[EL] Facts about the 2000 recount

[Douglas Johnson]

Just a reminder, since the 2000 recount’s being so often cited by both sides, about the follow up study that analyze what the 2000 election results would have been:

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/12/us/examining-vote-overview-study-disputed-florida-ballots-finds-justices-did-not.html

 

And it includes the great 2000 election irony: the 4-county recount Gore requested, if granted, would have concluded with Bush still victorious. 

 

-          Doug

 

Douglas Johnson, Ph.D.

Fellow, Rose Institute of State and Local Government

at Claremont McKenna College

douglas.johnson at cmc.edu

direct: 310-200-2058

 

“6 Facts About Bush v. Gore Worth Remembering Before The Trump Campaign Revises History To Death” <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87842> 

Posted on October 20, 2016 4:35 pm <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87842>  by  <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3> Rick Hasen

Elie Mystal <http://abovethelaw.com/2016/10/6-facts-about-bush-v-gore-worth-remembering-before-the-trump-campaign-revises-history-to-death/>  for ATL.

 <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87842&title=%E2%80%9C6%20Facts%20About%20Bush%20v.%20Gore%20Worth%20Remembering%20Before%20The%20Trump%20Campaign%20Revises%20History%20To%20Death%E2%80%9D> 

Posted in Bush v. Gore reflections <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=5> 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161021/6798ec44/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 10884 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161021/6798ec44/attachment.png>