[EL] ELB News and Commentary 6/8/15
Rick Hasen
rhasen at law.uci.edu
Mon Jun 8 07:26:08 PDT 2015
Sorry for the incorrect date in the heading
On 6/8/15 7:23 AM, Rick Hasen wrote:
>
>
> “Billionaire Or Bust: Who Are Rich Backers Lining Up With?”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73271>
>
> Posted onJune 8, 2015 7:19 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73271>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Peter Overby
> <http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/06/08/412763052/billionaire-or-bust-who-are-rich-backers-lining-up-with>on
> the plutocrat/sugar daddy phenomenon.
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73271&title=%E2%80%9CBillionaire%20Or%20Bust%3A%20Who%20Are%20Rich%20Backers%20Lining%20Up%20With%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted incampaign finance
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,Plutocrats United
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=104>
>
>
> “Counting Everyone for ‘One Person, One Vote'”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73269>
>
> Posted onJune 8, 2015 7:15 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73269>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Jost on Justice.
> <http://jostonjustice.blogspot.com/2015/06/counting-everyone-for-one-person-one.html>
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73269&title=%E2%80%9CCounting%20Everyone%20for%20%E2%80%98One%20Person%2C%20One%20Vote%27%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted inredistricting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6>,Supreme
> Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
>
>
> “Citizens United Shouldn’t Get All the Blame”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73267>
>
> Posted onJune 8, 2015 7:14 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73267>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Wendy Kaminer Boston Globe column.
> <https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2015/06/07/citizens-united-shouldn-get-all-blame/0UHXEyijQY3CHfzKG7fsPI/story.html>
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73267&title=%E2%80%9CCitizens%20United%20Shouldn%E2%80%99t%20Get%20All%20the%20Blame%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,Supreme
> Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
>
>
> “The super PAC minuet” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73265>
>
> Posted onJune 8, 2015 7:12 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73265>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> George Will WaPo column.
> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-super-pac-minuet/2015/06/05/9a5ec2ea-0b12-11e5-95fd-d580f1c5d44e_story.html>
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73265&title=%E2%80%9CThe%20super%20PAC%20minuet%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,Supreme
> Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
>
>
> #SCOTUS Agrees to Hear Another Redistricting Case Next Term, This
> One with Lower (Or at Least More Obscure) Stakes
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73263>
>
> Posted onJune 8, 2015 6:53 am
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73263>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> This morning, the Supreme Courtagreed
> <http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/060815zor_8m58.pdf>to
> hearShapiro v. Mack
> <http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/shapiro-v-mack/>, a
> redistricting case raising a procedural point: “Whether a single-judge
> district court may determine that a complaint covered by 28 U.S.C. §
> 2284 is insubstantial, and that three judges therefore are not
> required, not because it concludes that the complaint is wholly
> frivolous, but because it concludes that the complaint fails to state
> a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).”
>
> Unlike the Court’s recent decision to hear theEvenwel
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?s=evenwel&x=0&y=0>one person, one vote
> case, which garnered considerable press coverage (my thoughts
> <http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/05/evenwel_v_abbott_supreme_court_case_state_districts_count_voters_or_total.html>at
> Slate), this case is less high stakes and less controversial. But it
> still has its own importance. Here’s why.
>
> Almost all cases come up to the Court on a cert. petition, and a
> decision not to hear a case up on cert. (the fate of the vast, vast
> majority of cert. petitions) has no precedential value. That is, you
> can’t read into a Court decision to deny a cert. petition anything
> about if the Supreme Court agrees with the lower court ruling it
> refused to hear.
>
> But a small minority of cases, most importantly in the area of
> redistricting and campaign finance, come directly /on appeal/from a
> 3-judge district court to the Supreme Court. Unlike a cert. denial,
> the Court’s decision not to hear a case up on appeal means the lower
> court /did/get the result right (though not necessarily for the right
> reasons). It seems pretty clear both from my look at older Supreme
> Court cases and from comments Justices have made at oral argument in
> 3-judge court cases, that courts feel more pressure to give full
> hearings to cases up on appeal, because the Justices are worried about
> essentially signing off on lower court opinion results without a full
> hearing. So litigants really want to get their cases heard before
> three-judge courts if they can, because it greatly increases the odds
> the Court will hear the case. (That’s part of why Evenwel may have
> been heard—the Court had denied cert. on cases raising the same issue
> in the past, but Evenwel was an appeal, not a cert. petition.) The
> /Shapiro/case concerns the question when a district court asked to put
> together a 3-judge court (this one to review Maryland redistricting)
> can decide the issue is insubstantial and does not deserve a
> three-judge court.
>
> As I explainedhere <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=26377> on the
> importance of cases coming up on appeal,In my 2003 book,/The Supreme
> Court and Election Law/,
> <http://www.amazon.com/Supreme-Court-Election-Law-Equality/dp/0814736599>I
> discuss the fate of the famous case of/Harper v. Virginia State Board
> of Elections/
> <http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=383&invol=663>,
> which started out as a summary affirmance/in favor/of the
> constitutionality of the poll tax, accompanied by a bitter dissent
> from Justice Goldberg. Justice Black did not like what he saw in that
> dissent, and agreed to a full hearing. This delayed a decision a long
> time. Long story short, he got burned as three Justices changed their
> minds when the Court heard the case, leading to an opinion striking
> down the poll tax and a dissent by Justice Black. (My book reprints
> the draft Goldberg dissent in an appendix.)
>
> For more background on the role of the three-judge court in election
> litigation, I highly recommend the work ofMichael Solimine
> <http://www.law.uc.edu/faculty-staff/faculty/michael-e-solimine>,
> includinghis most recent piece
> <http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/lawjournal/issues/volume68/number3/solimine.pdf>on
> the topic. Josh Douglas also has anexcellent piece
> <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1679518>.
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73263&title=%23SCOTUS%20Agrees%20to%20Hear%20Another%20Redistricting%20Case%20Next%20Term%2C%20This%20One%20with%20Lower%20%28Or%20at%20Least%20More%20Obscure%29%20Stakes&description=>
> Posted inSupreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
>
>
> Mike Carvin Says SCOTUS Appeal Likely in VA Redistricting Case
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73261>
>
> Posted onJune 7, 2015 9:26 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73261>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> WaPo.
> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/federal-judges-bring-va-one-step-closer-to-a-new-congressional-map/2015/06/05/8a331de4-0bb7-11e5-9e39-0db921c47b93_story.html>
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73261&title=Mike%20Carvin%20Says%20SCOTUS%20Appeal%20Likely%20in%20VA%20Redistricting%20Case&description=>
> Posted inredistricting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6>,Supreme
> Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
>
>
> Quote of the Day: Celebrity SCOTUS Edition
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73259>
>
> Posted onJune 7, 2015 9:22 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73259>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> “Never compromise your principles,…unless of course your principles
> are Adolf Hitler’s, in which case you would be well advised to
> compromise them as much as you can.”
>
> —Justice Antonin Scalia
> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/justice-scalia-takes-on-commencement-cliches-in-humor-filled-speech/2015/06/04/a8c32f7e-0a27-11e5-a7ad-b430fc1d3f5c_story.html>,
> speaking at his granddaughter’s graduation.
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73259&title=Quote%20of%20the%20Day%3A%20Celebrity%20SCOTUS%20Edition&description=>
> Posted inCelebrity Justice
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=109>,Supreme Court
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
>
>
> “Same-sex Marriage and Plural Marriage”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73257>
>
> Posted onJune 7, 2015 9:17 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73257>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Ron Den Otterblogs
> <http://balkin.blogspot.com/2015/06/same-sex-marriage-and-plural-marriage.html>at
> Balkinization on hisnew Cambridge book
> <http://www.amazon.com/Defense-Plural-Marriage-Ronald-Otter/dp/1107087716>.
> Very interesting!
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73257&title=%E2%80%9CSame-sex%20Marriage%20and%20Plural%20Marriage%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted inSupreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
>
>
> “Texas case could alter Statehouse district lines”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73255>
>
> Posted onJune 7, 2015 9:13 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73255>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> CNHI reports.
> <http://www.jacksonvilleprogress.com/news/texas-case-could-alter-statehouse-district-lines/article_95061662-0bea-11e5-8dfb-abe84cd38792.html>
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73255&title=%E2%80%9CTexas%20case%20could%20alter%20Statehouse%20district%20lines%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted inredistricting <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=6>,Supreme
> Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
>
>
> Remember That Rare Case of Impersonation Fraud Where a Woman Got
> Her Son to Vote for Her Husband? <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73253>
>
> Posted onJune 7, 2015 9:12 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73253>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Back in 2012, I had a post ,Allegation of Actual Impersonation Voter
> Fraud Attempt in Texas…and An Illustration of Why Such Fraud is Rare
> and Stupid <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=33661>, with a follow-up,
> More on the Voter Impersonation Fraud Case in Fort Worth
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=33751> about a woman who took her son
> to vote for her husband while the husband was out of town, and then
> the husband returned unexectedly and voted. I wrote in the first post:
>
> Impersonation voter fraud is about the dumbest way I could think
> of to swing an election. That’s why almost all the cases of real
> fraud with the potential to affect elections involves absentee
> ballot fraud or election official misconduct: in both ways you
> could actually verify the fraudulent votes and cast them in
> sufficient enough numbers to affect elections. (More about the
> extreme rarity of impersonation voter fraudhere
> <http://www.amazon.com/Fraudulent-Fraud-Squad-Understanding-ebook/dp/B00795X5XI/ref=zg_bs_157417011_9>.)
>
> Note that the fraudulent scheme did not work—it was detected.
> Nonetheless, look for this allegation to become the new “1984
> grand jury report <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=19560>“–supposed
> evidence of a massive problem with impersonation voter fraud.
>
> I wrote in that second post:
>
> I wanted to get more information about the case, given how
> extremely rare voter impersonation fraud is. The Tarrant County
> prosecutor’s office was kind enough to share a copy of
> theindictment
> <http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/Hazel-Woodard-Indictment.pdf>,
> It is pretty general, so I spoke by phone with the prosecutor in
> charge of the case, David Lobingier.
>
> Mr Lobingier told me that the allegation is that the mother took
> her minor son, a teenager, to the polling place to vote on
> election day. She took the father’s voting card. The son showed
> the father’s card and signed in using his father’s name. (The son
> has the same name, but is a Jr., and he did not sign the junior.)
> He was then sent over to vote on the electronic voting machine.
> Later in the day, the father showed up to vote and poll workers
> said he had already voted, leading to the investigation and
> prosecution. The father did not know that the son had been sent to
> vote.
>
> I asked about the motivation for the mother’s alleged actions.
> Mr. Lobingier said that the actions seemed “kind of stupid” and he
> could not recall any other case like it. He said that his
> “surmise” was that the mother thought the father would be unable
> to vote that day, and so brought the son, but it was not clear why
> she was interested in having him vote in this election. (The
> mother is running as a Democratic precinct chair, but was not
> running in this election.)
>
> Mr. Lobingier said that he believes the defense is going to claim
> that the allegations are not true, and that the mother is claiming
> some kind of long-running dispute with someone at the precinct.
>
> Well now, a guilty plea, but witha twist
> <http://www.star-telegram.com/news/local/community/fort-worth/article23415846.html>:
>
> A Fort Worth woman who has been used as an example of why voter ID
> laws are needed pleaded guilty twice last week in a voter fraud case.
>
> On Tuesday, as Hazel Brionne Woodard lay partially unconscious in
> a Tarrant County courtroom, she muttered to paramedics that she
> confessed to a crime that she did not commit.
>
> Woodard, a 2011 Democratic precinct chair candidate, had admitted
> to having her son vote on behalf of his father on June 18, 2011.
> Voter fraud allegations arose after the boy’s father showed up to
> cast his own ballot later that same day.
>
> Woodward was sentenced to two years of deferred adjudication
> probation on her initial plea, but Judge Ruben Gonzales did not
> make it official because of her medical issues.
>
> Woodard was back in the courtroom Friday, when Gonzales gave her
> an opportunity to withdraw her guilty plea and have a jury trial,
> saying he had a “strong concern” that she did not admit to her crime.
>
> Woodard then readmitted her guilt and took the probation offer.
>
> “There is no doubt that after today that you admit to this crime,”
> Gonzales said Friday.
>
> Woodward’s plea was the latest twist in a case that has been used
> as an example of what’s wrong with the Texas voting system. When
> she was indicted in 2011 — under the name Hazel Woodward James
> —lawmakers argued that her behavior was why the Texas voter ID law
> was needed.
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73253&title=Remember%20That%20Rare%20Case%20of%20Impersonation%20Fraud%20Where%20a%20Woman%20Got%20Her%20Son%20to%20Vote%20for%20Her%20Husband%3F&description=>
> Posted inchicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>,election
> administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter id
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>
>
>
> “Dennis Hastert Rushed to Make Money as Payouts Grew”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73251>
>
> Posted onJune 7, 2015 9:00 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73251>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Must-read NYT report
> <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/07/us/politics/dennis-hastert-rushed-to-make-money-as-payouts-grew.html?ref=politics>.
> The Hastert case is about allegations of sexual abuse. But this Eric
> Lipton report shows how thedocuments getting leaked
> <http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/06/07/us/politics/document-from-public-servant-to-rainmaker-former-speaker-j-dennis-hastert.html>reveal
> a lot about lobbyists, former lawmakers, and the pay to play culture
> in DC.
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73251&title=%E2%80%9CDennis%20Hastert%20Rushed%20to%20Make%20Money%20as%20Payouts%20Grew%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted inchicanery <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>,lobbying
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=28>
>
>
> “Not Everyone Hates Citizens United: The landmark campaign finance
> ruling made local TV stations very, very rich.”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73249>
>
> Posted onJune 7, 2015 8:57 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73249>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Michael Socolow for Slate
> <http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2015/06/citizens_united_is_making_local_tv_rich_here_s_why.html>.
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73249&title=%E2%80%9CNot%20Everyone%20Hates%20Citizens%20United%3A%20The%20landmark%20campaign%20finance%20ruling%20made%20local%20TV%20stations%20very%2C%20very%20rich.%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted incampaign finance
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,campaigns
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>,Supreme Court
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
>
>
> “What Took You So Long, Jeb Bush?”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73247>
>
> Posted onJune 7, 2015 8:54 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73247>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Seth Meyers <http://www.hulu.com/watch/800858>on Jeb the Destroyer and
> campaign finance.
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73247&title=%E2%80%9CWhat%20Took%20You%20So%20Long%2C%20Jeb%20Bush%3F%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted incampaign finance
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,election law "humor"
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=52>,Supreme Court
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
>
>
> EJ Dionne Column on Hillary Clinton and Voting Rights
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73245>
>
> Posted onJune 7, 2015 8:53 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73245>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> WaPo.
> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/hillary-clinton-taps-the-political-power-of-you/2015/06/07/0329b954-0bdd-11e5-9e39-0db921c47b93_story.html>
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73245&title=EJ%20Dionne%20Column%20on%20Hillary%20Clinton%20and%20Voting%20Rights&description=>
> Posted inelection administration
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
> “Shaun McCutcheon Blew Up Campaign-Finance Law and Became a GOP
> Hero. Then He Set His Sights on Paris Hilton. Inside the marvelous
> life of a first amendment celebrity.”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73243>
>
> Posted onJune 7, 2015 8:51 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73243>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Great Washingtonian profile.
> <http://www.washingtonian.com/blogs/capitalcomment/personalities/sean-mccutcheon-blew-up-campaign-finance-law-and-became-a-gop-hero-then-he-set-his-sights-on-paris-h.php>
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73243&title=%E2%80%9CShaun%20McCutcheon%20Blew%20Up%20Campaign-Finance%20Law%20and%20Became%20a%20GOP%20Hero.%20Then%20He%20Set%20His%20Sights%20on%20Paris%20Hilton.%20Inside%20the%20marvelous%20life%20of%20a%20first%20amendment%20celebrity.%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,Supreme
> Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
>
>
> “Gov. Brownback to sign bills for secretary of state prosecutorial
> power, election changes” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73241>
>
> Posted onJune 5, 2015 8:13 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73241>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Boo.
> <http://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article23210259.html> (Kobach)
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73241&title=%E2%80%9CGov.%20Brownback%20to%20sign%20bills%20for%20secretary%20of%20state%20prosecutorial%20power%2C%20election%20changes%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted infraudulent fraud squad <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=8>
>
>
> “Republican Candidates Assail Hillary Clinton on Voting Rights”
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73239>
>
> Posted onJune 5, 2015 12:46 pm
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73239>byRick Hasen
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> Taking the bait
> <http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/06/05/republican-candidates-assail-hillary-clinton-on-voting-rights/>?
>
> Share
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73239&title=%E2%80%9CRepublican%20Candidates%20Assail%20Hillary%20Clinton%20on%20Voting%20Rights%E2%80%9D&description=>
> Posted inThe Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
> --
> Rick Hasen
> Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
> UC Irvine School of Law
> 401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
> Irvine, CA 92697-8000
> 949.824.3072 - office
> 949.824.0495 - fax
> rhasen at law.uci.edu
> http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
> http://electionlawblog.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150608/a28dba8a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150608/a28dba8a/attachment.png>
View list directory