Amicus Brief for Law Professors in California Restaurant Association v. City of Berkeley 

February 8, 2022
|
Daniel Carpenter-Gold, Cara Horowitz, Julia Stein

On February 8, 2022, as part of the Frank G. Wells Clinic in Environmental Law, Daniel Carpenter-Gold, Cara Horowitz, and Julia Stein filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of seven law professors in the Ninth Circuit case California Restaurant Association v. City of Berkeley, in which the California Restaurant Association (CRA), an industry association, is challenging a Berkeley ordinance barring natural-gas piping in most new buildings on the ground that it is preempted by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). The clinic’s clients are leading experts in energy and environmental law: William Boyd, UCLA; Dan Farber, UC Berkeley; Sharon Jacobs, University of Colorado Boulder; Jim Rossi, Vanderbilt; David Spence, UT Austin; Shelley Welton, University of South Carolina and UPenn; Hannah Wiseman, Penn State. The brief argues that state and local control over utility infrastructure siting is an important element of U.S. energy regulation and Congress showed no intent to eliminate that control in enacting EPCA. Consequently, EPCA does not preempt local ordinances like Berkeley’s.

Download the brief.

News
See All
Apr 28, 2025

Ann Carlson is quoted by the New York Times in an editorial about Trump's actions since taking office

Read More
Apr 24, 2025

Wielding the Power of ISRs: Using Indirect Source Rules to Fight Pollution from Mega Facilities

Read More
Apr 23, 2025

Mary Nichols talks with the LA Times about Los Angeles remaining the nation’s smoggiest city

Read More