[EL] The terror of James O'Keefe
Smith, Brad
BSmith at law.capital.edu
Fri Oct 31 10:42:43 PDT 2014
"Or maybe it just shows that campaign workers are woefully ignorant of the voting laws in their localities."
I don't think so John. I don't know if you actually watched the video, but it seems pretty clear that all understand that the intended actions would be illegal. None of them seem to have any doubt that a non-citizen cannot vote. Rather, the campaign workers for the most part take a "well, if you can get away with it, it's not illegal" approach - i.e., go in, show them your incorrectly issued registration card, don't tell them you are not really eligible to vote, and if they don't catch you, it's OK. It ain't shoplifting if no one sees you steal the merchandise.
I do think you are right that campaign workers don't want to alienate anyone, and that may cause them not to want to play the heavy. But presumably, since the person isn't eligible to vote, in these cases alienating the person doesn't much matter.
Again, I wouldn't make to much of this video - but nor do I see any reason to whitewash the attitudes of at least a number of campaign partisans.
Bradley A. Smith
Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault
Professor of Law
Capital University Law School
303 E. Broad St.
Columbus, OH 43215
614.236.6317
http://law.capital.edu/faculty/bios/bsmith.aspx
________________________________
From: John W. Farrell [jfarrell at mccandlishlawyers.com]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 12:24 PM
To: Smith, Brad
Cc: Rick Hasen; law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
Subject: Re: [EL] The terror of James O'Keefe
Or maybe it just shows that campaign workers are woefully ignorant of the voting laws in their localities.
So is the average citizens.
That they don't know if a non-citizen can vote should surprise no one.
He could get equally vaguely embarrassing tape of most Little League managers trying to explain the infield fly rule.
Jay Leno use to have a regular bit getting people on the street to embarrass themselves by demonstrating their ignorance of current events, US history or geography.
Most campaign workers are volunteers.
Few are paid little more than the minimum wage through piecework, i.e., their pay is tied to how many people they register to vote, how many houses they hang lit on etc.
Their guiding ethos is not to alienate anybody. The fastest path to alienation is to tell someone "no, you can't do that." So they avoid saying that every which way they can.
O'Keefe knows this and plays on it to try to create the impression of sinister events where none exists.
A fraudster is a fraudster.
John W. Farrell
Attorney at Law
[McCandlish & Lillard]<http://mccandlishlawyers.com/>
11350 Random Hills Road | Suite 500
Fairfax, Virginia 22030-7421
direct (703) 934-1182 | cell (703) 507-1182
website<http://mccandlishlawyers.com/> | bio<http://mccandlishlawyers.com/attorney/john-w-farrell/> | vCard<http://www.dynasend.com/signatures/vcard/jfarrell-at-mccandlishlawyers.com.vcf> | map<http://maps.google.com/maps?q=11350+Random+Hills+Road,+Fairfax,+VA+22030&hl=en&ll=38.857288,-77.338471&spn=0.028874,0.038409&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=59.206892,78.662109&vpsrc=6&hnear=11350+Random+Hills+Rd,+Fairfax,+Virginia+22030&t=m&z=15> | email<mailto:jfarrell at mccandlishlawyers.com>
[Twitter]<https://twitter.com/mccandlaw>[Facebook]<http://www.facebook.com/McCandlishLillard>[LinkedIn]<http://www.linkedin.com/company/mccandlish-&-lillard-p.c.>[YouTube]<http://www.youtube.com/user/McCandlishLillard>
This email is not intended, nor shall it be deemed, unless otherwise expressly provided in writing, to (1) constitute or provide legal advice or counsel, unless the recipient already has an attorney-client relationship with the firm or me; (2) create an attorney-client relationship; or (3) contain my electronic, or other implied, signature.
On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:52 AM, Smith, Brad wrote:
With a close election, it was inevitable that conservative filmmaker James O¡¯Keefe would bring his hidden cameras and actors to North Carolina.
His goal here: Prove that political campaigns are OK with non-citizens voting in the election. In his new video, a woman poses as a Brazilian-born immigrant who asks campaign volunteers outside early voting sites if she can vote.
She admits to being in the country illegally but says she has a voter registration card. O¡¯Keefe¡¯s premise is riffing off a State Board of Elections audit that found 1,425 registered voters who are likely non-citizens<http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/10/25/5266093/hundreds-flagged-in-audit-of-nc.html>.
O¡¯Keefe didn¡¯t get anyone with major campaigns to take the bait, nor does the video show any poll workers allowing noncitizens to vote. He also doesn¡¯t show anyone in the Triangle, although the video does show O¡¯Keefe entering a Durham County early voting site.
It seems to me we don't know if "O'Keefe didn't get anyone with major campaigns to take the bait." That's probably a safe assumption, because if he had he probably would have shown them on camera. But we don't know that, or know if he even tried. Of course, that's a problem with this style of journalism generally - we don't know if the first 200 attempts failed to entice anyone, or if he filmed the first 5 campaign workers he ran into. Probably somewhere in between?
It seems irrelevant that he didn't get any video of poll workers allowing noncitizens to vote. First, my guess is that it is illegal in NC to video at the polls. Second, how would he have done this? His reporters would have had to commit a crime by trying to vote in the name of another. The reporter goes out of his way to note that O'Keefe pled guilty to entering a federal building under false pretenses in 2010, so maybe we should appreciate that O'Keefe is being more careful about following the law in making his videos. And of course the presumption - the entire set up - is that the illegal voter has a voter registration card and an ID, so presumably the poll worker would allow the person to vote and no one would be the wiser. But how often is this the case? This tells us little or nothing about the magnitude of fraud.
One thing that the video does show is a rather casual attitude by many campaign workers to illegal voting. This certainly does not reflect well on those workers or on politicians generally. It is interesting that he finds a Republican campaign worker who also suggests the non-citizen voting is fine, though this worker for a Republican candidate for Sheriff is asked about the reporter trying to vote for Democratic US Senate candidate Kay Hagan. Another is the campaign of David Kelly, running for a non-partisan office with the endorsement of the current county prosecutor, a Republican. (Don't know Kelly's party). I wonder (and doubt) if O'Keefe tried Republicans with a claimed desire to vote for GOP Senate candidate Tillis). But we might give O'Keefe some credit here - he doesn't appear to have only singled out Democrats.
I make of this exactly what I think it shows: it doesn't show voter fraud, it doesn't even show potential for voter fraud, but it does show that at least some campaign workers have a remarkably casual attitude toward voter fraud. Whether that's worth all the effort to get these videos, and the resulting hullabaloo, I have my doubts, but it is interesting that apparently a fair number of partisans are comfortable with fraud that supports their favored candidates.
Bradley A. Smith
Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault
Professor of Law
Capital University Law School
303 E. Broad St.
Columbus, OH 43215
614.236.6317
http://law.capital.edu/faculty/bios/bsmith.aspx
________________________________
From: law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu> [law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:law-election-bounces at department-lists.uci.edu>] on behalf of Rick Hasen [rhasen at law.uci.edu<mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu>]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 11:17 AM
To: law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
Subject: Re: [EL] ELB News and Commentary 10/31/14
Corrected link for Florida recount story:
http://www.politicalfixflorida.com/2014/10/29/heres-how-florida-would-handle-a-recount/
On 10/31/14, 8:10 AM, Rick Hasen wrote:
¡°Democratic Donors Prepare for Disappointment¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67725>
Posted on October 31, 2014 8:08 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67725> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Ken Vogel writes<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/10/democratic-donors-prepare-for-disappointment-112371.html#.VFOlXF33iDE.twitter> for Politico.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67725&title=%E2%80%9CDemocratic%20Donors%20Prepare%20for%20Disappointment%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, campaigns<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>
¡°Is It Voter Fraud or Voter Suppression in 2014?¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67723>
Posted on October 31, 2014 8:01 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67723> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Jake Flanagin <http://op-talk.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/10/31/voter-suppression-strikes-back-in-2014/> for NYT Op Talk.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67723&title=%E2%80%9CIs%20It%20Voter%20Fraud%20or%20Voter%20Suppression%20in%202014%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The Voting Wars<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
¡°Leading Hispanic Civil Rights Group To Fox News: Encouraging Americans To Vote Is Not ¡®Voter Fraud¡¯¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67721>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:59 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67721> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Media Matters<http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/10/30/leading-hispanic-civil-rights-group-to-fox-news/201393>.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67721&title=%E2%80%9CLeading%20Hispanic%20Civil%20Rights%20Group%20To%20Fox%20News%3A%20Encouraging%20Americans%20To%20Vote%20Is%20Not%20%E2%80%98Voter%20Fraud%E2%80%99%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, fraudulent fraud squad<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>, The Voting Wars<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
¡°Senate Democrats¡¯ Super Lawyer Preps for Overtime¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67719>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:58 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67719> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Nice Roll Call Marc Elias profile<http://atr.rollcall.com/marc-elias-always-preparing-for-democrats-next-big-recount/?dcz=>.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67719&title=%E2%80%9CSenate%20Democrats%E2%80%99%20Super%20Lawyer%20Preps%20for%20Overtime%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election law biz<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=51>, recounts<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=50>
¡°State Attorney General Candidates Cite Concerns Over Political Donations¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67717>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:56 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67717> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
NYT reports<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/01/us/politics/attorney-generals-political-donations-eric-schneiderman-john-cahill.html?ref=politics>.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67717&title=%E2%80%9CState%20Attorney%20General%20Candidates%20Cite%20Concerns%20Over%20Political%20Donations%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, campaigns<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>
¡°Campaigning to Extend, Or End, One Party Rule¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67715>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:55 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67715> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
NYT reports.<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/31/us/politics/campaigning-to-extend-or-end-one-party-rule-.html?ref=politics>
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67715&title=%E2%80%9CCampaigning%20to%20Extend%2C%20Or%20End%2C%20One%20Party%20Rule%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaigns<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, political parties<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>
¡°Undercover conservative filmmaker James O¡¯Keefe releases video in NC¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67713>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:52 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67713> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
News and Observer<http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/10/30/4278698_undercover-conservative-filmmaker.html?rh=1>:
With a close election, it was inevitable that conservative filmmaker James O¡¯Keefe would bring his hidden cameras and actors to North Carolina.
His goal here: Prove that political campaigns are OK with non-citizens voting in the election. In his new video, a woman poses as a Brazilian-born immigrant who asks campaign volunteers outside early voting sites if she can vote.
She admits to being in the country illegally but says she has a voter registration card. O¡¯Keefe¡¯s premise is riffing off a State Board of Elections audit that found 1,425 registered voters who are likely non-citizens<http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/10/25/5266093/hundreds-flagged-in-audit-of-nc.html>.
O¡¯Keefe didn¡¯t get anyone with major campaigns to take the bait, nor does the video show any poll workers allowing noncitizens to vote. He also doesn¡¯t show anyone in the Triangle, although the video does show O¡¯Keefe entering a Durham County early voting site.
MORE from WRAL<http://www.wral.com/conservative-activist-video-shows-campaigns-encouraging-illegal-votes/14131187/>, ABC11<http://abc11.com/news/conservative-activist-releases-hidden-camera-video-appearing-to-show-bad-voting-advice/373990/>.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67713&title=%E2%80%9CUndercover%20conservative%20filmmaker%20James%20O%E2%80%99Keefe%20releases%20video%20in%20NC%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in chicanery<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>, election administration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, fraudulent fraud squad<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>, The Voting Wars<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
New Voting Lawsuit in Ohio<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67711>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:48 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67711> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Release<http://jurist.org/forum/2014/10/charles-rhodes-texas-voterid.php>: ¡°¨C Today, the Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, Columbus Coalition for the Homeless, and Ohio Democratic Party¡ªsuccessful plaintiffs in previous complaints to protect Ohioans¡¯ voting rights¡ªfiled a proposed Second Supplemental Complaint against Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted and Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine asking U.S. District Judge Algenon Marbley of the Southern District of Ohio to declare portions of Ohio Substitute Senate Bills 205 (S.B. 205) and 216 (S.B. 216) invalid for violating the federal Voting Rights Act and the Constitution, risking the disenfranchisement of thousands of Ohio voters who may cast absentee or provisional ballots, and intentionally making it more difficult for many African-American, Latino, and Democractic-Party-member Ohioans to vote.¡±
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67711&title=New%20Voting%20Lawsuit%20in%20Ohio&description=>
Posted in election administration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The Voting Wars<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
¡°State Constitutional First Principles in Challenging the Texas Voter Photo Identification Law¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67709>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:41 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67709> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Charles Rhodes<http://jurist.org/forum/2014/10/charles-rhodes-texas-voterid.php> at Jurist.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67709&title=%E2%80%9CState%20Constitutional%20First%20Principles%20in%20Challenging%20the%20Texas%20Voter%20Photo%20Identification%20Law%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, Supreme Court<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>, The Voting Wars<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>, voter id<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>
¡°Here¡¯s How Florida Would Handle a Recount¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67706>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:34 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67706> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Words<http://electionlawblog.org/Here%E2%80%99s%20how%20Florida%20would%20handle%20a%20recount> that make an election law professor (at least one as old as I am) shudder.
Related: Rick Scott, Charlie Crist ready to lawyer up if Florida recount needed (w/video)<http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundup/the-nightmare-scenario-a-race-for-florida-governor-too-close-to-call/2204063>
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67706&title=%E2%80%9CHere%E2%80%99s%20How%20Florida%20Would%20Handle%20a%20Recount%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, recounts<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=50>, The Voting Wars<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
¡°Against Residency Districts¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67704>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:33 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67704> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Mike Pitts <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2513495> has posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming, University of Chicago Legal Forum). Here is the abstract:
This article argues against laws which mandate that candidates and elected officials reside in a particular geographic area as a condition of election or office-holding (i.e., residency requirements). The article considers various rationales for residency requirements ¡ª some of which have been endorsed by federal and state courts ¡ª and concludes that those rationales by-and-large do not hold up under scrutiny. The article also considers the costs of residency requirements and concludes that the costs of such requirements outweigh any purported benefits. The article then ponders why residency requirements have continued to exist despite weak justifications for their use, and concludes that residency requirements likely persist because they insulate incumbent partisans from electoral competition. As such, a politics as markets approach might suggest the elimination of residency requirements.
Looking forward to reading this! This has been my position, but obviously not (from me) based in a politics as markets approach.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67704&title=%E2%80%9CAgainst%20Residency%20Districts%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in residency<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=38>
¡°Wisconsin election board attorney asks federal judge to dismiss campaign coordination lawsuit¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67702>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:29 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67702> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
AP reports.<http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/280980692.html>
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67702&title=%E2%80%9CWisconsin%20election%20board%20attorney%20asks%20federal%20judge%20to%20dismiss%20campaign%20coordination%20lawsuit%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
¡°At fast-growing Brookings, donors may have an impact on research agenda¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67699>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:25 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67699> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
WaPo reports.<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/at-fast-growing-brookings-donors-help-set-agenda/2014/10/30/a4ba4e8e-48ef-11e4-891d-713f052086a0_story.html?hpid=z1>
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67699&title=%E2%80%9CAt%20fast-growing%20Brookings%2C%20donors%20may%20have%20an%20impact%20on%20research%20agenda%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in lobbying<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=28>
¡°They¡¯re Not Allowed to Talk. But Candidates and PACs Are Brazenly Communicating All the Time.¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67697>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:23 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67697> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Key National Journal piece:<http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/they-re-not-allowed-to-talk-but-candidates-and-pacs-are-brazenly-communicating-all-the-time-20141030>
The Tillis memo shows just how brazen politicians and their allies have become. What started as vaguely outlining ad buys through the media and posting minutes-long ¡°B-roll¡± footage of a candidate on their website has entered a new phase in which campaigns and parties offer insight into their needs as if they were sitting in a boardroom personally explaining it to the men and women who run outside groups.
¡°Because we cannot coordinate, our campaign is often in the position of reacting to things our allies do after they have done them,¡± Shaw wrote, without irony, in the memo. His solution: opening up his own political playbook and trying to indirectly call the plays for his allies.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67697&title=%E2%80%9CThey%E2%80%99re%20Not%20Allowed%20to%20Talk.%20But%20Candidates%20and%20PACs%20Are%20Brazenly%20Communicating%20All%20the%20Time.%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, campaigns<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>
¡°Our View: Ranked-choice petition first step toward reform¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67695>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:18 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67695> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Portland Press Herald<http://www.pressherald.com/2014/10/31/view-ranked-choice/> editorial.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67695&title=%E2%80%9COur%20View%3A%20Ranked-choice%20petition%20first%20step%20toward%20reform%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in alternative voting systems<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=63>
¡°Distress Call? ¡°Embattled¡± DC Board of Elections Under Close Scrutiny on Election Day 2014¡å<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67693>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:14 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67693> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
A ChapinBlog.<http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/electionacademy/2014/10/distress_call_embattled_dc_boa.php>
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67693&title=%E2%80%9CDistress%20Call%3F%20%E2%80%9CEmbattled%E2%80%9D%20DC%20Board%20of%20Elections%20Under%20Close%20Scrutiny%20on%20Election%20Day%202014%E2%80%B3&description=>
Posted in election administration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>
¡°The FEC, the Internet Squabble and the February Hearing¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67691>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:13 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67691> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Bauer blogs.<http://www.moresoftmoneyhardlaw.com/2014/10/fec-internet-squabble-february-hearing/>
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67691&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20FEC%2C%20the%20Internet%20Squabble%20and%20the%20February%20Hearing%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
¡°Alaskans Furious Over ¡®Vote-Shaming¡¯ Letters Sent By Super PAC¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67689>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:11 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67689> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
AP reports<http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/alaskans-vote-shaming-letters>.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67689&title=%E2%80%9CAlaskans%20Furious%20Over%20%E2%80%98Vote-Shaming%E2%80%99%20Letters%20Sent%20By%20Super%20PAC%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaigns<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>
¡°Investigators Probe Silicon Valley Link In Botched Voter Mailer Experiment¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67687>
Posted on October 31, 2014 7:11 am<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67687> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
TPM reports.<http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/stanford-dartmouth-experiment-crowdpac>
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67687&title=%E2%80%9CInvestigators%20Probe%20Silicon%20Valley%20Link%20In%20Botched%20Voter%20Mailer%20Experiment%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election law biz<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=51>
¡°Substantial Majority of Small Business Owners Favor a Multi-Party System for the U.S.¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67685>
Posted on October 30, 2014 3:38 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67685> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
BAN reports.<http://www.ballot-access.org/2014/10/substantial-majority-of-small-business-owners-favor-a-multi-party-system-for-the-u-s/>
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67685&title=%E2%80%9CSubstantial%20Majority%20of%20Small%20Business%20Owners%20Favor%20a%20Multi-Party%20System%20for%20the%20U.S.%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in alternative voting systems<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=63>, political parties<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=25>, third parties<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=47>
¡°North Carolina Campaigns Prepare for Potential Recount¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67683>
Posted on October 30, 2014 3:02 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67683> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Roll Call:<http://atr.rollcall.com/elections-2014-north-carolina-campaigns-prepare-for-potential-recount/>
The competitive North Carolina Senate race will cost more than $100 million by Election Day, and that price tag could climb further as both parties prepare to spend even more if the race becomes too close to call.
The campaigns for both Sen. Kay Hagan, D-N.C., and Republican state Speaker Thom Tillis confirmed to CQ Roll Call they are making preparations in case of a recount in one of the country¡¯s most competitive races. Recent polls show a tied race, and this week the Rothenberg Political Report/Roll Call moved the race to Tossup<http://media.cq.com/pub/2013/race-ratings-rc/?pos=opol> this week from Tilts Democratic.
¡°It¡¯d be kind of silly for us not to [prepare],¡± said Todd Poole, the executive director of the North Carolina Republican Party.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67683&title=%E2%80%9CNorth%20Carolina%20Campaigns%20Prepare%20for%20Potential%20Recount%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, recounts<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=50>, The Voting Wars<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
Read the Petition to South Carolina Supreme Court to Keep Election Going in House Speaker¡¯s District<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67679>
Posted on October 30, 2014 2:41 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67679> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
The South Carolina state election commission had put the election on hold.
Here is the Petition<http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/Appeal-to-SCSC-SLKNb.So_.74.pdf>.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67679&title=Read%20the%20Petition%20to%20South%20Carolina%20Supreme%20Court%20to%20Keep%20Election%20Going%20in%20House%20Speaker%E2%80%99s%20District&description=>
Posted in campaigns<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, election administration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>
¡°New Voting Restrictions Could Swing the 2014 Election¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67676>
Posted on October 30, 2014 2:15 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67676> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Ari Berman writes<http://www.thenation.com/blog/186849/new-voting-restrictions-could-swing-2014-election> for The Nation.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67676&title=%E2%80%9CNew%20Voting%20Restrictions%20Could%20Swing%20the%202014%20Election%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in election administration<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The Voting Wars<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
Must-Read Quote of the Day: Dark Money Edition<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67673>
Posted on October 30, 2014 2:12 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67673> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
¡°¡°People always ask me one question all the time: ¡®How do I know that I won¡¯t be found out as a supporter of what you¡¯re doing?¡¯¡We run all of this stuff through nonprofit organizations that are insulated from having to disclose donors. There is total anonymity. People don¡¯t know who supports us.¡±
¡ªLobbyist Richard Berman,<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/31/us/politics/pr-executives-western-energy-alliance-speech-taped.html?smid=tw-share&_r=0> secretly recorded giving advice to oil and gas industry executives on demonizing their opponents, as provided to Eric Lipton of the NYT.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67673&title=Must-Read%20Quote%20of%20the%20Day%3A%20Dark%20Money%20Edition&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, campaigns<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>
Three Republican FEC Commissioners Ask for Flood of Comments Saying ¡°Hands Off the Internet¡±<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67671>
Posted on October 30, 2014 1:44 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=67671> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Escalating<http://www.fec.gov/members/statements/Goodman_Hunter_Petersen-Statement_Encouraging_Public_Comment.pdf> the battle with Commissioner Ravel over this issue.
<ATT00001.png><https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D67671&title=Three%20Republican%20FEC%20Commissioners%20Ask%20for%20Flood%20of%20Comments%20Saying%20%E2%80%9CHands%20Off%20the%20Internet%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted in campaign finance<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, federal election commission<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24>
--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org
<ATT00001.png>
_______________________________________________
Law-election mailing list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu<mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20141031/c388ff13/attachment.html>
View list directory