[EL] Rick's disagreement with my statement about Trump

Sat Oct 22 11:22:11 PDT 2016

I think it is time to take this personal fight off this listserv. This is
not about election law in any reasonable construction of the topic.

On Oct 22, 2016 1:17 PM, "Kathay Feng" <kfeng at commoncause.org> wrote:

> I thought hard core conservative was a compliment, generally taken as a
> badge honor by those who choose to wear it.‎ Is it the "hard core" part
> that strikes you as an attack?
>
> I think Rick's been exceedingly fair in allowing the diatribes on both
> sides to fill our inboxes. Thanks, Rick, and thank you for reminding us
> that we can all choose to read with interest, respond, unsubscribe, or
> delete.
>
> ‎(delete)
> ‎
>
> *From: *Rick Hasen
> *Sent: *Saturday, October 22, 2016 6:33 AM
> *To: *law-election at uci.edu
> *Subject: *Re: [EL] Rick's disagreement with my statement about Trump
>
> If I'm counting right people on the list will now have seen this five
> times. There must be an issue on your end.
>
> Rick Hasen
> Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse typos.
>
> _____________________________
> From: jboppjr at aol.com
> Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 6:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Rick's disagreement with my statement about Trump
> To: Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu>, <law-election at uci.edu>
> Cc: <lowenstein at law.ucla.edu>
>
>
> This post was not emailed out.  I am asking that that be done.  Jim
>
> In a message dated 10/22/2016 8:59:56 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> rhasen at law.uci.edu writes:
>
> We have had some problems in the past with aol users receiving messages.
> One can always check archives to see if a message was sent out.
>
> Rick Hasen
> Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse typos.
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 5:17 AM -0700, "JBoppjr at aol.com" <JBoppjr at aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> Several of my colleagues have told me that they don't see my post
> distributed by email, unless someone responds.  Same with me. I am
> resending this since it was not emailed out yesterday when I origionally
> sent it.  Jim Bopp
>
> In a message dated 10/21/2016 11:59:37 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> JBoppjr at aol.com writes:
>
> This is Rick's third personal attack on me in the last 3 days:
>
> The first and second are here:
>
> *Rick, this is the second time in so many days that you have personally
> attacked me.*
>
> *Yesterday you said:*
>
> *3.       If you don’t like the selection of articles, you can continue to
> send your own.  Or you can unsubscribe to this list. Or you can do with my
> posts what some list members tell me they do with yours: delete without
> reading.*
>
> *I am sure every one on this list serve has deleted posts without reading
> them, including myself, but I have never felt a need to personally attack
> them by publicly broadcasting that.*
>
> *And today:*
>
> *I always thought of you as a straight shooter before this election and
> this voter fraud garbage. We’ve disagreed but I’ve seen you as making
> fundamentally honest arguments. *
>
> *It is an unfortunate trait of some to assume that because they disagree
> with someone, the other one is being "dishonest."  I am sorry to see that
> you are in that number.*
>
> And now below Rick says:
>
> Of course, a comparable ad hominem attack that someone could, but
> shouldn't, make on Rick would be "For (Rick Hasen) to (attack) this
> statement which (ensures accountability in our electoral system by not
> waiving the possibilities of a recount in a close election) is
> disappointing but not surprising. (Rick) is a hard-core (leftist) who cares
> about the balance of power on the Supreme Court more that anything else. A
> (Trump) presidency could bring his years long project to (gut the First
> Amendment) to a halt."
>
> This statement shouldn't be made about Rick, not because it is not true,
> but because we should try to rise above these personal attacks if
> possible. And three in three days by Rick on me is really a bit too
> much. Jim Bopp
>
> In a message dated 10/21/2016 11:00:55 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> rhasen at law.uci.edu writes:
>
> *Jim Bopp and I Differ in Understanding Trump’s Comments About Not
> Conceding <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87878>*
>
> Posted on October 21, 2016 7:47 am <http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87878>
>  by *Rick Hasen* <http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
>
> What else is new?
> <https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/788946270471749637/photo/1>
>
> [image:
> https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=87878&title=Jim
> Bopp and I Differ in Understanding Trumpâ€™s Comments About Not Conceding]
> <https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D87878&title=Jim%20Bopp%20and%20I%20Differ%20in%20Understanding%20Trump%E2%80%99s%20Comments%20About%20Not%20Conceding>
>
> Posted in election administration <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>, The
> Voting Wars <http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161022/4eff1da9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/unknown
Size: 2021 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161022/4eff1da9/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Untitled.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 46278 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20161022/4eff1da9/attachment.jpg>