[EL] Responding to Shelby County
James Blacksher
jblacksher at ns.sympatico.ca
Fri Feb 28 08:37:19 PST 2014
Lani Guinier and I have an article in the upcoming Harvard Law and
Policy Review that is a companion to Dan Tokaji's article calling for
Congressional legislation under the Elections Clause. Our article urges
Congress to rehabilitate the Privileges or Immunities Clause in Section
1 of the Fourteenth Amendment. See
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2400098.
James U. Blacksher
P.O. Box 636
Birmingham, AL 35201
phone: 205-591-7238
fax: 866-845-4395
On 2/19/2014 11:05 PM, Rick Hasen wrote:
>
> Linda Greenhouse Writes on the Passing of Robert Dahl, and His Views
> of the Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58893>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 9:02 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58893>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Worth a read.
> <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/20/opinion/greenhouse-law-and-politics.html?ref=politics>
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58893&title=Linda%20Greenhouse%20Writes%20on%20the%20Passing%20of%20Robert%20Dahl%2C%20and%20His%20Views%20of%20the%20Supreme%20Court&description=>
> Posted in election law biz <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=51>, Supreme
> Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
>
>
> “Battleground Texas Activities Draw Questions”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58891>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 8:04 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58891>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Texas Tribune
> <http://www.texastribune.org/2014/02/19/election-officials-question-battleground-activitie/>:
>
> While saying it had received no complaint against the Democratic
> group Battleground Texas, the office of Texas Secretary of State
> Nandita Berry suggested Wednesday that the group’s voter
> registration practices might rise to a “potential level of offense”
> of state election law.
>
> Battleground Texas strongly disputes breaking any laws and said a
> flap over its registration efforts has Republicans running
> scared. At issue is a videotaped conversation
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXKwQI_0kDI> with Battleground
> Texas volunteers in Bexar County. It was gathered surreptitiously by
> controversial conservative activist James O’Keefe, who has sent
> people posing as interested volunteers to infiltrate Democratic or
> liberal activist groups, after which he disseminates video that was
> secretly gathered.
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58891&title=%E2%80%9CBattleground%20Texas%20Activities%20Draw%20Questions%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,
> The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voter registration
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=37>
>
>
> “The Campaign Casino: Elections Have Become a Get-Rich-Quick Scheme,
> and the Press Is Missing the Story”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58889>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 3:28 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58889>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Lee Aitkin has written a new paper
> <http://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/d83-aitken.pdf>
> for Harvard’s Shorenstein Center. Here is an excerpt
> <http://shorensteincenter.org/2014/02/d83-aitken/>:
>
> The 2012 campaign cycle was “the greatest windfall” for political
> operatives in American history, Democratic consultant Hank Sheinkopf
> has said—a $6 billion spending frenzy unmatched in U.S. politics.
>
> So who pocketed all that cash? Most of it went for ads on TV, radio
> and the Internet, of course; media buys are the biggest expense in
> any election. But Kantar Media’s Campaign Media Analysis Group,
> which tracks broadcast spending, puts the 2012 total for all media
> at roughly $5 billion, which left another one billion at the
> disposal of the “campaign industrial complex”—that standing army of
> consultants, pollsters, mailers, data gurus and field organizers.
>
> Did this torrent of money—raised and spent under the new rules of
> the Supreme Court’s /Citizens United/ decision—make anyone rich? Did
> it create new financial incentives that changed the way the game is
> played or altered the political discourse? Has it, as some argue,
> bankrolled the polarization of America?
>
> These legitimate questions are difficult to answer under current
> disclosure laws. And the U.S. press has been oddly complacent about
> that fact, continuing a tradition that puts the financial gains of
> political operatives—who are great sources and valued customers of
> the big media companies—off limits. The presumption seems to be that
> these men and women are motivated by ideology and personal loyalty,
> their payoff, if any, just a happy coincidence and a private matter.
>
> But this attitude is woefully out of date now that what /Bloomberg
> Businessweek/ called “a Cayman Islands–style web of nonprofit front
> groups and shell companies” is being used not only to shield donors
> but also to obscure the self-enrichment of the political
> class. [iii] When a consultant can earn millions of dollars in a
> single election cycle by moving nimbly between the campaigns, the
> independent spending groups and the vendors that get their business,
> it’s time to revive the Watergate-era mantra, “follow the money.”
>
> The new era of campaign finance is a “real crisis for American
> journalism,” /Washington Post/ associate editor Robert Kaiser told
> an audience at Harvard Law School in September, 2013, “and we have
> not risen to the occasion.”
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58889&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Campaign%20Casino%3A%20Elections%20Have%20Become%20a%20Get-Rich-Quick%20Scheme%2C%20and%20the%20Press%20Is%20Missing%20the%20Story%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,
> campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, political parties
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>, political polarization
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68>
>
>
> “Voters’ bill of Rights Blocked in Ohio”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58887>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 3:18 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58887>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> MSNBC reports <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/voters-bill-rights-blocked-ohio>.
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58887&title=%E2%80%9CVoters%E2%80%99%20bill%20of%20Rights%20Blocked%20in%20Ohio%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in direct democracy <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=62>,
> election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The Voting
> Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> “New PACs try to elect state election officials”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58885>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 2:06 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58885>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> /USA Today /reports.
> <http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/02/19/secretary-of-state-pac/5575097/>
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58885&title=%E2%80%9CNew%20PACs%20try%20to%20elect%20state%20election%20officials%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,
> election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The Voting
> Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> “Spending $100m to save the planet is a bad thing for ‘sugar daddy’
> politics” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58883>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 1:53 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58883>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Andy Kroll writes
> <http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/19/tom-steyer-super-pac-climate-change>
> for /The Guardian./
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58883&title=%E2%80%9CSpending%20%24100m%20to%20save%20the%20planet%20is%20a%20bad%20thing%20for%20%E2%80%98sugar%20daddy%E2%80%99%20politics%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
>
>
> New DEMOS Report: “Millions to the Polls”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58880>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 12:35 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58880>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Demos has just released a new report “Millions to the Polls: Practical
> Policies to Fulfill the Freedom to Vote for All Americans
> <http://www.demos.org/millions-polls>” written by Liz Kennedy and J.
> Mijin Cha. It looks at best practices and make recommendations for
> sixteen policies in three areas:
>
> * *Expanding and Streamlining Voter Registration*
> <http://demos.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=1cee3e038dcaec824486f6354&id=be2a57e1ae&e=313ffe58af>.
> * *Making Voting Work*
> <http://demos.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=1cee3e038dcaec824486f6354&id=4308e0efdd&e=313ffe58af>.
> * *Protecting and Counting Every Vote*
> <http://demos.us6.list-manage.com/track/click?u=1cee3e038dcaec824486f6354&id=0ae90752ce&e=313ffe58af>.
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58880&title=New%20DEMOS%20Report%3A%20%E2%80%9CMillions%20to%20the%20Polls%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,
> The Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> “Unsealed email ties Scott Walker to secret email system”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58878>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 12:34 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58878>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> The latest
> <http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/court-set-to-release-emails-documents-tied-to-ex-aide-to-scott-walker-b99208267z1-246128301.html>from
> Wisconsin. MORE
> <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/20/us/wisconin-political-investigation.html?hp>from
> NYT.
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58878&title=%E2%80%9CUnsealed%20email%20ties%20Scott%20Walker%20to%20secret%20email%20system%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, ethics
> investigations <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=42>
>
>
> “Kentucky Senate appears poised to approve constitutional amendment
> on felon voting rights” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58876>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 11:04 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58876>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Kentucky.com reports
> <http://www.kentucky.com/2014/02/18/3095962/kentucky-senate-appears-poised.html>.
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58876&title=%E2%80%9CKentucky%20Senate%20appears%20poised%20to%20approve%20constitutional%20amendment%20on%20felon%20voting%20rights%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in felon voting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=66>
>
>
> “Responding to Shelby County: A Grand Election Bargain”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58873>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 10:27 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58873>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Dan Tokaji has posted this draft
> <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2387516>on SSRN
> (forthcoming, /Harvard Law & Policy Review/). Here is the abstract:
>
> The immediate reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby
> County v. Holder was predictably fast, furious, and fissured. Some
> lauded the decision as a long overdue recognition that things really
> have changed in the South since the bad old days of mass
> disenfranchisement, so effectively demolished by the Voting Rights
> Act of 1965 (VRA). Others lamented the Court’s unceremonious
> disposal of the civil rights movement’s “crown jewel.” While there
> is some truth in both perspectives, this article focuses on what
> both sides have largely missed.
>
> The article argues that Shelby County provides an opportunity for
> Congress to take constructive action to protect the vote for all
> eligible citizens. It proposes a Grand Election Bargain: federal
> legislation that would expand the opportunities for voter
> registration (a priority for Democrats) while requiring voter
> identification (a priority for Republicans) in federal elections.
> The approach suggested here is a necessary complement to the
> race-based remedies available under current law, one that would
> expand the right to vote more generally. It is a proposal for a
> Voting Rights Act that will address the problems of the current
> century rather than those of the last century.
>
> Despite the improvements over the years, significant gaps in
> registration and participation remain for some demographic groups –
> especially Latinos, Asian Americans, people of limited education and
> income, people with disabilities, and young people. Liberalized
> voter registration rules, particularly same-day registration can
> help include some of those most likely to be left out. The federal
> registration and identification rules proposed here would preempt
> contrary state laws in federal elections. This lies squarely within
> Congress’ power under the Elections Clause, as clarified by the
> Court’s decision in Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona.
>
> Part I of the article briefly describes what Shelby County did,
> setting the stage for discussion of the Voting Rights Act’s actual
> and perceived effects on election administration. Part II assesses
> what the preclearance regime was doing before Shelby County, showing
> that Section 5 was mostly used to stop vote dilution, but did
> relatively little to stop the new vote denial. Part III examines the
> evidence regarding who votes and who doesn’t, as well as the causes
> for low registration and participation among some groups. Part IV
> proposes a Grand Election Bargain that would expand voter
> registration and voter identification in federal elections,
> providing consistent national rules that would trump contrary state
> and local laws, while moving us closer to the ideal of including all
> eligible voters in the electorate.
>
> Can’t wait to read this!
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58873&title=%E2%80%9CResponding%20to%20Shelby%20County%3A%20A%20Grand%20Election%20Bargain%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,
> Supreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>, The Voting Wars
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, Voting Rights Act
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=15>
>
>
> “Reconsidering the Insular Cases” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58871>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 9:24 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58871>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Today at Harvard
> <http://hrp.law.harvard.edu/academic/opportunities-for-scholarship/conferences/reconsidering-the-insular-cases/>.
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58871&title=%E2%80%9CReconsidering%20the%20Insular%20Cases%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in voting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=31>
>
>
> “Residents And Advocates Sue City Of Cranston Over Redistricting
> Plan That Counts Incarcerated Population As Residents”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58869>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 9:23 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58869>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Demos press release.
> <http://www.demos.org/press-release/residents-and-advocates-sue-city-cranston-over-redistricting-plan-counts-incarcerated->
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58869&title=%E2%80%9CResidents%20And%20Advocates%20Sue%20City%20Of%20Cranston%20Over%20Redistricting%20Plan%20That%20Counts%20Incarcerated%20Population%20As%20Residents%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in felon voting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=66>,
> redistricting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6>
>
>
> Jonathan Bernstein is Not Worried About Super PAC Coordination
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58867>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 7:58 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58867>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> See here
> <http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-18/our-pointless-futile-campaign-finance-regulation.html?alcmpid=view>.
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58867&title=Jonathan%20Bernstein%20is%20Not%20Worried%20About%20Super%20PAC%20Coordination&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
>
>
> “In NYC, Liberals Want to Let Illegal Aliens Vote and Prosecute the
> Police for Trying to Stop Them” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58865>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 7:22 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58865>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> This RNLA blog post
> <http://thereplawyer.blogspot.com/2014/02/in-nyc-liberals-want-to-let-illegal.html>
> links to an important story I missed in the /NY Daily News/: Faced With
> Reports Of “Dead” Voters, NYC Board Of Elections Says Investigate The
> Investigators
> <http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2014/01/faced-with-reports-of-dead-voters-nyc-board-of-elections-says-investigate-the->.
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58865&title=%E2%80%9CIn%20NYC%2C%20Liberals%20Want%20to%20Let%20Illegal%20Aliens%20Vote%20and%20Prosecute%20the%20Police%20for%20Trying%20to%20Stop%20Them%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in chicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>
>
>
> “Once Neglected, Secretaries Of State Step Into The Spotlight”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58863>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 7:19 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58863>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Peter Overby reports
> <http://www.npr.org/2014/02/18/279216391/once-neglected-secretaries-of-state-step-into-the-spotlight?ft=1&f=1001&utm_content=socialflow&utm_campaign=nprnews&utm_source=npr&utm_medium=twitter>
> for NPR.
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58863&title=%E2%80%9COnce%20Neglected%2C%20Secretaries%20Of%20State%20Step%20Into%20The%20Spotlight%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,
> election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The Voting
> Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> “Supreme Court Challenge to WI Dark Money Probe Raises Questions of
> Judicial Ethics” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58861>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 7:09 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58861>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Brendan Fischer blogs.
> <http://www.prwatch.org/news/2014/02/12389/new-challenge-john-doe-raises-questions-judicial-ethics>
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58861&title=%E2%80%9CSupreme%20Court%20Challenge%20to%20WI%20Dark%20Money%20Probe%20Raises%20Questions%20of%20Judicial%20Ethics%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
>
>
> “Big-Money Politics Groups Get Clarity From IRS They Hate”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58859>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 7:07 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58859>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Bloomberg reports.
> <http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-19/big-money-politics-groups-get-clarity-from-irs-they-hate.html?alcmpid=politics>
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58859&title=%E2%80%9CBig-Money%20Politics%20Groups%20Get%20Clarity%20From%20IRS%20They%20Hate%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, tax law
> and election law <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=22>
>
>
> “Of Fragmentation and Networks, and the State of Political Parties”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58857>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 7:06 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58857>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Bob Bauer’s latest.
> <http://www.moresoftmoneyhardlaw.com/2014/02/fragmentation-networks-state-political-parties/>
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58857&title=%E2%80%9COf%20Fragmentation%20and%20Networks%2C%20and%20the%20State%20of%20Political%20Parties%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,
> political parties <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>, political
> polarization <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=68>
>
>
> “The Christie scandal everyone overlooked: A $12 million
> self-motivated political scheme” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58855>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 7:04 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58855>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Rob Richie and Devin McCarthy
> <http://www.salon.com/2014/02/17/the_christie_scandal_everyone_overlooked_a_12_million_self_motivated_political_scheme/>
> in /Salon/:
>
> We now know that in 2013, the administration of New Jersey Gov.
> Chris Christie at least twice used its executive powers of
> governance for political ends. The story that’s received the most
> attention, of course, is high-level Christie aides calling for lane
> closures on the George Washington Bridge, possibly for political
> retribution against the mayor of Fort Lee. But another scandal
> received far less attention: the news that Christie called for a
> costly, self-motivated and unnecessary U.S. Senate special election
> just weeks before Election Day to boost his own vote percentage.
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58855&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Christie%20scandal%20everyone%20overlooked%3A%20A%20%2412%20million%20self-motivated%20political%20scheme%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaigns <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>
>
>
> “No Small Stuff (cont.): Ballot Error Costs Pulaski $12,800″
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58853>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 6:57 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58853>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> A ChapinBlog
> <http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/electionacademy/2014/02/no_small_stuff_cont_ballot_err.php>.
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58853&title=%E2%80%9CNo%20Small%20Stuff%20%28cont.%29%3A%20Ballot%20Error%20Costs%20Pulaski%20%2412%2C800%E2%80%B3&description=>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>
>
>
> “Firewall Between Candidates and Super PACs Breaking Down | Rules of
> the Game” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58851>
>
> Posted on February 19, 2014 6:56 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=58851>by Rick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Eliza’s latest
> <http://blogs.rollcall.com/beltway-insiders/candidate-super-pac-coordination/>.
>
> I discuss the problems with Super PAC coordination tests in Super PAC
> Contributions, Corruption, and the Coordination Proxy Wars
> <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2383452> (newly
> revised draft).
>
> Share
> <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D58851&title=%E2%80%9CFirewall%20Between%20Candidates%20and%20Super%20PACs%20Breaking%20Down%20%7C%20Rules%20of%20the%20Game%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted in campaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
>
> --
> Rick Hasen
> Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
> UC Irvine School of Law
> 401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
> Irvine, CA 92697-8000
> 949.824.3072 - office
> 949.824.0495 - fax
> rhasen at law.uci.edu
> http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
> http://electionlawblog.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
View list directory