[EL] ELB News and Commentary 12/20/18

Thu Dec 20 11:44:11 PST 2018

Light Blogging Through New Year’s<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102958>
Posted on December 20, 2018 11:41 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102958> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

I’ll be around for any major news but moving to light blogging mode until January.

Those on the listserv receiving ELB posts will see them less frequently.

[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102958&title=Light%20Blogging%20Through%20New%20Year%E2%80%99s>
Posted in Uncategorized<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>

My Academic Articles, 2016<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102956>
Posted on December 20, 2018 11:37 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102956> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Moving these off the sidebar as well:

Softening Voter ID Laws Through Litigation: Is it Enough?<http://wisconsinlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Hasen-Final.pdf>, 2016 Wisconsin Law Review Forward 100 (2016)

Election Law’s Path in the Roberts Court’s First Decade: A Sharp Right Turn But with Speed Bumps and Surprising Twists<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2639902>, 68 Stanford Law Review 1597 (2016)

Reining in the Purcell Principle<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2545676>, 43 Florida State University Law Review 427 (2016) )

Celebrity Justice: Supreme Court Edition<http://www.greenbag.org/v19n2/v19n2_articles_hasen.pdf>, 19 Green Bag 2d 157 (Winter 2016)
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102956&title=My%20Academic%20Articles%2C%202016>
Posted in Uncategorized<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>

My Opeds and Commentaries, 2017<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102954>
Posted on December 20, 2018 11:33 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102954> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Moving these off the sidebar as I spruce things up around here:

Is the Supreme Court finally ready to tackle partisan gerrymandering? Signs suggest yes<http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-hasen-gerrymandering-maryland-20171211-story.html>, Los Angeles Times, December 11, 2017

Vote Suppressors Unleashed<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/11/donald_trump_will_supercharge_voter_suppression_if_the_rnc_consent_decree.html>, Slate, November 27, 2017

Why Banning Russian Facebook Ads Might Be Impossible<https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/09/26/russian-facebook-ads-regulation-215647>, Politico, September 26, 2017

Speech in America is Fast, Cheap, and Out of Control<http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-hasen-cheap-speech-democracy-20170818-story.html>, Los Angeles Times, August 18, 2017

Don’t Let Our Democracy Collapse<https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/15/opinion/sunday/dont-let-our-democracy-collapse.html>, New York Times (Sunday Review), July 15, 2017

Donald Trump Jr.’s Free Speech Defense: It’s As Bogus As It Sounds<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/07/donald_trump_jr_s_free_speech_defense_is_as_bogus_as_it_sounds.html>, Slate, July 12, 2017

Trump’s Voter Fraud Endgame<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/06/donald_trump_s_voter_fraud_commission_is_itself_an_enormous_fraud.html>, Slate, June 30, 2017

The Supreme Court is in No Hurry to Protect Voters from Gerrymandering<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2017/06/28/the-supreme-court-is-in-no-hurry-to-protect-voters-from-gerrymandering/?utm_term=.1c6b6216e091>, Washington Post(Post Everything), June 28, 2017

Gorsuch is the New Scalia, Just Like Trump Promised<http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-hasen-gorsuch-scalia-20170627-story.html>, Los Angeles Times, June 27, 2017

Justice Kennedy’s Beauty Pageant<https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/06/justice-kennedys-beauty-pageant/530790/>, The Atlantic, June 19, 2017

Commentary: Dunlap badly mistaken in agreeing to serve on Trump voter fraud panel<http://www.pressherald.com/2017/05/24/commentary-dunlap-badly-mistaken-in-agreeing-to-serve-on-trump-voter-fraud-panel/>, Portland Press-Herald, May 24, 2017

The Supreme Court may just have given voting rights activists a powerful new tool<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/voting-rights-activists-should-love-todays-supreme-court-ruling/2017/05/22/9443d726-3f2f-11e7-9869-bac8b446820a_story.html?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.0d322e36d57b>, Washington Post, May 22, 2017

In the future, John Roberts could be the Supreme Court’s swing vote<http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-hasen-roberts-swing-vote-20170410-story.html>, Los Angeles Times, April 10, 2017

How States Could Force Trump to Release His Tax Returns<http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/donald-trump-tax-returns-release-214950>, Politico Magazine, March 30, 2017

Does the First Amendment Protect Trump’s Travel Ban?<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/03/the_9th_circuit_s_alex_kozinski_defends_trump_s_travel_ban_on_first_amendment.html>, Slate, March 20, 2017

Why Gorsuch Could Lead Court in Wrong Direction<http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/01/opinions/worry-about-gorsuch-hasen/>, CNN, March 1, 2017

There’s a Simple Step North Carolina’s New Governor Could Take to Strengthen Voting Rights, Slate, February 2, 2017<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/02/north_carolina_should_withdraw_its_petition_to_the_supreme_court_in_its.html>

Trump’s Voting Investigation Is a Great Idea; As long as it looks like this<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/01/trump_s_voting_fraud_investigation_is_a_great_idea.html?wpsrc=sh_all_dt_tw_top>, Slate, January 22, 2017
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102954&title=My%20Opeds%20and%20Commentaries%2C%202017>
Posted in Uncategorized<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>

Trump to Larry King in 1999: “Nobody Knows More About Campaign Finance than I Do”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102952>
Posted on December 20, 2018 10:44 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102952> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

https://youtu.be/svlmyI0a7QY

[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102952&title=Trump%20to%20Larry%20King%20in%201999%3A%20%E2%80%9CNobody%20Knows%20More%20About%20Campaign%20Finance%20than%20I%20Do%E2%80%9D>
Posted in Uncategorized<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>

“Michigan GOP OKs shielding donors; ‘power grab’ bill stalls”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102950>
Posted on December 20, 2018 10:34 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102950> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

AP:<https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation-politics/gop-power-play-in-michigan-must-go-through-pragmatic-snyder-2/>

Michigan Republicans voted Tuesday to make it a crime for government agencies to require the disclosure of nonprofits’ donors and other information, a move decried by critics as shielding political “dark money” but defended by supporters as protecting people’s right to freedom of association.

The GOP-controlled House approved the bill 58-51, largely on party lines. It will go to Republican Gov. Rick Snyder following a procedural step in this final week of a frantic lame-duck session.

The vote came as another contentious measure, to strip campaign finance oversight authority from Democratic Secretary of State-elect Jocelyn Benson and shift it to a new bipartisan commission, was in serious trouble. A committee agenda that was posted late Tuesday did not include the Senate-passed legislation — considered by many to be the most egregious among several GOP “power grabs” — after it drew opposition from Democrats and many Republicans in the House.
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102950&title=%E2%80%9CMichigan%20GOP%20OKs%20shielding%20donors%3B%20%E2%80%98power%20grab%E2%80%99%20bill%20stalls%E2%80%9D>
Posted in campaign finance<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>

North Carolina: “Shadowy 9th District figure says he took cash in 2014 election”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102947>
Posted on December 20, 2018 10:31 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102947> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WRAL:<https://www.wral.com/shadowy-9th-district-figure-says-he-took-cash-in-2014-election/18074896/>

The man at the center of a state inquiry into 9th Congressional District election results indicated in a signed declaration last year that he essentially took cash under the table during the 2014 elections to help Bladen County’s current sheriff.

McCrae Dowless, who worked this year for Republican congressional hopeful Mark Harris’ campaign, as well as for Sheriff Jim McVicker’s re-election, said in the declaration<https://www.wral.com/news/state/nccapitol/document/18075250/> that he took $5,800 in 2014 from a Bladen County sweepstakes parlor operator. He said it was cash he needed to pay a team of campaign workers.

Dowless said the money flowed after conversations with McVicker’s campaign manager, former Bladen County Republican Party Chairman Landon Bordeaux. In a separate legal filing, sweepstakes parlor owner Jeff Smith testified that he made these payments at Bordeaux’s request.
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102947&title=North%20Carolina%3A%20%E2%80%9CShadowy%209th%20District%20figure%20says%20he%20took%20cash%20in%202014%20election%E2%80%9D>
Posted in campaigns<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>

“Small-Donor Matching Funds for New York State Elections: A Policy Analysis of the Potential Impact and Cost”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102945>
Posted on December 20, 2018 10:28 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102945> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Campaign Finance Institute:<http://www.cfinst.org/Press/PReleases/18-12-20/Small-Donor_Matching_Funds_for_New_York_State_Elections_A_Policy_Analysis_of_the_Potential_Impact_and_Cost.aspx>
There is every reason to believe campaign finance reform will be high on the agenda for the New York State Legislature in 2019. The state’s governor, Andrew Cuomo has proposed small-donor matching fund programs since he took office in 2011, but his proposals have foundered in the Republican-led Senate. After the 2018 election put Democrats in a majority in both chambers, the Assembly and Senate will each have as its leader someone who has been on record as a sponsor of small-donor matching funds. While nothing can ever be certain, the odds clearly have changed.

[http://www.cfinst.org/images/email/KeyFindings.png]In light of this situation, the Campaign Finance Institute (CFI) today has released “Small-Donor Matching Funds in New York State Elections: A Policy Analysis of the Potential Impact and Cost <http://www.cfinst.org/pdf/State/NY/Policy-Analysis_Public-Financing-in-NY-State_Dec2018.pdf> .” The full report<http://www.cfinst.org/pdf/State/NY/Policy-Analysis_Public-Financing-in-NY-State_Dec2018.pdf> is based on a rigorous analysis of how key provisions in the governor’s past bills would have affected each of the candidates who ran in 2014 or 2018. While the legislative details may change in 2019, this is a reasonable starting point for future discussion.

The main proposals would reduce the state’s high campaign contribution limits, eliminate a glaring contribution loophole used by limited liability corporations (LLCs), and introduce a small-donor matching fund system for state elections modeled after the successful one in New York City. The goal would be to combat corruption and the appearance of corruption by making the state’s elected officials less dependent on large donors while heightening the connections between them and their less wealthy constituents. …

[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102945&title=%E2%80%9CSmall-Donor%20Matching%20Funds%20for%20New%20York%20State%20Elections%3A%20A%20Policy%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Potential%20Impact%20and%20Cost%E2%80%9D>
Posted in campaign finance<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>

Full HuffPost Podcast Series on Voting Rights Now Available<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102943>
Posted on December 20, 2018 10:26 am<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102943> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Listen. <https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/shut-out/id1446467576>
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102943&title=Full%20HuffPost%20Podcast%20Series%20on%20Voting%20Rights%20Now%20Available>
Posted in The Voting Wars<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=60>

“Why Deep Blue New York Is ‘Voter Suppression Land’”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102941>
Posted on December 19, 2018 4:35 pm<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102941> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

NYT:<https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/nyregion/early-voting-reform-laws-ny.html>

In 2016, when the governor of Ohio was asked why he had signed a bill to limit early voting, he had a simple retort<http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/kasich-denies-cutting-voting-access-was-partisan-move>: He pointed to another state that had no early voting at all.

When North Carolina’s governor was sued for cutting early voting in his own state, his lawyers cited that same state<https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legal-work/Brief_for_Appellees_6_9_16.pdf#page=60> as rebuttal.

In each case, the state in question was New York. Deep blue, liberal-ideal New York.

Despite its reputation for sterling progressivism, New York has some of the most restrictive election laws in the nation. It is one of just 12 states without early voting. No other state holds its federal and state primary elections on different days. Voters who want to change their party affiliation must do so more than a year before the election, a rule that famously left Ivanka Trump unable to vote for her father<https://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-gop-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/ivanka-trump-new-york-221869> in the 2016 Republican primary….

Not only Republicans are to blame for the inertia of voting reform in New York, according to Wendy Weiser, the director of the Democracy Program at New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice. Machine politics and the advantages of incumbency make many politicians wary of changing the system.

“Elected officials often oppose changes to the electoral system in which they were elected,” Ms. Weiser said. “It’s the incumbency protection agency: ‘It worked for me, it must be a good system.’”

Mr. Lavine said he expected early voting and merging primaries to pass immediately, but he was more reserved on the prospects of public financing of campaigns or a ban on corporate money; he said the Assembly would give those ideas “great consideration.”
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102941&title=%E2%80%9CWhy%20Deep%20Blue%20New%20York%20Is%20%E2%80%98Voter%20Suppression%20Land%E2%80%99%E2%80%9D>
Posted in election administration<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=18>

“Voter Confidence in the 2018 Election: So Long to the Winner’s Effect?”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102939>
Posted on December 19, 2018 4:22 pm<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102939> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Charles Stewart:<https://electionupdates.caltech.edu/2018/12/19/voter-confidence-in-the-2018-election-so-long-to-the-winners-effect/>

For the past two decades, Americans have consistently exhibited a “winner’s effect” in judging whether votes were counted fairly in elections.  The 2018 election broke that pattern.

In particular, prior to 2018, it was common for voters who identified with the prevailing party in a federal election to acquire much greater confidence post-election that votes were counted as intended.  Conversely, members of the vanquished party became much less confident.

Not in 2018.

In a nationwide survey of adults I conducted in the days immediately after the 2018 federal election, 84% of voters stated they were either “very” or “somewhat” confident that their vote was counted as they intended.  (Throughout this post, I will refer to these respondents as “confident.”)  This is virtually identical to the response they gave a month before the election.  In contrast with patterns from past elections, the results of the election had no effect on overall levels of confident, and essentially no effect on differences between the parties.

The data in this post were taken from two surveys I conducted before the election (during May 14–16 and October 5–7) and one after (on November 7–9).  In each case, the surveys interviewed 1,000 adults as a part of the YouGov Omnibus survey.  The research was supported by a grant from NEO Philanthropy, which bears no responsibility for the results or analysis.  I will contrast the results I found in 2018 with similar research I performed in the 2014 and 2016 federal elections, plus a peer-reviewed article<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.08.004> I published in 2015 with Mike Sances, which examined the history of voter confidence from 2000 to 2012.
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102939&title=%E2%80%9CVoter%20Confidence%20in%20the%202018%20Election%3A%20So%20Long%20to%20the%20Winner%E2%80%99s%20Effect%3F%E2%80%9D>
Posted in Uncategorized<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>

“Trump 2020 campaign used a shell company to pay ad buyers at the center of alleged illegal coordination scheme with NRA”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102937>
Posted on December 19, 2018 4:13 pm<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102937> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

Center for Responsive Politics<https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2018/12/trump-2020-campaign-coordination/>:

The Trump campaign funneled money to ad buyers alleged to have facilitated illegal coordination between the campaign and the NRA by routing funds through a secretive LLC that appears to be little more than a shell company, an investigation by the Center for Responsive Politics has found.

While the Trump campaign stopped reporting payments to ad buyers alleged<https://www.thetrace.org/2018/12/trump-nra-campaign-coordination/> to have facilitated illegal coordination between the campaign and the NRA after the 2016 election cycle, Trump’s 2020 campaign has continued to deploy the same individuals working for the firms at the center of the controversy through payments to Harris Sikes Media LLC — a low-profile limited-liability company operating with no website or public-facing facade whatsoever.

Facing the illegal coordination allegations are National Media, Red Eagle Media Group and American Media & Advocacy Group (AMAG), closely tied consultancies that share staff, resources and adjacent storefronts in Alexandria, Va.

CRP’s analysis of Federal Communications Commission (FCC) records<https://www.opensecrets.org/ad-data/> found that Trump campaign political ad disclosures on file with stations across the country have continued to include signatures and names of individuals working for National Media, despite no mention of National Media or its known affiliates on any FCC or Federal Election Commission (FEC) disclosures. Those individual ad buyers’ names have simultaneously continued to be included in ad documents for the National Rifle Association<https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=d000000082> (NRA) and America First<https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.php?strID=C00637512&cycle=2018>, but with the ad buyers’ affiliation listed as National Media or one of its affiliates.

Common vendors are one of the factors<https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/candidate-taking-receipts/coordinated-communications/> federal regulators consider when determining if communications may constitute illegal coordination between a campaign and outside group.

Harris Sikes Media does not appear to have any contacts independent of National Media, and all of the individuals listed on FCC filings submitted by Harris Sikes Media have also been featured in filings by National Media or its affiliates.
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102937&title=%E2%80%9CTrump%202020%20campaign%20used%20a%20shell%20company%20to%20pay%20ad%20buyers%20at%20the%20center%20of%20alleged%20illegal%20coordination%20scheme%20with%20NRA%E2%80%9D>
Posted in campaign finance<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>, campaigns<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>

“Trump Testimony From Decades Ago Indicates Knowledge of Campaign-Finance Laws”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102934>
Posted on December 19, 2018 4:10 pm<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102934> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

WSJ:<https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-testimony-from-decades-ago-indicates-knowledge-of-campaign-finance-laws-11545257201?mod=searchresults&page=1&pos=1>

Sworn statements by President Trump dating back several decades indicate he has a deep understanding of campaign-finance laws, legal experts say, which could be critical if investigators ever pursue a case against him over his alleged direction of hush-money payments <https://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-played-central-role-in-hush-payoffs-to-stormy-daniels-and-karen-mcdougal-1541786601?mod=article_inline> in the 2016 campaign.

Mr. Trump’s statements were made as part of a 2000 regulatory investigation into his casino company and in 1988 testimony <http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/trump_testimony_NY_commission_1988.pdf?mod=article_inline> for a government-integrity commission. They contrast with the portrayal by some of the president’s allies that he is a political novice with little understanding of campaign-finance laws and therefore couldn’t be charged with violating them.

In 2000, the Federal Election Commission investigated allegations that Trump Hotels & Casinos violated the law related to a fundraising event for a Senate candidate. Mr. Trump’s sworn affidavit <http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/Trump_Campaign_Finance_Affidavit_2000.pdf?mod=article_inline> “indicates that Trump had a very thorough understanding of federal campaign finance law, especially regarding what he could and could not legally do when raising money for a federal candidate,” said Brett Kappel, an election-law lawyer at Akerman LLP.

In the four-page affidavit that Mr. Trump signed, he stressed he had a particular familiarity with laws governing corporate contributions to candidates. Mr. Trump said he was acting in his “individual,” not corporate, capacity when he hosted the event; that he had paid for the reception costs “from my personal funds”; that he “took no action, of any nature, kind or description, to compel or pressure” any employee to donate to the campaign ahead of the event; and that he wasn’t reimbursed for any of the costs.

The FEC decided to take no action against the company.

In December, federal prosecutors in New York directly implicated the president in campaign-finance violations to which his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, has pleaded guilty, confirming earlier reporting by The Wall Street Journal. During the 2016 campaign, Mr. Trump directed Mr. Cohen to arrange hush-money payments<https://www.wsj.com/articles/prosecutors-call-for-substantial-prison-term-for-michael-cohen-1544219750?mod=article_inline> for two women who alleged having sexual affairs with Mr. Trump, prosecutors said.

To obtain a conviction of violating campaign-finance law, prosecutors would have to prove Mr. Trump knew the rules and violated them willfully. Allies of Mr. Trump have contended that wasn’t the case.
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102934&title=%E2%80%9CTrump%20Testimony%20From%20Decades%20Ago%20Indicates%20Knowledge%20of%20Campaign-Finance%20Laws%E2%80%9D>
Posted in campaign finance<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=10>

North Carolina: “‘Do u care who u vote for?’ 2016 investigation found evidence of ballot harvesting”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102932>
Posted on December 19, 2018 4:04 pm<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102932> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

News and Observer<https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article223316015.html>:

McCrae Dowless, a Bladen County elected official and political operative, paid workers to collect absentee ballots and return them to him before the 2016 election, witnesses told state board of election investigators, according to documents released Wednesday<https://s3.amazonaws.com/dl.ncsbe.gov/State_Board_Meeting_Docs/Congressional_District_9_Portal/2.2.2.1%20Exhibit.pdf> afternoon.

The State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement released the documents as part of its investigation into mail-in absentee ballot and voting irregularities during the 2018 election in Bladen and Robeson counties. The board has declined to certify the results of North Carolina’s 9th Congressional District race as a result.

In 2018, Republican Mark Harris — the apparent winner of the 9th district election by 905 votes over Democrat Dan McCready — hired Dowless to work on absentee ballots and get-out-the-vote operations in Bladen County.

The 2016 investigation found “information strongly suggesting” that Dowless “was paying certain individuals to solicit absentee request forms and to collect absentee ballots from Bladen County voters. In doing so, workers employed by Dowless were required to hand-carry the ballots to Dowless in order to be paid,” the board wrote in a January 2018 summary of its 2016 investigations.

It is illegal, outside of very specific circumstances, to collect someone else’s absentee ballot.

The state board turned over three cases — two involving Dowless and one involving the Bladen County Improvement Association — to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, according to the summary.

A spokesperson for U.S. Attorney Robert Higdon’s office declined to comment Wednesday.

Similar allegations have surfaced during the 2018 election.
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102932&title=North%20Carolina%3A%20%E2%80%9C%E2%80%98Do%20u%20care%20who%20u%20vote%20for%3F%E2%80%99%202016%20investigation%20found%20evidence%20of%20ballot%20harvesting%E2%80%9D>
Posted in campaigns<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=59>, chicanery<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=12>

New North Carolina Voter ID Law Challenged in State Court<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102930>
Posted on December 19, 2018 1:32 pm<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102930> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

As expected. <https://www.southerncoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Holmes-v-Moore-Final.pdf>
[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102930&title=New%20North%20Carolina%20Voter%20ID%20Law%20Challenged%20in%20State%20Court>
Posted in Uncategorized<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>

“Flipping the Narrative: Taking the Voting Rights Struggle from Defense to Offense”<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102928>
Posted on December 19, 2018 1:21 pm<https://electionlawblog.org/?p=102928> by Rick Hasen<https://electionlawblog.org/?author=3>

I’m looking forward to participating in this event<https://www.acslaw.org/event/flipping-the-narrative-taking-the-voting-rights-struggle-from-defense-to-offense/> on January 14 in DC:
ACS<https://www.acslaw.org/> > Events<https://www.acslaw.org/event/>

January 14, 2019

12:00 PM – 2:00 PM , Eastern Time

Flipping the Narrative: Taking the Voting Rights Struggle from Defense to Offense
________________________________

Much of the narrative around voting and representation over the last decade has focused on efforts to shrink the electorate and gerrymander political districts, and the progressive response to those efforts. Yet, innovative ideas have also been proposed to expand the electorate and to ensure that representatives better resemble their state constituents. Some propose expanding voter rights at the local level for certain populations typically denied that right, while others suggest an aggressive congressional agenda to pass voting rights legislation or strengthen the legitimacy of our political representation by changing the way we vote for our elected officials. Why are these proposals more likely to gain traction than other ideas? What can the progressive movement do to support these efforts?

Join ACS for a discussion of an affirmative agenda for voting rights.

Featuring:

Pema Levy, Reporter, Mother Jones

Joshua Douglas, Thomas P. Lewis Professor Law, University of Kentucky College of Law

Jamal Greene, Dwight Professor of Law, Columbia Law School

Richard Hasen, Chancellor’s Professor of Law and Political Science, UC Irvine School of Law

Marina Jenkins, Litigation Director, National Redistricting Foundation

Monday, January 14, 2019 at 12:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. EDT, Jenner & Block LLP, 1099 New York Avenue NW, #900, Washington, DC 20001

Lunch will be served beginning at 12:00pm

1.5 hours of CLE will be offered.
REGISTER HERE<https://getinvolved.acslaw.org/component/events/event/173>

[Share]<https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Felectionlawblog.org%2F%3Fp%3D102928&title=%E2%80%9CFlipping%20the%20Narrative%3A%20Taking%20the%20Voting%20Rights%20Struggle%20from%20Defense%20to%20Offense%E2%80%9D>
Posted in Uncategorized<https://electionlawblog.org/?cat=1>

--
Rick Hasen
Chancellor's Professor of Law and Political Science
UC Irvine School of Law
401 E. Peltason Dr., Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
949.824.3072 - office
rhasen at law.uci.edu<mailto:rhasen at law.uci.edu>
http://www.law.uci.edu/faculty/full-time/hasen/
http://electionlawblog.org<http://electionlawblog.org/>
[signature_1320766008]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20181220/bca35e53/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2021 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20181220/bca35e53/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 10406 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20181220/bca35e53/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 92163 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20181220/bca35e53/attachment-0002.png>