Centers Of Excellence

Empirical Research Group

UCLA Law’s Empirical Research Group emphasizes a highly disciplined, methodology-focused approach to the design and execution of quantitative research in law and public policy.

Donate

The Devil Is in the Data

The Empirical Research Group designs and executes quantitative research in law and public policy, with students focused on research design, statistics and data analysis in areas from.

Promoting a broad scope of empirical studies through mentoring, coursework and research support, our Empirical Research Group also offers services including research design, data collection and analysis, and manuscript review.

Students cultivate skills in research design, statistics and data analysis and produce original research on a topic of their choice. Often hired to staff faculty research projects, students are also afforded the opportunity to work with prominent researchers and to enroll in special empirical courses in bankruptcy, housing and public interest law.

For Students

  • Empirical Legal Scholars Program

    The Empirical Legal Scholars Program prepares a small group of UCLA Law students for the academic or policy job market by creating a graduate school environment within the law school. Students receive formal and informal instruction in research methods and statistics to complement their legal coursework, and are guided by a core group of mentors from the Law faculty. They are integrated into ongoing empirical research with UCLA faculty as research assistants and are eligible to join the projects and activities of the UCLA‐RAND Center as Fellows. By the third year of law school students are expected to have designed, conducted and reported empirical research at the level of a second year student in a doctoral program. The program identifies venues for students to present their work and help them refine their presentations. For further information, contact Benjamin Nyblade at nyblade@law.ucla.edu.

  • Independent Research

    Students who are interested in conducting independent empirical research can draw on the support and resources of UCLA Law and the broader UCLA campus. In addition to subject-area faculty expertise within and without the Law School, students can avail themselves of guidance from the Empirical Research Group, from the UCLA Social Science Data Archive, and from the UCLA Statistical Consulting Center. In addition, students can enroll in research methods courses offered by many of the excellent social science graduate departments at UCLA.

  • Empirical Legal Studies Courses

    Visit the UCLA School of Law Curriculum Guide for a listing and information about Empirical Legal Studies courses.

Research

  • About Our Research

    Support for empirical research at UCLA Law is very democratic. Every scholar who wants to bring empirical methods to the study of a question can do so, with no prior experience required. As a consequence, more than half of the full-time faculty have published original empirical scholarship in the last ten years, on a broad range of topics, with varying levels of complexity. The following bibliography represents some of their most recent work.

  • Scholarship

    Steven A. Bank. Dividends and Politics (with Brian Cheffins and Marc Goergen), 25 European Journal of Political Economy 208-224 (2009).

    Samuel L. Bray. The Myth of the Mild Declaratory Judgment, 63 Duke Law Journal 1091 (2014).

    Daniel J. Bussel. Opinions First--Argument Afterwards, 61 UCLA Law Review 1194 (2014).

    Scott Cummings. Managing Pro Bono: Doing Well by Doing Better (with Deborah L. Rhode), 78 Fordham Law Review 2359 (2010).

    Sharon Dolovich. Two Models of the Prison: Accidental Humanity and Hypermasculinity in the L.A. County Jail, 102 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 965 (2012).

    Sharon Dolovich. Strategic Segregation in the Modern Prison, 48 American Criminal Law Review 1 (2011).

    Ingrid Eagly. Criminal Justice for Noncitizens: An Analysis of Variation in Local Enforcement, 88 NYU Law Review 1126 (2013).

    Ingrid Eagly. Local Immigration Prosecution: A Study of Arizona Before SB 1070, 58 UCLA Law Review 1749 (2011).

    Ingrid Eagly. Prosecuting Immigration, 104 Northwestern University Law Review 1281 (2010).

    Carole Goldberg. A Study of the Administration of Justice in Indian Country (with Duane Champagne), Report to the National Institute of Justice, Department of Justice. Washington, DC. August 31, 2011.

    Robert Goldstein. Picturing the Life Course of Procreative Choices, 58 UCLA Law Review Discourse 5 (2010).

    Allison Hoffman. Retiree Out-of-Pocket Healthcare Spending: A Study of Consumer Expectations and Policy Implications (with Howell E. Jackson), 39 American Journal of Law and Medicine 1-72 (2013).

    Jill R. Horwitz. Expansion of Invasive Cardiac Services in the United States (with Austin Nichols, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Comilla Sasson, and Theodore J. Iwashyna), 128(8) Circulation 803-810 (20 August 2013).

    Jill R. Horwitz, , Wellness Incentives in the Workplace: Cost Savings through Cost Shifting to Unhealthy Workers (with Brenna D. Kelly, and John DiNardo), 32(3) Health Affairs 468-476 (2013).

    Jerry Kang. Are Ideal Litigators White? Measuring the Myth of Colorblindness (with Nilanjana Dasgupta, Kumar Yogeeswaran, & Gary Blasi) 7 J. Empirical Leg. Studies 886-915 (2010).

    Kenneth N. Klee. One Size Fits Some: Single Asset Real Estate Bankruptcy Cases, 87 Cornell Law Review 1285-1332 (2002).

    Russell Korobkin. Who Wins in Settlement Negotiations? (with Joseph W. Doherty), 11 American Law and Economics Review 162-208 (2009).

    Maximo Langer. Managerial Judging Goes International but its Promise Remains Unfulfilled: An Empirical Assessment of the ITCY Reforms (with Joseph W. Doherty), 36 Yale Journal of International Law 241 (2011).

    Douglas Lichtman. Rethinking Prosecution History Estoppel, 71 University of Chicago Law Review 151 (2004).

    Gerald P. López. The Health of Undocumented Mexicans in in New York City, 32 Chicano-Latino L. Rev. 1 (2013).

    Gerald P. López. Access to and Use of Health Services Among Undocumented Mexican Immigrants in a U.S. Urban Area (with Arijit Nandi, Sandro Galea, Vijay Nandi, Stacey Strongarone & Danielle C. Ompad), 98 Am. J. Public Health 2011 (2008).

    Gerald P. López. Hunger and Health Among Undocumented Mexican Migrants in a U.S. Urban Area (with Craig Hadley, Sandro Galea, Vijay Nandi, Arijit Nandi, Gerald López, Stacey Strongarone & Danielle Ompad), 11 Public Health Nutr. 151 (2008).

    Lynn M. LoPucki. Controlling Professional Fees in Corporate Bankruptcies: Data, Analysis, and Evaluation (with Joseph W. Doherty). Oxford University Press (2011).

    Lynn M. LoPucki. Bankruptcy Fire Sales (with Joseph W. Doherty), 106(1) Michigan Law Review (2007).

    Timothy Malloy. The Social Construction of Regulation: Lessons from the War Against Command and Control, 58 Buffalo Law Review 267-354 (2010).

    Neil Netanel. Making Sense of Fair Use, 15 Lewis & Clark Law Review 715-771 (2011).

    James Park. Bond Investors and the Evolution of the Securities Class Action, 99 Minn. L. Rev. 585 (2014)

    James Park. Securities Class Actions and Bankrupt Companies, 111 Michigan Law Review 547 (2013).

    Richard H. Sander. Affirmative Action Bans and the "Chilling Effect" (with Kate L. Antonovics), 15 American Law & Economics Review 252 (2013).

    Richard H. Sander. The Secret of My Success: How Status, Eliteness, and School Performance Shape Legal Careers (with Jane Bambauer), 2012 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 893-930 (2012).

    Joanna C. Schwartz. Police Indemnification, 89 New York University Law Review 885 (2014).

    Joanna C. Schwartz. A Dose of Reality for Medical Malpractice Reform, 88 New York University Law Review 1224 (2013).

    Joanna C. Schwartz. What Police Learn from Lawsuits, 33 Cardozo Law Review 841 (2012).

    Kirk J. Stark. Tiebout & Tax Revolts: Did Serrano Really Cause Proposition 13? (with Jonathan M. Zasloff), 50 UCLA Law Review 801-58 (2003).

    Katherine Stone. The Decline in the Standard Employment Contract: Evidence from Ten Advanced Industrial Countries, in Rethinking Workplace Regulation: Beyond the Standard Contract of Employment (edited by Katherine V.W. Stone and Harry Arthurs, Russell Sage Foundation, 2013).

    Rebecca Stone. Pricing Misperceptions: Explaining Pricing Structure in the Cell Phone Service Market (with Oren Bar-Gill), 9 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 430 (2012).

    Alexander Stremitzer. Framing Contracts: Why Loss Framing Increases Effort (with Richard R. W. Brooks and Stephan Tontrup), 168 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 62-82 (2012).

    Sherod Thaxton. Leveraging Death, 103 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 475 (2013).

    Adam Winkler. Fatal in Theory and Strict in Fact: An Empirical Analysis of Strict Scrutiny in the Federal Courts, 59 Vanderbilt Law Review 793-871 (2006).

    Stephen C. Yeazell. Getting What We Asked For, Getting What We Paid For, and Not Liking What We Got: The Vanishing Civil Trial, 1 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 943-971 (2004).

    Jonathan Zasloff. Tiebout & Tax Revolts: Did Serrano Really Cause Proposition 13? (with Kirk J. Stark), 50 UCLA Law Review 801-58 (2003).

    Noah Zatz. Revisiting the Class Parity Analysis of Welfare Work Requirements, 83 Social Service Review 213 (2009).

    Eric M. Zolt. Inequality and Taxation: Evidence From the Americas on How Inequality May Influence Tax Institutions (with Kenneth L. Sokoloff), 59 Tax Law Review 167-241 (2006).

News
See All
Aug 14, 2020

Eugene Volokh Cited in Los Angeles Times on Kamala Harris’ Birthright Citizenship

Read More
Aug 13, 2020

Variety Reports on Ken Ziffren’s Interview with CAA’s Bryan Lourd at 44th Annual UCLA Entertainment Symposium

Read More