[EL] presidential primary ballot access is easy
daniel smith
dasmith at UFL.EDU
Wed Nov 2 13:31:58 PDT 2011
Well, with respect to major party ballot access being easy, former
Louisiana governor Buddy Roemer might beg to differ. Roemer has been
excluded from both Florida and South Carolina's GOP primary ballots.
According top Roemer, he couldn't afford SC's $35,000 filing fee. And in
FL, where he was campaigning yesterday, he blamed the Florida state GOP
chairman, who "arbitrarily and single-handedly decided to exclude" him
from the ballot." According to a story in the Times-Picayune
<http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2011/11/former_gov_buddy_roemer_exclud.html>,
"Roemer said his 1 percent in Florida in the most recent American
Research Group poll, ties him with former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick
Santorum and former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman -- who had headquartered his
campaign in Florida -- places him ahead of former New Mexico Gov. Gary
Johnson, and puts him only a few points behind Minnesota Rep. Michele
Bachmann, Texas Rep. Ron Paul and Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who were at 3,
4 and 5 percent respectively."
daniel a. smith, ph.d.
professor& uf research foundation professor (2010-2012)
coordinator, political science internship program
department of political science
003 anderson hall | phone: 352-273-2346
po box 117325 | fax: 352-392-8127
university of florida | email: dasmith at ufl.edu
gainesville, fl 32611-7325 | www.clas.ufl.edu/users/dasmith/
| http://twitter.com/electionsmith
On 11/2/2011 4:09 PM, Jeff Hauser wrote:
> Newt Gingrich is heavily in debt, Santorum treading financial water --
> their challenges might be even greater than Cain's.
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Douglas Carver <dhmcarver at gmail.com
> <mailto:dhmcarver at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I can echo what Trevor wrote from the Democratic side -- I worked with
> Bill Richardson's ill-fated campaign, and it took substantial time,
> effort, and staffing to get on the various ballots. I do not know
> about Cain's organization, but what little I have read seems to show
> that it is small, and possibly not up to this task.
>
> Douglas Carver
> Santa Fe, NM
>
> PS -- I apologize if this thread has moved on -- I am catching up on
> old posts today.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Trevor Potter
> <tpotter at capdale.com <mailto:tpotter at capdale.com>> wrote:
> > I always fear to disagree with Richard Winger on ballot access
> as he knows so much more than I. BUT as McCain general counsel I
> found ballot access a huge task. McCain had little money to spare
> throughout the primaries, so we had to rely on local volunteers.
> While some states allow a campaign to get on the primary ballot
> through the easy methods mention below, many require real legwork.
> We spent thousands (literally)of hours making sure we qualified in
> Indiana and Virginia.
> >
> > On the Democratic side the Presidential candidates benefited
> from shared petition drives under local party auspices. That never
> occurs on the GOP side-the better financed candidates believe they
> have a competitive edge and do not want it diluted. As a result
> the RNC in 2008 played "fair" and provided absolutely no help to
> any campaign.
> >
> > Further, I am not clear if the "qualified for federal matching
> funds" ballot access option (enshrined in many stat's laws, and
> used by McCain last time even though he ended up not taking those
> funds) is being used by any GOP candidate this year. Does anyone
> know if any of the candidates has taken steps at the FEC to
> qualify? If not, the ballot access hurdle is significantly higher .
> > Trevor Potter
> >
> > Sent by Good Messaging (www.good.com <http://www.good.com>)
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richard Winger [mailto:richardwinger at yahoo.com
> <mailto:richardwinger at yahoo.com>]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 07:08 PM Eastern Standard Time
> > To: Jeff Hauser
> > Cc: law-election at uci.edu <mailto:law-election at uci.edu>
> > Subject: [EL] presidential primary ballot access is easy
> >
> > No state will require Herman Cain, or any other Republican who
> is in the debates, to submit more than 3,000 signatures, except
> that Indiana requires 4,500 and Virginia requires 10,000. Ballot
> access in presidential primaries, for candidates who are discussed
> in the news media, is automatic in about half the states, and in
> other states it is automatic for candidates who qualify for
> primary season matching funds or who pay a filing fee.
> >
> > Severe ballot access laws are reserved for outsiders, like
> independent candidates, minor parties, and presidential primary
> candidates in the major parties who aren't discussed in the news
> media and who don't qualify for primary season matching funds.
> >
> > Richard Winger
> >
> > 415-922-9779 <tel:415-922-9779>
> >
> > PO Box 470296, San Francisco Ca 94147
> >
> > --- On Thu, 10/20/11, Jeff Hauser <jeffhauser at gmail.com
> <mailto:jeffhauser at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > From: Jeff Hauser <jeffhauser at gmail.com
> <mailto:jeffhauser at gmail.com>>
> > Subject: Re: [EL] the wiliness of Herman Cain
> > To: richardwinger at yahoo.com <mailto:richardwinger at yahoo.com>
> > Cc: law-election at uci.edu <mailto:law-election at uci.edu>
> > Date: Thursday, October 20, 2011, 3:52 PM
> >
> > Is there a good summary of the calendar of the GOP ballot access
> and whether cain has a real chance to get on all 50 GOP primary
> ballots? Because I wouldn't assume he will accomplish that.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Richard Winger
> <richardwinger at yahoo.com <mailto:richardwinger at yahoo.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I am starting to think Herman Cain has the same aptitude for
> presidential politics that Ronald Reagan had.
> >
> > Cain has sometimes taken extreme stands, but then he finds a way
> to back away. The value of this is that when he initially takes
> the extreme stand, that makes an emotional connection with the
> voters who share that emotion.
> >
> >
> > For example, abortion. Political Wire earlier today had a
> description of something he said somewhere recently, an interview
> or a speech. He said he is totally pro-life, "no exceptions" for
> pregnancy caused by rape or incest. But then in the next breath
> he says that it doesn't follow logically that his values should be
> enshrined in law and enforced on everyone else.
> >
> >
> > Gays in the military...first he was adamantly opposed to
> repealing Don't Ask Don't Tell. But then later he says this is a
> > settled issue and we should forget about it.
> >
> > On illegal immigrations, first he says he is so opposed to
> illegal immigrants, he wants an electrified fence. But later he
> backs away.
> >
> > In each case, his initial extreme stand, in my opinion, makes an
> favorable emotional impact on voters who like to hear that, even
> though that voter knows inside that the extreme stand is not
> really sensible or viable. So the voter now "likes" Herman Cain,
> because there has been a shared emotion.
> >
> >
> > Ronald Reagan did that also. In his years as a spokesperson for
> General Electric, he was very, very anti-government. When he got
> into office as Governor, of course he doubled the California state
> income tax, signed a bill liberalizing abortion, etc. As
> president he was also pragmatic.
> >
> >
> > Another trait Reagan and Cain have in common is their sunny
> good-naturedness. One would not see either one of them attacking
> a fellow
> > Republican the way Romney and Perry have been attacking each other.
> >
> > Richard Winger
> >
> > 415-922-9779 <tel:415-922-9779>
> >
> > PO Box 470296, San Francisco Ca 94147
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Law-election mailing list
> >
> > Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> <mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
> >
> > http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
> >
> >
> >
> > <- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ->
> > To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS,
> > we inform you that, unless specifically indicated otherwise,
> > any tax advice contained in this communication (including any
> > attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and
> > cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related
> > penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting,
> > marketing, or recommending to another party any tax-related
> > matter addressed herein.
> >
> > This message is for the use of the intended recipient only. It is
> > from a law firm and may contain information that is privileged and
> > confidential. If you are not the intended recipient any disclosure,
> > copying, future distribution, or use of this communication is
> > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
> please
> > advise us by return e-mail, or if you have received this
> communication
> > by fax advise us by telephone and delete/destroy the document.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Law-election mailing list
> > Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> <mailto:Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu>
> > http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dilexi iustitiam et odivi iniquitatem, propterea morior in exilio.
>
> (I have loved justice and hated iniquity, therefore I die in exile.)
>
> -- the last words of Saint Pope Gregory VII (d. 1085)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Law-election mailing list
> Law-election at department-lists.uci.edu
> http://department-lists.uci.edu/mailman/listinfo/law-election
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://webshare.law.ucla.edu/Listservs/law-election/attachments/20111102/2e3efc78/attachment.html>
View list directory