[EL] ELB News and Commentary 6/9/15

[Paul Gronke]

Is Rick Hasen looking for some love?  We love ya, Rick!  :-)

You know that I wrote a piece following a similar piece regarding the
automatic voter registration bill passed by the Oregon legislature and
signed by Governor Kate Brown.  I remained agnostic in the piece about AVR,
but regretted that the bill passed without a single Republican vote.  (
http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2015/03/with_motor_voter_bill_oregon_p.html
)

I have received negative feedback similar to yours, Rick.  I try to explain
that setting the rules of the game via purely partisan votes can be
problematic, often using the tired but apt analogy of one soccer team
choosing a referee before a match.

The responses I receive are more of (1) and (3), by the way.

Some academic friends hoisting me on my own petard, recommending Alex
Keyssar's book to me (which I have usually recommended to them first!).
After all, since Keyssar's primary argument is that the right to vote
throughout American history has waxed and waned in response to partisan
competition, why should we expect anything different today?

What do you think about that argument (Mark Elias made a similar argument
on a Twitter exchange)?

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu> wrote:

>     Pushback on My Hillary Voting Wars Piece
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73306>
> Posted on June 9, 2015 8:50 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73306> by Rick
> Hasen <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> The good news is that Doug Chapin
> <http://about%20a%20quarter%20of%20americans%20also%20say%20they%27d%20like%20to%20see%20their%20state%20expand%20early%20voting%2C%20while%2037%20percent%20say%20their%20state%27s%20policies%20are%20about%20right.%20only%209%20percent%20want%20to%20see%20early%20voting%20reduced.%20%20more%20broadly%2C%20a%20majority%20of%20the%20public%20--%2061%20percent%20--%20say%20that%20low%20voter%20turnout%20is%20at%20least%20a%20moderate%20problem.%20many%2C%20though%2C%20aren%27t%20sure%20it%27s%20the%20government%27s%20problem%20to%20fix.%20forty-six%20percent%20of%20people%20say%20the%20government%20is%20already%20doing%20enough%20to%20make%20sure%20that%20everyone%20who%20wants%20to%20vote%20in%20elections%20is%20able%20to%2C%20while%2032%20percent%20say%20it%20isn%27t.%20democrats%20say%20by%20a%2024-point%20margin%20that%20the%20government%20doesn%27t%20do%20enough%2C%20while%20republicans%20say%20by%20a%2055-point%20margin%20that%20it%20does./>
>  liked my Slate piece
> <http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/electionacademy/2015/06/putting_out_a_fire_with_gasoli.php>
>  from yesterday on whether Hillary Clinton is making real election reform
> harder by framing the issue as a partisan fight. The bad news is that Doug
> seems to be alone in telling me to “Rock on.”  Most thoughtful people I
> know with whom I share my writing have had a much more negative reaction to
> the piece, even if it appears that Clinton’s framing of the issue may
> decrease Republican support for reform
> <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73304>.
>
> I would say the responses fit into three categories:
>
> 1. There are no moderate Republicans who will deal on election reform.
> Republicans won’t support fixing the Voting Rights Act or anything else so
> there’s very little to lose (and, as I agree in the Slate piece, Clinton is
> advancing good policies and it is good base politics for her to give this
> red meat to her supporters). The examples I give in the eighth paragraph of
> my piece, where Republicans and Democrats have come together on issues, is
> simply too little, or the policies they’ve come together on, too
> insignificant.
>
> 2. The few moderate Republicans out there are more likely to respond by
> being shamed into doing the right thing than through rational discussion.
> (I’m not sure how to judge what is more effective, but I thought the
> Bauer-Ginsberg commission was a good example of how things could get done
> with the rhetoric lower.)
>
> 3. The comments of Scott Walker, Rick Perry etc. about the extent of voter
> fraud and the policies they have adopted are so outrageous that they
> deserve to be called out for their bad behavior.  (On this point, I agree,
> but I don’t think the Clinton, who has about an even chance to be the next
> President, is the one to do it.  I try to do it all the time on the blog
> when the issue arises, and many, many people write about this.)
>
> I usually don’t have doubts about the positions I put forward in my opeds
> and commentaries, but this pushback has been so strong from many people I
> respect that I will think on this some more.
>  [image: Share]
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D73306&title=Pushback%20on%20My%20Hillary%20Voting%20Wars%20Piece&description=>
>
> ---
Paul Gronke    Ph: 503-771-3142
paul.gronke at gmail.com
Professor of Political Science and
Director, Early Voting Information Center
Reed College

http://earlyvoting.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150609/e44dd0f5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: share_save_171_16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20150609/e44dd0f5/attachment.png>