[EL] North Caroline judicial candidates -- party labels

[Rick Hasen]

No proof. These are thoughts some have shared with me.

Rick Hasen
Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse typos.

_____________________________
From: jboppjr at aol.com<mailto:jboppjr at aol.com>
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: North Caroline judicial candidates -- party labels
To: Rick Hasen <rhasen at law.uci.edu<mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu>>, <law-election at uci.edu<mailto:law-election at uci.edu>>


Rick, what is your proof for this scurrilous charge.  Jim

In a message dated 3/24/2017 11:04:37 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, rhasen at law.uci.edu<mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu> writes:
My comment.

Rick Hasen
Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse typos.

________________________________
From:JBoppjr at aol.com<mailto:JBoppjr at aol.com> <JBoppjr at aol.com<mailto:JBoppjr at aol.com>>
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 9:42:27 AM
To: Rick Hasen; law-election at uci.edu<mailto:law-election at uci.edu>
Subject: North Caroline judicial candidates -- party labels

Is this a statement from the BNA article or is a comment by Prof Hasen?

As I understand it, the impetus for this bill was the election of a Democratic state Supreme Court Justice with a “white” sounding name and no party label.

Jim Bopp

In a message dated 3/23/2017 10:24:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, rhasen at law.uci.edu<mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu> writes:
“Party Labels Back for North Carolina Judges”<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=91776>
Posted on March 23, 2017 6:31 pm<http://electionlawblog.org/?p=91776> by Rick Hasen<http://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>
Bloomberg BNA:<http://news.bna.com/mpdm/MPDMWB/split_display.adp?fedfid=107884942&vname=mpebulallissues&jd=a0m1b5h4x8&split=0>
Starting next year, ballots listing candidates for North Carolina’s superior and district courts will once again include their party affiliations.
Both the state House and Senate garnered enough votes to override Gov. Roy Cooper’s (D) March 16 veto of H.B. 100<http://src.bna.com/m3W>. Both votes were largely along party lines, with Republicans generally supporting the override and Democrats voting against it.
As I understand it, the impetus for this bill was the election of a Democratic state Supreme Court Justice with a “white” sounding name and no party label.
[https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http://electionlawblog.org/?p=91776&title=“Party Labels Back for North Carolina Judges”]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=http%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D91776&title=%E2%80%9CParty%20Labels%20Back%20for%20North%20Carolina%20Judges%E2%80%9D>
Posted in Uncategorized<http://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20170324/969caa17/attachment.html>