Federal Court Ruling Offers Resounding Victory to TPS Alliance in NTPSA v. Noem
LOS ANGELES – A federal court of appeals on Wednesday ruled that the Trump administration’s 2025 decision to abruptly strip Temporary Protected Status (TPS) from 600,000 Venezuelans was unlawful.
In a 48-page ruling, the three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concluded that Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem’s “actions fundamentally contradict Congress’s statutory design, and her assertion of a raw, unchecked power to vacate a country’s TPS is irreconcilable with the plain language of the statute.” The court affirmed the district court decision setting aside the Secretary’s unlawful action decision as illegal because it was an attempt “to exercise powers Congress simply did not provide under the statute.”
In a powerful concurrence, Judge Mendoza explained he would also have found the administration’s decision unlawful because it was motivated by racial animus against Venezuelans. His decision recounts the history of racist statements by Secretary Noem and President Trump against the Venezuelan population in particular.
The Ninth Circuit’s ruling comes as other federal courts have rejected the administration's explanation for revoking the extension of TPS for Venezuelans, which is not set to expire until October 2026.
The case, NTPSA v. Noem, was filed in February 2025 to challenge the sudden termination of TPS for Venezuelan TPS holders, and later amended to include Haitian TPS holders after DHS Secretary Kristi Noem abruptly ended an extension of TPS for Haiti. It challenges the termination of TPS as unconstitutionally motivated by racial animus and as arbitrary, capricious, and in excess of legal authority in violation of the Administrative Procedure ACT (APA). The government’s actions ending the TPS program for numerous countries are the largest de-documentation of people in this country’s history—stripping hundreds of thousands of people of humanitarian protections in order to justify their deportation.
“Today’s victory shows the strength of the TPS community. As TPS holders face the loss of protections, discrimination, and detention, we will fight with unwavering determination to protect Venezuelan TPS holders and defend all TPS holders nationwide. Congress must act to provide permanent status. Justice for our community demands nothing less,” said Jose Palma, Coordinator of the National TPS Alliance.
The plaintiffs are represented by the National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON), the ACLU Foundations of Northern California and Southern California, the Center for Immigration Law and Policy (CILP) at the UCLA School of Law, and Haitian Bridge Alliance.
“Venezuela and Haiti were the tip of the iceberg, but the administration has proceeded to strip TPS protections from every group of people who have relied on these protections. This is a wholesale effort to destroy the TPS program, which was created for the express purpose of constraining the raw, unchecked power of the executive,” said Emi MacLean, senior staff attorney for the ACLU Foundation of Northern California.
This latest ruling rejects the government’s appeal of the district court's September 5 final ruling that the cancellation of TPS for Venezuelans and Haitians was illegal and must be set aside. On October 3, in an unexplained two-paragraph decision on its shadow docket, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the district court’s ruling and gave the Trump administration free rein to strip people of their rights and place them at immediate risk of detention and deportation by terminating TPS for Venezuelans while the appeal proceeded.
Ahilan Arulanantham, Faculty Co-Director at the UCLA Center for Immigration Law & Policy (CILP), who argued the case on behalf of the plaintiffs, said, “Despite this powerful ruling, the government will no doubt continue illegally detaining and deporting Venezuelan TPS holders because of the unexplained two-paragraph Supreme Court order that stayed the lower court ruling here. Because of the Supreme Court’s earlier action, today's decision does not immediately change anything on the ground. There is no clearer example of the Supreme Court’s lawless behavior than what it has enabled in this case.”
“Despite the Ninth Circuit affirming--again--that Secretary Noem violated the law when she revoked TPS for 600,000 Venezuelans, TPS holders still face detention and deportation because a Supreme Court shadow docket order lets the revocation take effect anyway. The extent of lawlessness in our immigration system right now is truly difficult to comprehend,” said Jessica Bansal, TPS counsel at the National Day Laborer Organizing Network.
Read the ruling HERE.
Founded in 2020, the Center for Immigration Law and Policy (CILP) at the UCLA School of Law expands the law school's role as a national leader in immigration law and policy, generating innovative ideas at the intersection of immigration scholarship and practice and serving as a hub for transforming those ideas into meaningful changes in immigration policy.
Follow CILP on Instagram (@UCLA_CILP), Bluesky (@uclacilp.bsky.social), or sign up for additional news at https://bit.ly/CILPsubscribe.