[EL] What could be done

[David A. Holtzman]

Jon wrote, /"One should distinguish between releasing information that 
is true from information that is not ("Fake news"), or from simple 
propaganda. It seems everything released through Wikileaks or from the 
State Dept or FBI was true. Can't object to that."/

I've been meaning to point out (and don't think anyone else here has) 
that this type of thinking logically disappears attorney-client 
privilege and the exclusionary rule.  Poof!

Let's not legitimize ex parte election shenanigans.

   - dah


On 1/8/2017 1:57 PM, jon.roland at constitution.org wrote:
> I am getting two copies of every message from the listserv. Is anyone 
> else experiencing this? It is annoying.
>
> One should distinguish between releasing information that is true from 
> information that is not ("Fake news"), or from simple propaganda. It 
> seems everything released through Wikileaks or from the State Dept or 
> FBI was true. Can't object to that.
>
> My personal experience with hacking has been of websites I manage. 
> Very annoying. I have been able to track down the countries of origin 
> of most of them. One came from France, a ransomware hack from an 
> Algerian Islamist group that I cleared by restoring from backup. 
> Another was a hack from the Philippines that seemed to penetrate my 
> encryption, but didn't do any real damage. Changed passwords.  Most 
> have been from Russia, but I doubt from the Russian government. Mostly 
> hijacking of my site has been to sell drugs, or to borrow pagerank. I 
> doubt the government would bother with that. China had us blocked for 
> a while, but I understand ineffectively, as Chinese seem to be able to 
> work around it. (We advocate freedom for Tibet.)
>
> So most likely some freelance hackers, or whistleblowers. Of course 
> the Russian government reads what they disclose.
>
> How in the world could Comey refusing to recommend indictment have 
> caused people to vote against Clinton, unless it merely confirmed 
> their opinion of the reach of her corruption? Likely it increased the 
> turnout for Trump.  Would she have preferred him to recommend indictment?
>
> Bizarro election. Future historians will have trouble believing it.
> _________________________________
> New Amazon Kindle book by Jon Roland
> Wayward World: A new kind of hero must set history on a different 
> course to save Earth from destruction a thousand years in the future.
> https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01MPW3Y10
>
> -- Jon
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Constitution Society http://constitution.org
> 11447 Woollcott St twitter.com/lex_rex
> San Antonio, TX 78251 512/299-5001 jon.roland at constitution.org
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election


-- 
David A. Holtzman, M.P.H., J.D.
david at holtzmanlaw.com

Notice: This email (including any files transmitted with it) may be 
confidential, for use only by intended recipients.  If you are not an 
intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this email to 
an intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in 
error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying 
of this email is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email 
in error, please immediately notify the sender and discard all copies.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20170116/7cde5333/attachment.html>