[EL] ELB News and Commentary 4/22/15
Rick Hasen
rhasen at law.uci.edu
Wed Apr 22 04:45:14 PDT 2015
“Hillary Clinton Campaign Aims To Raise $100 Million For Primary”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71925>
Posted onApril 22, 2015 4:42 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71925>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
HuffPo reports.
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/21/hillary-clinton-campaign_n_7112800.html?1429660128>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71925&title=%E2%80%9CHillary%20Clinton%20Campaign%20Aims%20To%20Raise%20%24100%20Million%20For%20Primary%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,campaigns
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>
“Death by a Thousand Cuts: How the Supreme Court Has Effectively
Killed Campaign Finance Regulation by Its Limited Recognition of
Compelling State Interests” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71923>
Posted onApril 22, 2015 4:41 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71923>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Kevin Huguelet has postedthis draft
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2589600>on SSRN
(forthcoming /University of Miami Law Review/). Here is the abstract:
This Article examines the current campaign finance jurisprudence in
the United States, with a particular emphasis on the Court’s
recognition of compelling state interests. Given the limited
recognition of compelling state interests, this Article seeks to
question the seemingly arbitrary rationale behind recognition and
explore the implications of minimal acceptance of compelling state
interests. Because the evolution of compelling state interest
recognition has varied greatly, the Court’s recent insistence — that
the state has merely one compelling interest — is troublesome. This
Article provides a comprehensive review of the campaign finance
jurisprudence, then reviews the decisions that created or argued for
additional compelling state interests. Interests that were
considered compelling prior to Citizens United, such as the
anti-distortion interest, remain compelling and hold an important
place in the US campaign finance landscape. This Article attempts to
respond to the current Court’s trend and shed light on the history
of compelling state interest recognition.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71923&title=%E2%80%9CDeath%20by%20a%20Thousand%20Cuts%3A%20How%20the%20Supreme%20Court%20Has%20Effectively%20Killed%20Campaign%20Finance%20Regulation%20by%20Its%20Limited%20Recognition%20of%20Compelling%20State%20Interests%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,Supreme
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
Federal Court Denies TRO for WI Chief Judge Abrahamson in Challenge
to Voter Measure, But Leaves Open Chance for Preliminary Injunction
This Summer <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71921>
Posted onApril 21, 2015 7:17 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71921>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
AP
<http://host.madison.com/news/state-and-regional/judge-declines-to-block-chief-justice-selection-change/article_7d567d3c-a324-5a53-b8c8-6d88c4f0119f.html>;Milwaukee
Journal-Sentinel
<http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/supreme-court-justices-legal-fight-could-bring-big-cost-to-wisconsin-taxpayers-b99485322z1-300788121.html>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71921&title=Federal%20Court%20Denies%20TRO%20for%20WI%20Chief%20Judge%20Abrahamson%20in%20Challenge%20to%20Voter%20Measure%2C%20But%20Leaves%20Open%20Chance%20for%20Preliminary%20Injunction%20This%20Summer&description=>
Posted injudicial elections <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=19>
“Jeb Bush Will Keep His Super-PAC in Line”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71919>
Posted onApril 21, 2015 6:28 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71919>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Jonathan Bernstein
<http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-04-21/jeb-bush-will-keep-his-super-pac-in-line>for
Bloomberg View.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71919&title=%E2%80%9CJeb%20Bush%20Will%20Keep%20His%20Super-PAC%20in%20Line%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
“Super PACs Kill the Presidential Campaign”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71917>
Posted onApril 21, 2015 1:25 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71917>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Frank Wilkinson
<http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-04-21/super-pacs-kill-the-presidential-campaign>for
Bloomberg View.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71917&title=%E2%80%9CSuper%20PACs%20Kill%20the%20Presidential%20Campaign%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
Quote of the Day <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71915>
Posted onApril 21, 2015 1:24 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71915>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
“If I put together a finance team that will make me financially
competitive enough to stay in this thing…I may have the first
all-Jewish cabinet in America because of the pro-Israel
funding,”Graham reportedly said
<http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/04/20/lindsey-graham-on-2016-immigration-and-israel/>,
chuckling.
“Bottom line is, I’ve got a lot of support from the pro-Israel
funding,” he added.
–Sen. Lindsey Graham
<http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/lindsey-graham-all-jewish-cabinet-israel>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71915&title=Quote%20of%20the%20Day&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
“The Next Era of Campaign-Finance Craziness Is Already Underway”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71913>
Posted onApril 21, 2015 1:22 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71913>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Jim Rutenberg
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/21/magazine/the-next-era-of-campaign-finance-craziness-is-already-underway.html?ref=topics&_r=1>for
the NYT magazine.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71913&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20Next%20Era%20of%20Campaign-Finance%20Craziness%20Is%20Already%20Underway%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
“Wisconsin’s Shame: ‘I Thought It Was a Home Invasion’”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71911>
Posted onApril 21, 2015 1:20 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71911>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
National Review
<http://www.nationalreview.com/article/417155/wisconsins-shame-i-thought-it-was-home-invasion-david-french>on
John Doe.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71911&title=%E2%80%9CWisconsin%E2%80%99s%20Shame%3A%20%E2%80%98I%20Thought%20It%20Was%20a%20Home%20Invasion%E2%80%99%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,chicanery
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>
Federal District Court Rejects Challenge to Federal Contribution
Limits <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71909>
Posted onApril 21, 2015 11:57 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71909>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Holmes v. FEC <http://www.fec.gov/law/litigation/holmes_dc_opinion2.pdf>:
After full consideration of the entire record and all arguments, the
Court finds that Plaintiffs’ challenge to FECA’s temporal
per-election restrictions on individual contributions to federal
candidates constitutes a veiled attack on the contribution limit set
by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court as a legitimate means to
combat corruption. Because Plaintiffs’ claims rest on issues of
settled law, the Court will deny Plaintiffs’ motion for
certification and grant FEC’s motion for summary judgment.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71909&title=Federal%20District%20Court%20Rejects%20Challenge%20to%20Federal%20Contribution%20Limits&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
“Struggling to remember the name of Jeb Bush’s super PAC? Here’s
why” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71906>
Posted onApril 21, 2015 7:26 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=71906>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Reuters reports.
<http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/21/us-usa-election-names-idUSKBN0NC0CL20150421>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D71906&title=%E2%80%9CStruggling%20to%20remember%20the%20name%20of%20Jeb%20Bush%E2%80%99s%20super%20PAC%3F%20Here%E2%80%99s%20why%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,campaigns
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>
--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150422/6c2c55ae/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150422/6c2c55ae/attachment.png>
View list directory