[EL] ELB News and Commentary 6/4/15

Rick Hasen rhasen at law.uci.edu
Mon Jun 8 07:23:57 PDT 2015


    “Billionaire Or Bust: Who Are Rich Backers Lining Up With?”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73271>

Posted onJune 8, 2015 7:19 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73271>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Peter Overby 
<http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/06/08/412763052/billionaire-or-bust-who-are-rich-backers-lining-up-with>on 
the plutocrat/sugar daddy phenomenon.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73271&title=%E2%80%9CBillionaire%20Or%20Bust%3A%20Who%20Are%20Rich%20Backers%20Lining%20Up%20With%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,Plutocrats United 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=104>


    “Counting Everyone for ‘One Person, One Vote'”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73269>

Posted onJune 8, 2015 7:15 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73269>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Jost on Justice. 
<http://jostonjustice.blogspot.com/2015/06/counting-everyone-for-one-person-one.html>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73269&title=%E2%80%9CCounting%20Everyone%20for%20%E2%80%98One%20Person%2C%20One%20Vote%27%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inredistricting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6>,Supreme Court 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    “Citizens United Shouldn’t Get All the Blame”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73267>

Posted onJune 8, 2015 7:14 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73267>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Wendy Kaminer Boston Globe column. 
<https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2015/06/07/citizens-united-shouldn-get-all-blame/0UHXEyijQY3CHfzKG7fsPI/story.html>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73267&title=%E2%80%9CCitizens%20United%20Shouldn%E2%80%99t%20Get%20All%20the%20Blame%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,Supreme 
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    “The super PAC minuet” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73265>

Posted onJune 8, 2015 7:12 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73265>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

George Will WaPo column. 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-super-pac-minuet/2015/06/05/9a5ec2ea-0b12-11e5-95fd-d580f1c5d44e_story.html>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73265&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20super%20PAC%20minuet%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,Supreme 
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    #SCOTUS Agrees to Hear Another Redistricting Case Next Term, This
    One with Lower (Or at Least More Obscure) Stakes
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73263>

Posted onJune 8, 2015 6:53 am 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73263>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

This morning, the Supreme Courtagreed 
<http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/060815zor_8m58.pdf>to 
hearShapiro v. Mack 
<http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/shapiro-v-mack/>, a 
redistricting case raising a procedural point: “Whether a single-judge 
district court may determine that a complaint covered by 28 U.S.C. § 
2284 is insubstantial, and that three judges therefore are not required, 
not because it concludes that the complaint is wholly frivolous, but 
because it concludes that the complaint fails to state a claim under 
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).”

Unlike the Court’s recent decision to hear theEvenwel 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?s=evenwel&x=0&y=0>one person, one vote 
case, which garnered considerable press coverage (my thoughts 
<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/05/evenwel_v_abbott_supreme_court_case_state_districts_count_voters_or_total.html>at 
Slate), this case is less high stakes and less controversial.  But it 
still has its own importance.  Here’s why.

Almost all cases come up to the Court on a cert. petition, and a 
decision not to hear a case up on cert. (the fate of the vast, vast 
majority of cert. petitions) has no precedential value. That is, you 
can’t read into a Court decision to deny a cert. petition anything about 
if the Supreme Court agrees with the lower court ruling it refused to hear.

But a small minority of cases, most importantly in the area of 
redistricting and campaign finance, come directly /on appeal/from a 
3-judge district court to the Supreme Court.  Unlike a cert. denial, the 
Court’s decision not to hear a case up on appeal means the lower court 
/did/get the result right (though not necessarily for the right 
reasons).  It seems pretty clear both from my look at older Supreme 
Court cases and from comments Justices have made at oral argument in 
3-judge court cases, that courts feel more pressure to give full 
hearings to cases up on appeal, because the Justices are worried about 
essentially signing off on lower court opinion results without a full 
hearing.  So litigants really want to get their cases heard before 
three-judge courts if they can, because it greatly increases the odds 
the Court will hear the case.  (That’s part of why Evenwel may have been 
heard—the Court had denied cert. on cases raising the same issue in the 
past, but Evenwel was an appeal, not a cert. petition.)  The 
/Shapiro/case concerns the question when a district court asked to put 
together a 3-judge court (this one to review Maryland redistricting) can 
decide the issue is insubstantial and does not deserve a three-judge court.

As I explainedhere <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=26377> on the 
importance of cases coming up on appeal,In my 2003 book,/The Supreme 
Court and Election Law/, 
<http://www.amazon.com/Supreme-Court-Election-Law-Equality/dp/0814736599>I 
discuss the fate of the famous case of/Harper v. Virginia State Board of 
Elections/ 
<http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=383&invol=663>, 
which started out as a summary affirmance/in favor/of the 
constitutionality of the poll tax, accompanied by a bitter dissent from 
Justice Goldberg.  Justice Black did not like what he saw in that 
dissent, and agreed to a full hearing. This delayed a decision a long 
time.  Long story short, he got burned as three Justices changed their 
minds when the Court heard the case, leading to an opinion striking down 
the poll tax and a dissent by Justice Black.  (My book reprints the 
draft Goldberg dissent in an appendix.)

For more background on the role of the three-judge court in election 
litigation, I highly recommend the work ofMichael Solimine 
<http://www.law.uc.edu/faculty-staff/faculty/michael-e-solimine>, 
includinghis most recent piece 
<http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/lawjournal/issues/volume68/number3/solimine.pdf>on 
the topic. Josh Douglas also has anexcellent piece 
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1679518>.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73263&title=%23SCOTUS%20Agrees%20to%20Hear%20Another%20Redistricting%20Case%20Next%20Term%2C%20This%20One%20with%20Lower%20%28Or%20at%20Least%20More%20Obscure%29%20Stakes&description=>
Posted inSupreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    Mike Carvin Says SCOTUS Appeal Likely in VA Redistricting Case
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73261>

Posted onJune 7, 2015 9:26 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73261>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WaPo. 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/federal-judges-bring-va-one-step-closer-to-a-new-congressional-map/2015/06/05/8a331de4-0bb7-11e5-9e39-0db921c47b93_story.html>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73261&title=Mike%20Carvin%20Says%20SCOTUS%20Appeal%20Likely%20in%20VA%20Redistricting%20Case&description=>
Posted inredistricting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6>,Supreme Court 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    Quote of the Day: Celebrity SCOTUS Edition
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73259>

Posted onJune 7, 2015 9:22 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73259>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

“Never compromise your principles,…unless of course your principles are 
Adolf Hitler’s, in which case you would be well advised to compromise 
them as much as you can.”

—Justice Antonin Scalia 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/justice-scalia-takes-on-commencement-cliches-in-humor-filled-speech/2015/06/04/a8c32f7e-0a27-11e5-a7ad-b430fc1d3f5c_story.html>, 
speaking at his granddaughter’s graduation.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73259&title=Quote%20of%20the%20Day%3A%20Celebrity%20SCOTUS%20Edition&description=>
Posted inCelebrity Justice <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=109>,Supreme 
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    “Same-sex Marriage and Plural Marriage”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73257>

Posted onJune 7, 2015 9:17 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73257>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Ron Den Otterblogs 
<http://balkin.blogspot.com/2015/06/same-sex-marriage-and-plural-marriage.html>at 
Balkinization on hisnew Cambridge book 
<http://www.amazon.com/Defense-Plural-Marriage-Ronald-Otter/dp/1107087716>. 
Very interesting!

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73257&title=%E2%80%9CSame-sex%20Marriage%20and%20Plural%20Marriage%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inSupreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    “Texas case could alter Statehouse district lines”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73255>

Posted onJune 7, 2015 9:13 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73255>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

CNHI reports. 
<http://www.jacksonvilleprogress.com/news/texas-case-could-alter-statehouse-district-lines/article_95061662-0bea-11e5-8dfb-abe84cd38792.html>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73255&title=%E2%80%9CTexas%20case%20could%20alter%20Statehouse%20district%20lines%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inredistricting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6>,Supreme Court 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    Remember That Rare Case of Impersonation Fraud Where a Woman Got Her
    Son to Vote for Her Husband? <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73253>

Posted onJune 7, 2015 9:12 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73253>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Back in 2012, I had a post ,Allegation of Actual Impersonation Voter 
Fraud Attempt in Texas…and An Illustration of Why Such Fraud is Rare and 
Stupid <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=33661>, with a follow-up, More on 
the Voter Impersonation Fraud Case in Fort Worth 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=33751> about a woman who took her son to 
vote for her husband while the husband was out of town, and then the 
husband returned unexectedly and voted. I wrote in the first post:

    Impersonation voter fraud is about the dumbest way I could think of
    to swing an election. That’s why almost all the cases of real fraud
    with the potential to affect elections involves absentee ballot
    fraud or election official misconduct: in both ways you could
    actually verify the fraudulent votes and cast them in sufficient
    enough numbers to affect elections. (More about the extreme rarity
    of impersonation voter fraudhere
    <http://www.amazon.com/Fraudulent-Fraud-Squad-Understanding-ebook/dp/B00795X5XI/ref=zg_bs_157417011_9>.)

    Note that the fraudulent scheme did not work—it was detected.
    Nonetheless, look for this allegation to become the new “1984 grand
    jury report <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19560>“–supposed evidence
    of a massive problem with impersonation voter fraud.

    I wrote in that second post:

    I wanted to get more information about the case, given how extremely
    rare voter impersonation fraud is.  The Tarrant County prosecutor’s
    office was kind enough to share a copy of theindictment
    <http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/Hazel-Woodard-Indictment.pdf>,
    It is pretty general, so I spoke by phone with the prosecutor in
    charge of the case, David Lobingier.

    Mr Lobingier told me that the allegation is that the mother took her
    minor son, a teenager, to the polling place to vote on election day.
    She took the father’s voting card.  The son showed the father’s card
    and signed in using his father’s name. (The son has the same name,
    but is a Jr., and he did not sign the junior.) He was then sent over
    to vote on the electronic voting machine. Later in the day, the
    father showed up to vote and poll workers said he had already voted,
    leading to the investigation and prosecution. The father did not
    know that the son had been sent to vote.

    I asked about the motivation for the mother’s alleged actions.  Mr.
    Lobingier said that the actions seemed “kind of stupid” and he could
    not recall any other case like it.  He said that his “surmise” was
    that the mother thought the father would be unable to vote that day,
    and so brought the son, but it was not clear why she was interested
    in having him vote in this election. (The mother is running as a
    Democratic precinct chair, but was not running in this election.)

    Mr. Lobingier said that he believes the defense is going to claim
    that the allegations are not true, and that the mother is claiming
    some kind of long-running dispute with someone at the precinct.

Well now, a guilty plea,  but witha twist 
<http://www.star-telegram.com/news/local/community/fort-worth/article23415846.html>:

    A Fort Worth woman who has been used as an example of why voter ID
    laws are needed pleaded guilty twice last week in a voter fraud case.

    On Tuesday, as Hazel Brionne Woodard lay partially unconscious in a
    Tarrant County courtroom, she muttered to paramedics that she
    confessed to a crime that she did not commit.

    Woodard, a 2011 Democratic precinct chair candidate, had admitted to
    having her son vote on behalf of his father on June 18, 2011. Voter
    fraud allegations arose after the boy’s father showed up to cast his
    own ballot later that same day.

    Woodward was sentenced to two years of deferred adjudication
    probation on her initial plea, but Judge Ruben Gonzales did not make
    it official because of her medical issues.

    Woodard was back in the courtroom Friday, when Gonzales gave her an
    opportunity to withdraw her guilty plea and have a jury trial,
    saying he had a “strong concern” that she did not admit to her crime.

    Woodard then readmitted her guilt and took the probation offer.

    “There is no doubt that after today that you admit to this crime,”
    Gonzales said Friday.

    Woodward’s plea was the latest twist in a case that has been used as
    an example of what’s wrong with the Texas voting system. When she
    was indicted in 2011 — under the name Hazel Woodward James
    —lawmakers argued that her behavior was why the Texas voter ID law
    was needed.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73253&title=Remember%20That%20Rare%20Case%20of%20Impersonation%20Fraud%20Where%20a%20Woman%20Got%20Her%20Son%20to%20Vote%20for%20Her%20Husband%3F&description=>
Posted inchicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>,election 
administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter id 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>


    “Dennis Hastert Rushed to Make Money as Payouts Grew”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73251>

Posted onJune 7, 2015 9:00 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73251>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Must-read NYT report 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/07/us/politics/dennis-hastert-rushed-to-make-money-as-payouts-grew.html?ref=politics>. 
  The Hastert case is about allegations of sexual abuse. But this Eric 
Lipton report shows how thedocuments getting leaked 
<http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/06/07/us/politics/document-from-public-servant-to-rainmaker-former-speaker-j-dennis-hastert.html>reveal 
a lot about lobbyists, former lawmakers, and the pay to play culture in DC.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73251&title=%E2%80%9CDennis%20Hastert%20Rushed%20to%20Make%20Money%20as%20Payouts%20Grew%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inchicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>,lobbying 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=28>


    “Not Everyone Hates Citizens United: The landmark campaign finance
    ruling made local TV stations very, very rich.”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73249>

Posted onJune 7, 2015 8:57 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73249>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Michael Socolow for Slate 
<http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2015/06/citizens_united_is_making_local_tv_rich_here_s_why.html>.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73249&title=%E2%80%9CNot%20Everyone%20Hates%20Citizens%20United%3A%20The%20landmark%20campaign%20finance%20ruling%20made%20local%20TV%20stations%20very%2C%20very%20rich.%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,campaigns 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>,Supreme Court 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    “What Took You So Long, Jeb Bush?” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73247>

Posted onJune 7, 2015 8:54 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73247>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Seth Meyers <http://www.hulu.com/watch/800858>on Jeb the Destroyer and 
campaign finance.

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73247&title=%E2%80%9CWhat%20Took%20You%20So%20Long%2C%20Jeb%20Bush%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,election 
law "humor" <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=52>,Supreme Court 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    EJ Dionne Column on Hillary Clinton and Voting Rights
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73245>

Posted onJune 7, 2015 8:53 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73245>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WaPo. 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/hillary-clinton-taps-the-political-power-of-you/2015/06/07/0329b954-0bdd-11e5-9e39-0db921c47b93_story.html>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73245&title=EJ%20Dionne%20Column%20on%20Hillary%20Clinton%20and%20Voting%20Rights&description=>
Posted inelection administration 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>


    “Shaun McCutcheon Blew Up Campaign-Finance Law and Became a GOP
    Hero. Then He Set His Sights on Paris Hilton. Inside the marvelous
    life of a first amendment celebrity.”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73243>

Posted onJune 7, 2015 8:51 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73243>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Great Washingtonian profile. 
<http://www.washingtonian.com/blogs/capitalcomment/personalities/sean-mccutcheon-blew-up-campaign-finance-law-and-became-a-gop-hero-then-he-set-his-sights-on-paris-h.php>

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73243&title=%E2%80%9CShaun%20McCutcheon%20Blew%20Up%20Campaign-Finance%20Law%20and%20Became%20a%20GOP%20Hero.%20Then%20He%20Set%20His%20Sights%20on%20Paris%20Hilton.%20Inside%20the%20marvelous%20life%20of%20a%20first%20amendment%20celebrity.%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,Supreme 
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>


    “Gov. Brownback to sign bills for secretary of state prosecutorial
    power, election changes” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73241>

Posted onJune 5, 2015 8:13 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73241>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Boo. 
<http://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article23210259.html> (Kobach)

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73241&title=%E2%80%9CGov.%20Brownback%20to%20sign%20bills%20for%20secretary%20of%20state%20prosecutorial%20power%2C%20election%20changes%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted infraudulent fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>


    “Republican Candidates Assail Hillary Clinton on Voting Rights”
    <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73239>

Posted onJune 5, 2015 12:46 pm 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73239>byRick Hasen 
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Taking the bait 
<http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/06/05/republican-candidates-assail-hillary-clinton-on-voting-rights/>?

Share 
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73239&title=%E2%80%9CRepublican%20Candidates%20Assail%20Hillary%20Clinton%20on%20Voting%20Rights%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inThe Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>

-- 
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150608/cf4c030e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150608/cf4c030e/attachment.png>


View list directory