[EL] If elections can be rigged...

[Hess, Doug]

Not to address the current case, but in some past videos from James O'K it is not always clear from the audio and video quality who people are responding to. In one of the ACORN videos it seems the ACORN employee is (at times) addressing the woman with O'Keefe and not replying to his questions and statements. 

Doug Hess

Message: 8
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:39:41 -0700
From: "Joseph E. La Rue" <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__joseph.e.larue-40gmail.com&d=DQICAg&c=HUrdOLg_tCr0UMeDjWLBOM9lLDRpsndbROGxEKQRFzk&r=xr_OjwGHtP-zw6I-DJj_MQ4cusLbiVT1bScGa0c8ZJo&m=qAJq-AxLw_JZhQr95eWo8CvgT8O8AMaeHTCL_Vr6T6I&s=xMPr-tP-LTA6WMsp_n0iQNT-739ghJPWZZdCMx3r3V4&e= >
To: John Farrell <jfarrell at mccandlishlawyers.com>
Cc: "law-election at uci.edu" <law-election at uci.edu>
Subject: Re: [EL] If elections can be rigged...
Message-ID:
	<CALKm0w9hndrbkq0o5oR=NgyUSXR=BrYKNRM11aJC=dfe=00gpQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Correct me if I am wrong, but I think Veritas has been accused of
"selective editing," which means that it has left out things that were
said, spliced tape together, etc.  I don't think, however, that it has ever
been shown to have spliced tape together so someone was shown saying
sentences he/she didn't actually say.  Thus, when those on the Left dismiss
this as "we can't know that the official actually said what we see him
saying," it rings hollow with many of us on the Right.  The point is, the
comments were made.  Perhaps the men said more than was shown.  But they *at
least* said what was shown.  And those remarks should be roundly condemned,
not excused because one doesn't like the filmer.


Joseph
___________________
*Joseph E. La Rue, Esq.**
cell: 480.737.1321
email: joseph.e.larue at gmail.com