have%20Become%20a%20Get-Rich-Quick%20Scheme%2C%20and%20the%20Press%20Is%20Missing%20the%20Story%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, 
campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, political parties 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>, political polarization 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68>


    "Voters' bill of Rights Blocked in Ohio"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58887>

Posted on February 19, 2014 3:18 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58887>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

MSNBC reports <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/voters-bill-rights-blocked-ohio>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58887&title=%E2%80%9CVoters%E2%80%99%20bill%20of%20Rights%20Blocked%20in%20Ohio%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in direct democracy <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=62>, 
election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The Voting 
Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>


    "New PACs try to elect state election officials"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58885>

Posted on February 19, 2014 2:06 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58885>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

/USA Today /reports. 
<http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/02/19/secretary-of-state-pac/5575097/>

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58885&title=%E2%80%9CNew%20PACs%20try%20to%20elect%20state%20election%20officials%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, 
election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The Voting 
Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>


    "Spending $100m to save the planet is a bad thing for 'sugar daddy'
    politics" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58883>

Posted on February 19, 2014 1:53 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58883>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Andy Kroll writes 
<http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/19/tom-steyer-super-pac-climate-change> 
for /The Guardian./

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58883&title=%E2%80%9CSpending%20%24100m%20to%20save%20the%20planet%20is%20a%20bad%20thing%20for%20%E2%80%98sugar%20daddy%E2%80%99%20politics%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>


    New DEMOS Report: "Millions to the Polls"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58880>

Posted on February 19, 2014 12:35 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58880>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Demos has just released a new report "Millions to the Polls: Practical 
Policies to Fulfill the Freedom to Vote for All Americans 
<http://www.demos.org/millions-polls>" written by Liz Kennedy and J. 
Mijin Cha. It looks at best practices and make recommendations for 
sixteen policies in three areas:

  * *Expanding and Streamlining Voter Registration*
    <http://demos.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=1cee3e038dcaec824486f6354&id=be2a57e1ae&e=313ffe58af>.
  * *Making Voting Work*
    <http://demos.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=1cee3e038dcaec824486f6354&id=4308e0efdd&e=313ffe58af>.
  * *Protecting and Counting Every Vote*
    <http://demos.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=1cee3e038dcaec824486f6354&id=0ae90752ce&e=313ffe58af>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58880&title=New%20DEMOS%20Report%3A%20%E2%80%9CMillions%20to%20the%20Polls%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, 
The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>


    "Unsealed email ties Scott Walker to secret email system"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58878>

Posted on February 19, 2014 12:34 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58878>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

The latest 
<http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/court-set-to-release-emails-documents-tied-to-ex-aide-to-scott-walker-b99208267z1-246128301.html>from 
Wisconsin. MORE 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/20/us/wisconin-political-investigation.html?hp>from 
NYT.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58878&title=%E2%80%9CUnsealed%20email%20ties%20Scott%20Walker%20to%20secret%20email%20system%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, ethics 
investigations <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=42>


    "Kentucky Senate appears poised to approve constitutional amendment
    on felon voting rights" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58876>

Posted on February 19, 2014 11:04 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58876>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Kentucky.com reports 
<http://www.kentucky.com/2014/02/18/3095962/kentucky-senate-appears-poised.html>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58876&title=%E2%80%9CKentucky%20Senate%20appears%20poised%20to%20approve%20constitutional%20amendment%20on%20felon%20voting%20rights%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in felon voting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=66>


    "Responding to Shelby County: A Grand Election Bargain"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58873>

Posted on February 19, 2014 10:27 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58873>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Dan Tokaji has posted this draft 
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2387516>on SSRN 
(forthcoming, /Harvard Law & Policy Review/).  Here is the abstract:

    The immediate reaction to the Supreme Court's decision in Shelby
    County v. Holder was predictably fast, furious, and fissured. Some
    lauded the decision as a long overdue recognition that things really
    have changed in the South since the bad old days of mass
    disenfranchisement, so effectively demolished by the Voting Rights
    Act of 1965 (VRA). Others lamented the Court's unceremonious
    disposal of the civil rights movement's "crown jewel." While there
    is some truth in both perspectives, this article focuses on what
    both sides have largely missed.

    The article argues that Shelby County provides an opportunity for
    Congress to take constructive action to protect the vote for all
    eligible citizens. It proposes a Grand Election Bargain: federal
    legislation that would expand the opportunities for voter
    registration (a priority for Democrats) while requiring voter
    identification (a priority for Republicans) in federal elections.
    The approach suggested here is a necessary complement to the
    race-based remedies available under current law, one that would
    expand the right to vote more generally. It is a proposal for a
    Voting Rights Act that will address the problems of the current
    century rather than those of the last century.

    Despite the improvements over the years, significant gaps in
    registration and participation remain for some demographic groups --
    especially Latinos, Asian Americans, people of limited education and
    income, people with disabilities, and young people. Liberalized
    voter registration rules, particularly same-day registration can
    help include some of those most likely to be left out. The federal
    registration and identification rules proposed here would preempt
    contrary state laws in federal elections. This lies squarely within
    Congress' power under the Elections Clause, as clarified by the
    Court's decision in Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona.

    Part I of the article briefly describes what Shelby County did,
    setting the stage for discussion of the Voting Rights Act's actual
    and perceived effects on election administration. Part II assesses
    what the preclearance regime was doing before Shelby County, showing
    that Section 5 was mostly used to stop vote dilution, but did
    relatively little to stop the new vote denial. Part III examines the
    evidence regarding who votes and who doesn't, as well as the causes
    for low registration and participation among some groups. Part IV
    proposes a Grand Election Bargain that would expand voter
    registration and voter identification in federal elections,
    providing consistent national rules that would trump contrary state
    and local laws, while moving us closer to the ideal of including all
    eligible voters in the electorate.

Can't wait to read this!

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58873&title=%E2%80%9CResponding%20to%20Shelby%20County%3A%20A%20Grand%20Election%20Bargain%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, 
Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>, The Voting Wars 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, Voting Rights Act 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>


    "Reconsidering the Insular Cases" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58871>

Posted on February 19, 2014 9:24 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58871>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Today at Harvard 
<http://hrp.law.harvard.edu/academic/opportunities-for-scholarship/conferences/reconsidering-the-insular-cases/>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58871&title=%E2%80%9CReconsidering%20the%20Insular%20Cases%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in voting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31>


    "Residents And Advocates Sue City Of Cranston Over Redistricting
    Plan That Counts Incarcerated Population As Residents"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58869>

Posted on February 19, 2014 9:23 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58869>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Demos press release. 
<http://www.demos.org/press-release/residents-and-advocates-sue-city-cranston-over-redistricting-plan-counts-incarcerated->

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58869&title=%E2%80%9CResidents%20And%20Advocates%20Sue%20City%20Of%20Cranston%20Over%20Redistricting%20Plan%20That%20Counts%20Incarcerated%20Population%20As%20Residents%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in felon voting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=66>, 
redistricting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6>


    Jonathan Bernstein is Not Worried About Super PAC Coordination
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58867>

Posted on February 19, 2014 7:58 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58867>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

See here 
<http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-18/our-pointless-futile-campaign-finance-regulation.html?alcmpid=view>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58867&title=Jonathan%20Bernstein%20is%20Not%20Worried%20About%20Super%20PAC%20Coordination&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>


    "In NYC, Liberals Want to Let Illegal Aliens Vote and Prosecute the
    Police for Trying to Stop Them" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58865>

Posted on February 19, 2014 7:22 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58865>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

This RNLA blog post 
<http://thereplawyer.blogspot.com/2014/02/in-nyc-liberals-want-to-let-illegal.html> 
links to an important story I missed in the /NY Daily News/: Faced With 
Reports Of "Dead" Voters, NYC Board Of Elections Says Investigate The 
Investigators 
<http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2014/01/faced-with-reports-of-dead-voters-nyc-board-of-elections-says-investigate-the->.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58865&title=%E2%80%9CIn%20NYC%2C%20Liberals%20Want%20to%20Let%20Illegal%20Aliens%20Vote%20and%20Prosecute%20the%20Police%20for%20Trying%20to%20Stop%20Them%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>


    "Once Neglected, Secretaries Of State Step Into The Spotlight"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58863>

Posted on February 19, 2014 7:19 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58863>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Peter Overby reports 
<http://www.npr.org/2014/02/18/279216391/once-neglected-secretaries-of-state-step-into-the-spotlight?ft=1&f=1001&utm_content=socialflow&utm_campaign=nprnews&utm_source=npr&utm_medium=twitter> 
for NPR.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58863&title=%E2%80%9COnce%20Neglected%2C%20Secretaries%20Of%20State%20Step%20Into%20The%20Spotlight%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, 
election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The Voting 
Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>


    "Supreme Court Challenge to WI Dark Money Probe Raises Questions of
    Judicial Ethics" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58861>

Posted on February 19, 2014 7:09 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58861>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Brendan Fischer blogs. 
<http://www.prwatch.org/news/2014/02/12389/new-challenge-john-doe-raises-questions-judicial-ethics>

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58861&title=%E2%80%9CSupreme%20Court%20Challenge%20to%20WI%20Dark%20Money%20Probe%20Raises%20Questions%20of%20Judicial%20Ethics%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>


    "Big-Money Politics Groups Get Clarity From IRS They Hate"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58859>

Posted on February 19, 2014 7:07 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58859>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Bloomberg reports. 
<http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-19/big-money-politics-groups-get-clarity-from-irs-they-hate.html?alcmpid=politics>

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58859&title=%E2%80%9CBig-Money%20Politics%20Groups%20Get%20Clarity%20From%20IRS%20They%20Hate%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, tax law 
and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22>


    "Of Fragmentation and Networks, and the State of Political Parties"
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58857>

Posted on February 19, 2014 7:06 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58857>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Bob Bauer's latest. 
<http://www.moresoftmoneyhardlaw.com/2014/02/fragmentation-networks-state-political-parties/>

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58857&title=%E2%80%9COf%20Fragmentation%20and%20Networks%2C%20and%20the%20State%20of%20Political%20Parties%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, 
political parties <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>, political 
polarization <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68>


    "The Christie scandal everyone overlooked: A $12 million
    self-motivated political scheme" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58855>

Posted on February 19, 2014 7:04 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58855>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

    Rob Richie and Devin McCarthy
    <http://www.salon.com/2014/02/17/the_christie_scandal_everyone_overlooked_a_12_million_self_motivated_political_scheme/>
    in /Salon/:

    We now know that in 2013, the administration of New Jersey Gov.
    Chris Christie at least twice used its executive powers of
    governance for political ends. The story that's received the most
    attention, of course, is high-level Christie aides calling for lane
    closures on the George Washington Bridge, possibly for political
    retribution against the mayor of Fort Lee. But another scandal
    received far less attention: the news that Christie called for a
    costly, self-motivated and unnecessary U.S. Senate special election
    just weeks before Election Day to boost his own vote percentage.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58855&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Christie%20scandal%20everyone%20overlooked%3A%20A%20%2412%20million%20self-motivated%20political%20scheme%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>


    "No Small Stuff (cont.): Ballot Error Costs Pulaski $12,800?
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58853>

Posted on February 19, 2014 6:57 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58853>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

A ChapinBlog 
<http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/electionacademy/2014/02/no_small_stuff_cont_ballot_err.php>.

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58853&title=%E2%80%9CNo%20Small%20Stuff%20%28cont.%29%3A%20Ballot%20Error%20Costs%20Pulaski%20%2412%2C800%E2%80%B3&description=>
Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>


    "Firewall Between Candidates and Super PACs Breaking Down | Rules of
    the Game" <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58851>

Posted on February 19, 2014 6:56 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58851>by Rick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Eliza's latest 
<http://blogs.rollcall.com/beltway-insiders/candidate-super-pac-coordination/>.

I discuss the problems with Super PAC coordination tests in Super PAC 
Contributions, Corruption, and the Coordination Proxy Wars 
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2383452> (newly 
revised draft).

Share 
<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58851&title=%E2%80%9CFirewall%20Between%20Candidates%20and%20Super%20PACs%20Breaking%20Down%20%7C%20Rules%20of%20the%20Game%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>

-- 
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20140219/4c42dec9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20140219/4c42dec9/attachment.png>


View list directory