[EL] Green party call for recounts
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
joehall at gmail.com
Sat Nov 26 08:32:50 PST 2016
That's not what Halderman suggested; I believe a good paraphrase would be
that he suggested that there had been a lot of other hacking in this
election aimed at influencing voter sentiment and that close margins for a
winner in these circumstances deserve close scrutiny.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 01:46 Mark Scarberry <mark.scarberry at pepperdine.edu>
wrote:
> Jill Stein and her Green party seem to be raising money to fund recounts
> in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania because of the suggestion that
> voting machines were hacked. See
> http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/jill-stein-recount-three-states-election-hacks-231814
> .
>
> Is a candidate who loses by a very large margin (based on the initial
> count) ordinarily entitled to a recount if the candidate is willing to pay
> for it? Does the candidate need to claim that a recount might result in the
> candidate winning, or at least that the candidate is seeking the recount in
> an attempt to win? Does any voter ordinarily have the right to demand a
> recount, if the voter is willing to pay for it?
>
> Does anyone think Halderman's suggestion that the machines were hacked so
> as to swing the election has any merit?
>
> Mark Scarberry
> Pepperdine University School of Law
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161126/de51ae06/attachment.html>
View list directory