[EL] ELB News and Commentary 6/9/15
Rick Hasen
rhasen at law.uci.edu
Tue Jun 9 08:52:38 PDT 2015
Pushback on My Hillary Voting Wars Piece
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73306>
Posted onJune 9, 2015 8:50 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73306>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
The good news is thatDoug Chapin
<http://about%20a%20quarter%20of%20americans%20also%20say%20they%27d%20like%20to%20see%20their%20state%20expand%20early%20voting%2C%20while%2037%20percent%20say%20their%20state%27s%20policies%20are%20about%20right.%20only%209%20percent%20want%20to%20see%20early%20voting%20reduced.%20%20more%20broadly%2C%20a%20majority%20of%20the%20public%20--%2061%20percent%20--%20say%20that%20low%20voter%20turnout%20is%20at%20least%20a%20moderate%20problem.%20many%2C%20though%2C%20aren%27t%20sure%20it%27s%20the%20government%27s%20problem%20to%20fix.%20forty-six%20percent%20of%20people%20say%20the%20government%20is%20already%20doing%20enough%20to%20make%20sure%20that%20everyone%20who%20wants%20to%20vote%20in%20elections%20is%20able%20to%2C%20while%2032%20percent%20say%20it%20isn%27t.%20democrats%20say%20by%20a%2024-point%20margin%20that%20the%20government%20doesn%27t%20do%20enough%2C%20while%20republicans%20say%20by%20a%2055-point%20margin%20that%20it%20does./>liked
mySlate piece
<http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/electionacademy/2015/06/putting_out_a_fire_with_gasoli.php>from
yesterday on whether Hillary Clinton is making real election reform
harder by framing the issue as a partisan fight. The bad news is that
Doug seems to be alone in telling me to “Rock on.” Most thoughtful
people I know with whom I share my writing have had a much more negative
reaction to the piece, even if it appears that Clinton’s framing of the
issue may decreaseRepublican support for reform
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73304>.
I would say the responses fit into three categories:
1. There are no moderate Republicans who will deal on election reform.
Republicans won’t support fixing the Voting Rights Act or anything else
so there’s very little to lose (and, as I agree in the Slate piece,
Clinton is advancing good policies and it is good base politics for her
to give this red meat to her supporters). The examples I give in the
eighth paragraph of my piece, where Republicans and Democrats have come
together on issues, is simply too little, or the policies they’ve come
together on, too insignificant.
2. The few moderate Republicans out there are more likely to respond by
being shamed into doing the right thing than through rational
discussion. (I’m not sure how to judge what is more effective, but I
thought the Bauer-Ginsberg commission was a good example of how things
could get done with the rhetoric lower.)
3. The comments of Scott Walker, Rick Perry etc. about the extent of
voter fraud and the policies they have adopted are so outrageous that
they deserve to be called out for their bad behavior. (On this point, I
agree, but I don’t think the Clinton, who has about an even chance to be
the next President, is the one to do it. I try to do it all the time on
the blog when the issue arises, and many, many people write about this.)
I usually don’t have doubts about the positions I put forward in my
opeds and commentaries, but this pushback has been so strong from many
people I respect that I will think on this some more.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73306&title=Pushback%20on%20My%20Hillary%20Voting%20Wars%20Piece&description=>
Posted inelection administration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
“Republican Support For Automatic Voter Registration Is Way Lower
Than It Used To Be” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73304>
Posted onJune 9, 2015 8:39 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73304>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Ariel Edwards-Levy
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/08/automatic-voter-registration_n_7537608.html>for
HuffPo:
Back in March, 53 percent of Republicans supported their state
introducing a law like Oregon’s. Today, just 38 percent are in favor
of automatically registering citizens who are eligible to vote.
The two polls aren’t exactly identical. The earlier survey asked
about a state-level proposal rather than a national one. It also
introduced a further qualifier on how citizens would be registered —
that is, through the DMV, rather than universally.
But there’s an even more direct way of measuring the degree to which
support for the idea has eroded among Republican voters. While half
of those polled were asked simply whether they favored or opposed
automatic registration, the rest were first told that the idea had
been recently proposed by Clinton. Among that group, GOP support
dropped an additional 10 points to just 28 percent…
About a quarter of Americans also say they’d like to see their state
expand early voting, while 37 percent say their state’s policies are
about right. Only 9 percent want to see early voting reduced.
More broadly, a majority of the public — 61 percent — say that low
voter turnout is at least a moderate problem. Many, though, aren’t
sure it’s the government’s problem to fix. Forty-six percent of
people say the government is already doing enough to make sure that
everyone who wants to vote in elections is able to, while 32 percent
say it isn’t. Democrats say by a 24-point margin that the government
doesn’t do enough, while Republicans say by a 55-point margin that
it does.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73304&title=%E2%80%9CRepublican%20Support%20For%20Automatic%20Voter%20Registration%20Is%20Way%20Lower%20Than%20It%20Used%20To%20Be%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inelection administration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
WI Has Inadequate Funding for Voter ID Education Campaign
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73302>
Posted onJune 9, 2015 8:28 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73302>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
In an earlier post, WI GAB Has Only Tiny Budget to Get Out Word About
New Voter ID Requirements
<http://wi%20gab%20has%20only%20tiny%20budget%20to%20get%20out%20word%20about%20new%20voter%20id%20requirements/>.
The GAB spokesperson responded with apretty cheerful message
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72694>about the adequacy of funding, but
the picture seemsless bright:
<http://thinkprogress.org/election/2015/06/08/3667026/wisconsin-voters-feel-screwed-new-voting-restrictions/>
Governor Scott Walker’s budget, which must pass in the next few
weeks, includesalmost no funding
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=72671>for the GAB to educate voters
about the new requirements. The agency had estimated it would cost
about $500,000 to inform the state’s millions of voters about the
law, but they were given a only tiny fraction of that amount.
“We actually made a great ad campaign. We havecatchy videos in
English and Spanish <http://bringit.wisconsin.gov/downloads>. But we
weren’t given any money to air them,” Wolfe told ThinkProgress. “Our
request for additional funding was denied.”
Due to the lack of funds, Wolfe said she could only give workshops
if communities self-organize and request one, as they did in
Milwaukee. She also implored the attendees to widely share the PSAs
they can’t afford to get on the radio or TV.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73302&title=WI%20Has%20Inadequate%20Funding%20for%20Voter%20ID%20Education%20Campaign&description=>
Posted inelection administration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>,voter id
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=9>
Fiorina Against Automatic Voter Registration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73300>
Posted onJune 9, 2015 8:24 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73300>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Ben
Jacobs<http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/09/carly-fiorina-foreign-policy-republican-interview>in
The Guardian:
She was certainly hostile to Clinton’s most recent policy proposal,
which called for automatic voter registration of every eligible
American. “I don’t think it’s a good idea unless there are some
safeguards on who is registering,” said Fiorina. The former tech
company CEO added: “We know, for example, in a state like New
Hampshire, people drive across the border from Massachusetts,
register the same day and vote and then drive back home to
Massachusetts. We know that goes on.” (One Massachusetts residentwas
prosecuted
<http://www.rawstory.com/2014/06/voter-fraud-massachusetts-democrat-pleads-guilty-to-voting-in-new-hampshire-primary/>in
2014 for voting in two New Hampshire Democratic presidential
primaries. A state prosecutor at the time told Reuters he was
unaware of any other similar case of voter fraud in the Granite State.)
Fiorina then went on to harangue Clinton for accusing the GOP of
“trying to disenfranchise poor people and minorities”. She argued:
“If it’s such a commonsense proposal why was it accompanied by such
vitriol?”
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73300&title=Fiorina%20Against%20Automatic%20Voter%20Registration&description=>
Posted inelection administration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
“DOJ Wants 4 Years in Jail for Consultant In Super PAC Campaign
Coordination Case” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73297>
Posted onJune 9, 2015 8:22 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73297>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Bloomberg BNA:
<http://news.bna.com/mpdm/MPDMWB/split_display.adp?fedfid=70096430&vname=mpebulallissues&jd=a0g7z5w1m5&split=0>
The Justice Department is asking for a jail sentence of nearly four
years for Tyler Harber, a Virginia political consultant who pleaded
guilty to illegal coordination of campaign financing by a super
political action committee and a congressional candidate’s campaign
committee (U.S. v. Harber, E.D. Va., Criminal No. 14-373,sentencing
memo, 6/5/15).
Top DOJ officials said in asentencing memorandum
<http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/USA_v_Harber_Docket_No_114cr00373_ED_Va_Nov_06_2014_Court_Docket/2>that
a tough sentence for Harber would send a message that coordination
between candidate campaigns and supposedly independent super PACs
will not be tolerated.
The memorandum, filed June 5 in federal district court in
Alexandria, Va., said Harber should be sentenced to 46 months in
prison. DOJ said such a sentence would be at the “low end” of the
range of appropriate punishments imposed under federal sentencing
guidelines.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73297&title=%E2%80%9CDOJ%20Wants%204%20Years%20in%20Jail%20for%20Consultant%20In%20Super%20PAC%20Campaign%20Coordination%20Case%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,chicanery
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>,Department of Justice
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=26>
“‘Desperate’ at the FEC” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73295>
Posted onJune 9, 2015 8:17 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73295>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
I’ve got to agree
withBauer<http://www.moresoftmoneyhardlaw.com/2015/06/desperate-fec/>on
this point:
One explanation provided to/USA Today/is that it will allow for a
hearing at which the general public will be heard. Butsuch a hearing
<http://www.npr.org/2015/02/10/385267286/fec-invites-comment-on-campaign-finance-laws-at-first-public-hearing>has
been held, and the Chair could have unilaterally arranged for
another, as she did recently in convening aforum on the role of
women in politics
<http://www.fec.gov/pages/forums/WomenInPoliticsForum.shtml>.
The answer to this may be no more than: it does not matter, because
the Petition serves only to make a point. A sympathetic observer
would call it a/cri de coeur/; one less sympathetic might see it as
a PR maneuver. What might unite the two sides is merely their
agreement, for entirely different reasons, that the Commission is
not in good working order. The risk of the petition initiative is
that rather than move the discussion to a better place (hard as that
is), it sends a dreary message about the state of the agency.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73295&title=%E2%80%9C%E2%80%98Desperate%E2%80%99%20at%20the%20FEC%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,federal
election commission <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24>
“Editorial: Fraudulent claims of voter fraud”
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73293>
Posted onJune 9, 2015 8:09 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73293>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Anniston Star:
<http://www.annistonstar.com/opinion/editorial-fraudulent-claims-of-voter-fraud/article_01a087ec-0e2c-11e5-b0bc-bfbe9e6baca8.html> “States
should focus on getting more Americans to the polls, not chasing
phantoms of voter fraud.”
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73293&title=%E2%80%9CEditorial%3A%20Fraudulent%20claims%20of%20voter%20fraud%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inelection administration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
Paul Sherman NYT Letter to the Editor on Citizens United Poll
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73291>
Posted onJune 9, 2015 8:07 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73291>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Here.
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/09/opinion/misconceptions-about-the-citizens-united-ruling.html?_r=1>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73291&title=Paul%20Sherman%20NYT%20Letter%20to%20the%20Editor%20on%20Citizens%20United%20Poll&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,Supreme
Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
David Keating Responds to SacBee Editorial on Disclosing CCP Donor
List <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73289>
Posted onJune 9, 2015 8:05 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73289>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Keating
<http://www.sacbee.com/opinion/california-forum/article23130438.html>:
By claiming the right to the donor lists of all 501(c)(3)
organizations that seek public support from Californians, Attorney
General Kamala Harris can build a government database of donors to
nearly every charity and nonpolitical nonprofit in the country; from
the Salvation Army to the Heritage Foundation and the Sierra Club
Foundation, without explaining how this will help her regulate
charitable solicitation. Such a wide sweeping demand, unauthorized
by California law, infringes on our First Amendment rights.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73289&title=David%20Keating%20Responds%20to%20SacBee%20Editorial%20on%20Disclosing%20CCP%20Donor%20List&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>
“State Employees Are Having A Hard Time Explaining Scott Walker’s
New Voting Restrictions” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73287>
Posted onJune 8, 2015 6:52 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73287>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Think Progress reports.
<http://thinkprogress.org/election/2015/06/08/3667026/wisconsin-voters-feel-screwed-new-voting-restrictions/>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73287&title=%E2%80%9CState%20Employees%20Are%20Having%20A%20Hard%20Time%20Explaining%20Scott%20Walker%E2%80%99s%20New%20Voting%20Restrictions%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inUncategorized <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>
“Is Hillary Clinton Dooming Real Election Reform? If the Democratic
front-runner cares so much about voting rights, then she shouldn’t
be politicizing them.” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73283>
Posted onJune 8, 2015 1:16 pm
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73283>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
I have writtenthis new piece
<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/06/hillary_clinton_is_politicizing_voting_rights_the_democratic_frontrunner.html?wpsrc=sh_all_dt_tw_top>for
/Slate/. It begins:
Hillary Clintonspoke at Texas Southern University
<https://www.hillaryclinton.com/feed/hillary-clinton-we-should-make-it-easier-vote/>last
week, where she put forward somegood and provocative ideas
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/06/04/hillary-leans-hard-into-the-battle-over-voting/>for
improving our elections. She wants Congress to fix the part of the
Voting Rights Act that the Supreme Courtgutted
<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/26/opinion/the-chief-justices-long-game.html>in2013
<http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/Shelby_Cnty_v_Holder_No_1296_2013_BL_167707_US_June_25_2013_Court>.
She wants to expand early voting periods nationally to at least 20
days. And most provocatively, she advocates automatic universal
voter registration across the country, including a program to
automatically register high school students to vote before their
18^th birthdays.
But the partisan way she’s framed the issue—by blaming Republicans
for all the voting problems—makes it less likely these changes will
actually be implemented should she be elected president. Instead,
she’s offering red meat to her supporters while alienating the
allies she would need to get any reforms enacted.
Another snippet:
*/Slate/*readers may welcome Clinton calling out Republicans who are
acting in bad faith. I understand that impulse, because I agree that
Walker and Perry support restrictive voter ID laws not because they
believe voter fraud is a real problem but to help get Republicans
elected through suppressing the Democratic vote.
However, there are moderate Republicans who are willing to work with
Democrats on election reform when the issue is less politicized.
Consider the work of thePresidential Commission on Election
Administration <http://www.supportthevoter.gov/>, headed by
President Obama’s former head lawyer Robert Bauer and former Mitt
Romney campaign head lawyer Benjamin Ginsberg. They proposed
common-sense election reforms to improve our election processes—work
that is being carried forward on a bipartisan basis by groups like
theBipartisan Policy Center
<http://bipartisanpolicy.org/topics/governance/?key=electoral-reform>and
thePew Charitable Trust’s election reform project
<http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/projects/election-initiatives>. Doug
Chapin’sElection Academy
<http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/electionacademy/>brings
professionalism, not partisanship, to the field. And with a newly
functioning Election Assistance Commission, moderate technocratic
steps to improve our elections are possible.
Or consider how Republicans and Democrats have come together in many
places to support online voter registration, a great move to aid the
convenience of voters who are new or who have moved since last
voting. The Florida legislature passed this reform with great
bipartisan majorities, and Gov. Rick Scott reluctantlysigned the law
<http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundup/gov-rick-scott-with-some-hesitation-signs-online-voter-registration-law/2229827>,
even after his handpicked Secretary of State Ken Detzner fought
against its passage. The Republican Ohio Secretary of State, Jon
Husted,is pushing hard
<http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2015/05/10/capitol-insider-jon-husted-rallies-support-for-online-voter-signups.html>for
online voter registration, despite opposition from Republicans state
legislators.
It concludes:
On TwitterI complained
<https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/606579288670769153>that a
campaign is the last place to have a rational conversation about our
dysfunctional election system. Clinton’s lawyerElias responded
<https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/606630230028099584>:
“Wrong—it’s the best place to expose voter suppression for what it
is. Worst place is in academic papers no one reads.”
That may be a great position to take in the campaign. But it’s not
the kind of talk that is going to get Republicans in Congress to go
along with a Voting Rights Act fix proposed by a President Hillary
Clinton or any other meaningful reforms that will require bipartisan
support. Clinton would do the country a service by leaving election
reform to sober policy discussions and not campaign rallies.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73283&title=%E2%80%9CIs%20Hillary%20Clinton%20Dooming%20Real%20Election%20Reform%3F%20If%20the%20Democratic%20front-runner%20cares%20so%20much%20about%20voting%20rights%2C%20then%20she%20shouldn%E2%80%99t%20be%20politicizing%20them.%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted inelection administration
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>,The Voting Wars
<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
Read the Ravel-Weintraub Petition for the FEC to Engage in New
Rulemaking <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73279>
Posted onJune 8, 2015 9:33 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73279>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Here.
<http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/weintraub-ravel-petition.pdf>
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73279&title=Read%20the%20Ravel-Weintraub%20Petition%20for%20the%20FEC%20to%20Engage%20in%20New%20Rulemaking&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,federal
election commission <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24>
Joan Biskupic Takes Deep Dive into Ed Blum’s Latest Litigation:
Against Harvard’s Admissions Policy
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73277>
Posted onJune 8, 2015 9:29 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73277>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Read this from Reuters
<http://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-harvard-discrimination/>:
In recent months, Harvard University has come under attack in court
for allegedly limiting the number of Asian-American students it
admits. A Reuters examination reveals how the lawsuit brought in
their name arose from a broader goal: upending a nearly 40-year-old
Supreme Court decision that has primarily helped blacks and Hispanics.
A civil rights group representing African American and other
minority students has recently filed papers seeking to enter the
case, arguing they are the “real targets.” They say that if the
lawsuit succeeds, the consequences for blacks, Hispanics and Native
Americans would be “catastrophic,” and they cannot rely on Harvard
to represent their interests.
The lawsuit was not initiated by Asian Americans. It names none in
its 120 pages.
Rather, it was started by a conservative advocate, Edward Blum, who
over the years has enlisted white plaintiffs to challenge race-based
policies. He developed the case that two years ago led to a Supreme
Court decision narrowing the Voting Rights Act of
1965.http://reut.rs/1EYqyT4 Last week the justices accepted another
voting-related case he started, one that could shift voting power
from urban, Hispanic districts to rural, whiter areas in Texas.
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73277&title=Joan%20Biskupic%20Takes%20Deep%20Dive%20into%20Ed%20Blum%E2%80%99s%20Latest%20Litigation%3A%20Against%20Harvard%E2%80%99s%20Admissions%20Policy&description=>
Posted inSupreme Court <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=29>
“Exclusive: Two FEC officials implore agency to curb 2016 election
abuse” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73275>
Posted onJune 8, 2015 8:18 am
<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73275>byRick Hasen
<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Fredreka Schouten
<http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2015/06/08/fec-commissioners-ravel-and-weintraub-petition-campaign-finance/28674981/>for
USA Today reports that FEC Commissioners Ravel and Weintraub “are filing
a formal petition, urging their own agency to write rules to clamp down
on unfettered political spending and unmask the anonymous money flooding
U.S. elections.”
Share
<https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73275&title=%E2%80%9CExclusive%3A%20Two%20FEC%20officials%20implore%20agency%20to%20curb%202016%20election%20abuse%E2%80%9D&description=>
Posted incampaign finance <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>,federal
election commission <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=24>
--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
949.824.0495 - fax
rhasen at law.uci.edu
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150609/9219791c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150609/9219791c/attachment.png>
View list directory