[EL] Democrats get 10, 498, 786 More Votes for US Senate than Republicans

[Lillie Coney]

There is the total vote and electoral college vote. Removing states from the total vote is as bad an idea as not counting votes cast in Detroit precincts.  The idea that you can undo a reality by distorting reality is interesting, but I would caution that votes are not the only contribution that California makes to this nation. Their Federal taxpayer contributions should they not be included in the total taxpayer dollars collected annually nation would be have a serious fiscal problem.



Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 23, 2016, at 9:45 AM, Joseph E. La Rue <joseph.e.larue at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thank you, John, and sorry: I hadn't seen your email when I wrote mine.  
> 
> 
> Joseph
> ___________________
> Joseph E. La Rue, Esq.*
> cell: 480.737.1321 
> email: joseph.e.larue at gmail.com
> 
> * Licensed in Arizona and Ohio
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information or otherwise be protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the message.
>  
> PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION/ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Any tax advice contained in this communication was not written and is not intended to be used for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending any transaction or matter addressed herein.
> 
> 
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Joseph E. La Rue <joseph.e.larue at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've got to believe that California's top-two system skewed these results.  I don't have the time to look into it properly at the moment.  Has anyone factored in what the results would be if we adjusted for that?  I bet it would be much closer to the national popular vote differential.  
>> 
>> 
>> Joseph
>> ___________________
>> Joseph E. La Rue, Esq.*
>> cell: 480.737.1321 
>> email: joseph.e.larue at gmail.com
>> 
>> * Licensed in Arizona and Ohio
>> 
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information or otherwise be protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the message.
>>  
>> PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION/ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT.
>> IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Any tax advice contained in this communication was not written and is not intended to be used for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending any transaction or matter addressed herein.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Smith, Brad <BSmith at law.capital.edu> wrote:
>>> Unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On Dec 23, 2016, at 1:02 AM, Richard Winger <richardwinger at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Yet of the 34 seats, Republicans won 22 and Democrats won 12.
>>>> 
>>>> http://ballot-access.org/2016/12/22/democrats-outpoll-republicans-in-u-s-senate-races-by-10498786-votes-but-republicans-win-22-of-the-34-seats/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Democrats Outpoll Republicans in U.S. Senate Races by 10,498,786 Votes, but...
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> Richard Winger 415-922-9779 PO Box 470296, San Francisco Ca 94147
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Law-election mailing list
>>>> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
>>>> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election&c=E,1,wG9KU53HkIBQ84tSHpl5PTKZurPon1gYqzR9WvSD7JyPhz5u-BVZx3X7KR1Y5S7L_Py0CMRq811oIzGjMcOKDU07xeT_-jk0R1NlGa1vnvYUN1yU&typo=1
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Law-election mailing list
>>> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
>>> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161224/66abae49/attachment.html>