[EL] Rick's disagreement with my statement about Trump

Sun Oct 23 04:39:03 PDT 2016

I see that and thank you. Sorry to unnecessarily bother people with  this.  
I will also let my colleagues know this too who did not receive  it.  Jim

In a message dated 10/22/2016 9:33:47 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
rhasen at law.uci.edu writes:

If I'm counting right people on the list will now have seen this five  
times. There must be an issue on your end. 

Rick Hasen
Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse  typos.

_____________________________
From: _jboppjr at aol.com_ (mailto:jboppjr at aol.com) 
Sent: Saturday,  October 22, 2016 6:29 AM
Subject: Re: Rick's disagreement with my statement  about Trump
To: Rick Hasen <_rhasen at law.uci.edu_ (mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu) >, 
<_law-election at uci.edu_ (mailto:law-election at uci.edu) >
Cc: <_lowenstein at law.ucla.edu_ (mailto:lowenstein at law.ucla.edu) >

This post was not emailed out.  I am asking that that be done.   Jim

In a message dated 10/22/2016 8:59:56 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
_rhasen at law.uci.edu_ (mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu)  writes:

We have had some problems in the past with aol users receiving  messages. 
One can always check archives to see if a message was sent out.  

Rick Hasen
Sent from my iPhone. Please  excuse typos.

On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 5:17 AM -0700, "_JBoppjr at aol.com_ 
(mailto:JBoppjr at aol.com) " <_JBoppjr at aol.com_ (mailto:JBoppjr at aol.com) >  wrote:

Several of my colleagues have told me that they don't see my post  
distributed by email, unless someone responds.  Same with me. I am  resending this 
since it was not emailed out yesterday when I origionally  sent it.  Jim Bopp

In a message dated 10/21/2016 11:59:37 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
_JBoppjr at aol.com_ (mailto:JBoppjr at aol.com)  writes:

This is Rick's third personal attack on me in the last 3 days:

The first and second are here:

Rick, this is the second time in so many days that you have  personally 
attacked me.

Yesterday you said:

3.        If you don’t like the  selection of articles, you can continue to 
send your own.  Or you can  unsubscribe to this list. Or you can do with my 
posts what some list  members tell me they do with yours: delete without  
reading.

I am sure  every one on this list serve has deleted posts without reading 
them,  including myself, but I have never felt a need to personally attack 
them  by publicly broadcasting that.

And  today:

I always thought  of you as a straight shooter before this election and 
this voter fraud  garbage. We’ve disagreed but I’ve seen you as making 
fundamentally honest  arguments. 

It is an unfortunate trait of some to assume that  because they disagree 
with someone, the other one is being  "dishonest."  I am sorry to see that you 
are in that  number.

And now below Rick says:

Of course, a comparable ad hominem attack that someone could, but  
shouldn't, make on Rick would be "For (Rick Hasen) to (attack) this  statement which 
(ensures accountability in our electoral system by not  waiving the 
possibilities of a recount in a close election) is  disappointing but not 
surprising. (Rick) is a hard-core (leftist) who  cares about the balance of power on 
the Supreme Court more that anything  else. A (Trump) presidency could bring 
his years long project to (gut the  First Amendment) to a halt."

This statement shouldn't be made about Rick, not because it  is not true, 
but because we should try to rise above these personal  attacks if possible. 
And three in three days by Rick on me is really  a bit too much. Jim Bopp

In a message dated 10/21/2016 11:00:55 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
_rhasen at law.uci.edu_ (mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu)  writes:

_Jim Bopp and I Differ in  Understanding Trump’s Comments About Not 
Conceding_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87878)  
Posted on _October 21, 2016 7:47  am_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87878) 
 by _Rick  Hasen_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3)  
_What  else is new?_ 
(https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/788946270471749637/photo/1)  

(https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87878&title=Jim%20Bopp%20and%20I%20Differ%20in%20Understanding%20Trump’
s%20Comments%20About%20Not%20Conceding)  
Posted in _election  administration_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18) , 
_The Voting  Wars_ (http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60) 

_______________________________________________
Law-election  mailing  list
Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161023/6a1dbeb6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Untitled.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 46256 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161023/6a1dbeb6/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 2021 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161023/6a1dbeb6/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Untitled.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 46278 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161023/6a1dbeb6/attachment-0001.jpg>